SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us
Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenttion efforts were completed. All sites where institutional controls were established are tracked using ageographical information system that includes maps, site descriptions, and contaminant data for eachsite.Any entity performing work on FRA must obtain permission, in the form of an Excavation ClearanceRequest, from the Army prior to excavating. Permission to excavate is granted only after a review ofthe environmental conditions. If proposed excavations are in areas where controls have been established,permission to excavate may be denied. Otherwise, the entity performing the excavation will berequired to sample and remediate any contamination encountered during excavation.LeadLBP surveys (Hart Crowser 1997) and risk assessments were also conducted in representative familyhousing units at FRA. The results of the surveys indicated that lead hazards were present in most familyhousing units, the most common type being deteriorating LBP. Some of the surveyed units wereidentified with elevated lead levels in dust or exterior soils. Some testing has been conducted on otherbuildings outside of family housing. All buildings inspected have had lead-based paint on interior orexterior surfaces.AsbestosLimited asbestos surveys were conducted on family housing units on FRA (Hart Crowser 1997). Asbestos-containingmaterials, such as floor tile, linoleum, mastic (adhesive), wallboard, pipe insulation,pipefitting insulation, and tarpaper, were found in most family housing units surveyed. Most materialappeared to be in good condition, and any asbestos-containing material that was damaged was eitherabated or removed. Neighborhood revitalization programs have resulted in the removal of asbestosfrom many housing units. All asbestos materials that are removed are documented for disposal in asbestoscells at local landfills.With the exception of the housing units, few buildings on the posts have been surveyed for asbestos.USARAK has developed an Asbestos Management Plan in accordance with AR 200–1. This is designedto reduce exposure to occupants and workers on post and to ensure compliance with federallaws.Pesticides/HerbicidesUSARAK has implemented an Integrated Pest Management Plan for FRA. The goal of the plan is toprovide guidance to operate and maintain effective programs that ensure effective and environmentallysafe pest control. The function of the Integrated Pest Management Plan is to provide acceptablemanagement of pests.RadonRadon testing is common in many buildings throughout Alaska, including those on USARAK properties.All Army installations are required, under the Army Radon Reduction Program (AR 200–1), tomaintain and update records pertaining to radon assessments. A radon survey was conducted at FRAduring between 1989 and 1990. The survey indicated that many structures at FRA exceeded the4 pCi/L regulatory limit and required mitigation actions to reduce radon levels.Radon records for FRA were inadvertently destroyed, but radon monitoring and mitigation continuein an effort to replace documentation that was previously destroyed. Radon surveys are conducted forall newly constructed facilities.February 2008 3–120 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentHazardous WastesFRA is registered with the USEPA as a “Large Quantity Generator” of hazardous waste, per RCRA(42 U.S.C. 6901). Hazardous wastes at FRA are associated with equipment maintenance (e.g., vehicles,boats, and aircraft) and facilities operation. Hazardous materials include petroleum-contaminatedabsorbent pads, batteries, light ballasts, mercury-containing light bulbs, non-recyclable oils and fuels,compressed gas, non-recyclable hydraulic fluid, LBP, paint, paint thinners and solvents, photodevelopingchemicals, sandblast residue, solvents and degreasers, thermostats with mercury ampoules,and non-recyclable transmission fluid. The wastes are temporarily stored in drums at satelliteaccumulation points located around post. Satellite accumulation points are located where wastes aregenerated on a continual basis. Other locations or facilities that do not generate wastes are subject toon-call collection of hazardous wastes.Currently, Building 45–125 on FRA serves as the centralized hazardous waste collection site. Allhazardous wastes that are collected on post are brought to this facility to be processed for off-postdisposal. During 2001, FRA generated 4,959,080 pounds of hazardous waste. This amount was artificiallyhigh because of off-site disposal of PCB-contaminated soil. On average, hazardous waste generatedat FRA is less than 100,000 pounds per year.Biomedical WasteA small amount of biomedical or infectious waste would be generated and temporarily stored at themedical and dental facilities on FRA. The Army follows the AR-200–1 guidelines for the handing,use, and disposal of medical and dental supplies and wastes.3.2.8.2 Donnelly Training AreaBecause of the lack of a cantonment area, housing, and potential waste-generating facilities, DTAuses and generates fewer hazardous materials or wastes compared to FRA. The hazardous materialsand wastes on training lands at DTA include ammunition, live-fire, unexploded ordnance, and leadcontamination on small arms ranges. In addition, the maintenance facilities at Beales, Bolio Lake, andTexas Range have storage tanks for the POLs used at distributed at these facilities. Pesticides andherbicides have been used around the maintenance facilities and on the small arm ranges.DTA contains both high hazard and dedicated impact areas. Impact areas are posted with warningsigns indicating the potential risks of unexploded ordnance on the impact area. Warning signs havebeen posted on all probable approaches to restricted areas on DTA.3.2.9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES3.2.9.1 Fort RichardsonVegetation Community DescriptionsAn ecological survey of FRA conducted by Jorgensen et al. (2002) indicates that the 61,972-acre postis covered by forest (55.3 percent), scrublands (23.7 percent), barren lands (5.5 percent), human disturbedlands (13.1 percent), bog and wetland (1.6 percent), meadow (0.7 percent), and water(0.5 percent).Forests in the FRA area closely resemble the boreal forest of interior Alaska, but some tree speciestypically found in the coastal spruce/hemlock forest also occur. The distribution of forest types atFRA is heavily influenced by elevation, which ranges from sea level to more than 5,000 feet in lessFebruary 2008 3–121 2/25th SBCT Final EIS
