SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenttion efforts were completed. All sites where institutional controls were established are tracked using ageographical information system that includes maps, site descriptions, and contaminant data for eachsite.Any entity performing work on FRA must obtain permission, in the form of an Excavation ClearanceRequest, from the Army prior to excavating. Permission to excavate is granted only after a review ofthe environmental conditions. If proposed excavations are in areas where controls have been established,permission to excavate may be denied. Otherwise, the entity performing the excavation will berequired to sample and remediate any contamination encountered during excavation.LeadLBP surveys (Hart Crowser 1997) and risk assessments were also conducted in representative familyhousing units at FRA. The results of the surveys indicated that lead hazards were present in most familyhousing units, the most common type being deteriorating LBP. Some of the surveyed units wereidentified with elevated lead levels in dust or exterior soils. Some testing has been conducted on otherbuildings outside of family housing. All buildings inspected have had lead-based paint on interior orexterior surfaces.AsbestosLimited asbestos surveys were conducted on family housing units on FRA (Hart Crowser 1997). Asbestos-containingmaterials, such as floor tile, linoleum, mastic (adhesive), wallboard, pipe insulation,pipefitting insulation, and tarpaper, were found in most family housing units surveyed. Most materialappeared to be in good condition, and any asbestos-containing material that was damaged was eitherabated or removed. Neighborhood revitalization programs have resulted in the removal of asbestosfrom many housing units. All asbestos materials that are removed are documented for disposal in asbestoscells at local landfills.With the exception of the housing units, few buildings on the posts have been surveyed for asbestos.USARAK has developed an Asbestos Management Plan in accordance with AR 200–1. This is designedto reduce exposure to occupants and workers on post and to ensure compliance with federallaws.Pesticides/HerbicidesUSARAK has implemented an Integrated Pest Management Plan for FRA. The goal of the plan is toprovide guidance to operate and maintain effective programs that ensure effective and environmentallysafe pest control. The function of the Integrated Pest Management Plan is to provide acceptablemanagement of pests.RadonRadon testing is common in many buildings throughout Alaska, including those on USARAK properties.All Army installations are required, under the Army Radon Reduction Program (AR 200–1), tomaintain and update records pertaining to radon assessments. A radon survey was conducted at FRAduring between 1989 and 1990. The survey indicated that many structures at FRA exceeded the4 pCi/L regulatory limit and required mitigation actions to reduce radon levels.Radon records for FRA were inadvertently destroyed, but radon monitoring and mitigation continuein an effort to replace documentation that was previously destroyed. Radon surveys are conducted forall newly constructed facilities.February 2008 3–120 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentHazardous WastesFRA is registered with the USEPA as a “Large Quantity Generator” of hazardous waste, per RCRA(42 U.S.C. 6901). Hazardous wastes at FRA are associated with equipment maintenance (e.g., vehicles,boats, and aircraft) and facilities operation. Hazardous materials include petroleum-contaminatedabsorbent pads, batteries, light ballasts, mercury-containing light bulbs, non-recyclable oils and fuels,compressed gas, non-recyclable hydraulic fluid, LBP, paint, paint thinners and solvents, photodevelopingchemicals, sandblast residue, solvents and degreasers, thermostats with mercury ampoules,and non-recyclable transmission fluid. The wastes are temporarily stored in drums at satelliteaccumulation points located around post. Satellite accumulation points are located where wastes aregenerated on a continual basis. Other locations or facilities that do not generate wastes are subject toon-call collection of hazardous wastes.Currently, Building 45–125 on FRA serves as the centralized hazardous waste collection site. Allhazardous wastes that are collected on post are brought to this facility to be processed for off-postdisposal. During 2001, FRA generated 4,959,080 pounds of hazardous waste. This amount was artificiallyhigh because of off-site disposal of PCB-contaminated soil. On average, hazardous waste generatedat FRA is less than 100,000 pounds per year.Biomedical WasteA small amount of biomedical or infectious waste would be generated and temporarily stored at themedical and dental facilities on FRA. The Army follows the AR-200–1 guidelines for the handing,use, and disposal of medical and dental supplies and wastes.3.2.8.2 Donnelly Training AreaBecause of the lack of a cantonment area, housing, and potential waste-generating facilities, DTAuses and generates fewer hazardous materials or wastes compared to FRA. The hazardous materialsand wastes on training lands at DTA include ammunition, live-fire, unexploded ordnance, and leadcontamination on small arms ranges. In addition, the maintenance facilities at Beales, Bolio Lake, andTexas Range have storage tanks for the POLs used at distributed at these facilities. Pesticides andherbicides have been used around the maintenance facilities and on the small arm ranges.DTA contains both high hazard and dedicated impact areas. Impact areas are posted with warningsigns indicating the potential risks of unexploded ordnance on the impact area. Warning signs havebeen posted on all probable approaches to restricted areas on DTA.3.2.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES3.2.9.1 Fort RichardsonVegetation Community DescriptionsAn ecological survey of FRA conducted by Jorgensen et al. (2002) indicates that the 61,972-acre postis covered by forest (55.3 percent), scrublands (23.7 percent), barren lands (5.5 percent), human disturbedlands (13.1 percent), bog and wetland (1.6 percent), meadow (0.7 percent), and water(0.5 percent).Forests in the FRA area closely resemble the boreal forest of interior Alaska, but some tree speciestypically found in the coastal spruce/hemlock forest also occur. The distribution of forest types atFRA is heavily influenced by elevation, which ranges from sea level to more than 5,000 feet in lessFebruary 2008 3–121 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenttion efforts were completed. All sites where institutional controls were established are tracked <strong>us</strong>ing ageographical information system that includes maps, site descriptions, and contaminant data for eachsite.Any entity performing work on FRA m<strong>us</strong>t obtain permission, in the form of an Excavation ClearanceRequest, from the Army prior to excavating. Permission to excavate is granted only after a review ofthe environmental conditions. If proposed excavations are in areas where controls have been established,permission to excavate may be denied. Otherwise, the entity performing the excavation will berequired to sample and remediate any contamination encountered during excavation.LeadLBP surveys (Hart Crowser 1997) and risk assessments were also conducted in representative familyho<strong>us</strong>ing units at FRA. The results of the surveys indicated that lead hazards were present in most familyho<strong>us</strong>ing units, the most common type being deteriorating LBP. Some of the surveyed units wereidentified with elevated lead levels in d<strong>us</strong>t or exterior soils. Some testing has been conducted on otherbuildings outside of family ho<strong>us</strong>ing. All buildings inspected have had lead-based paint on interior orexterior surfaces.AsbestosLimited asbestos surveys were conducted on family ho<strong>us</strong>ing units on FRA (Hart Crowser 1997). Asbestos-containingmaterials, such as floor tile, linoleum, mastic (adhesive), wallboard, pipe insulation,pipefitting insulation, and tarpaper, were found in most family ho<strong>us</strong>ing units surveyed. Most materialappeared to be in good condition, and any asbestos-containing material that was damaged was eitherabated or removed. Neighborhood revitalization programs have resulted in the removal of asbestosfrom many ho<strong>us</strong>ing units. All asbestos materials that are removed are documented for disposal in asbestoscells at local landfills.With the exception of the ho<strong>us</strong>ing units, few buildings on the posts have been surveyed for asbestos.USARAK has developed an Asbestos Management Plan in accordance with AR 200–1. This is designedto reduce exposure to occupants and workers on post and to ensure compliance with federallaws.Pesticides/HerbicidesUSARAK has implemented an Integrated Pest Management Plan for FRA. The goal of the plan is toprovide guidance to operate and maintain effective programs that ensure effective and environmentallysafe pest control. The function of the Integrated Pest Management Plan is to provide acceptablemanagement of pests.RadonRadon testing is common in many buildings throughout Alaska, including those on USARAK properties.All Army installations are required, under the Army Radon Reduction Program (AR 200–1), tomaintain and update records pertaining to radon assessments. A radon survey was conducted at FRAduring between 1989 and 1990. The survey indicated that many structures at FRA exceeded the4 pCi/L regulatory limit and required mitigation actions to reduce radon levels.Radon records for FRA were inadvertently destroyed, but radon monitoring and mitigation continuein an effort to replace documentation that was previo<strong>us</strong>ly destroyed. Radon surveys are conducted forall newly constructed facilities.February 2008 3–120 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!