- Page 179 and 180: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentc
- Page 181 and 182: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environments
- Page 183 and 184: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentB
- Page 185 and 186: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentR
- Page 187 and 188: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentF
- Page 189 and 190: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment
- Page 191 and 192: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentA
- Page 193 and 194: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentt
- Page 195 and 196: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
- Page 197 and 198: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentn
- Page 199: Rajeev GandhiComputerRS-CIT Feb-13
- Page 202 and 203: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentK
- Page 204 and 205: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 206 and 207: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentG
- Page 208 and 209: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmento
- Page 210 and 211: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
- Page 212 and 213: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentG
- Page 214 and 215: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 216 and 217: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentf
- Page 218 and 219: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmento
- Page 220 and 221: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentP
- Page 222 and 223: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentP
- Page 224 and 225: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenti
- Page 226 and 227: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentH
- Page 228 and 229: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentH
- Page 232 and 233: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentt
- Page 234 and 235: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentg
- Page 236 and 237: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentA
- Page 238 and 239: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentN
- Page 240 and 241: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenta
- Page 242 and 243: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentw
- Page 244 and 245: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentP
- Page 246 and 247: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentU
- Page 248 and 249: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 250 and 251: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment
- Page 252 and 253: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentn
- Page 254 and 255: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentf
- Page 256 and 257: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentG
- Page 258 and 259: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 260 and 261: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentp
- Page 262 and 263: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 264 and 265: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentH
- Page 266 and 267: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environment3
- Page 268 and 269: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentv
- Page 270 and 271: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentT
- Page 272 and 273: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentb
- Page 274 and 275: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmentb
- Page 276 and 277: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentH
- Page 278 and 279: Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected EnvironmentP
Chapter 3 ⎯ Affected Environmenttion efforts were completed. All sites where institutional controls were established are tracked <strong>us</strong>ing ageographical information system that includes maps, site descriptions, and contaminant data for eachsite.Any entity performing work on FRA m<strong>us</strong>t obtain permission, in the form of an Excavation ClearanceRequest, from the Army prior to excavating. Permission to excavate is granted only after a review ofthe environmental conditions. If proposed excavations are in areas where controls have been established,permission to excavate may be denied. Otherwise, the entity performing the excavation will berequired to sample and remediate any contamination encountered during excavation.LeadLBP surveys (Hart Crowser 1997) and risk assessments were also conducted in representative familyho<strong>us</strong>ing units at FRA. The results of the surveys indicated that lead hazards were present in most familyho<strong>us</strong>ing units, the most common type being deteriorating LBP. Some of the surveyed units wereidentified with elevated lead levels in d<strong>us</strong>t or exterior soils. Some testing has been conducted on otherbuildings outside of family ho<strong>us</strong>ing. All buildings inspected have had lead-based paint on interior orexterior surfaces.AsbestosLimited asbestos surveys were conducted on family ho<strong>us</strong>ing units on FRA (Hart Crowser 1997). Asbestos-containingmaterials, such as floor tile, linoleum, mastic (adhesive), wallboard, pipe insulation,pipefitting insulation, and tarpaper, were found in most family ho<strong>us</strong>ing units surveyed. Most materialappeared to be in good condition, and any asbestos-containing material that was damaged was eitherabated or removed. Neighborhood revitalization programs have resulted in the removal of asbestosfrom many ho<strong>us</strong>ing units. All asbestos materials that are removed are documented for disposal in asbestoscells at local landfills.With the exception of the ho<strong>us</strong>ing units, few buildings on the posts have been surveyed for asbestos.USARAK has developed an Asbestos Management Plan in accordance with AR 200–1. This is designedto reduce exposure to occupants and workers on post and to ensure compliance with federallaws.Pesticides/HerbicidesUSARAK has implemented an Integrated Pest Management Plan for FRA. The goal of the plan is toprovide guidance to operate and maintain effective programs that ensure effective and environmentallysafe pest control. The function of the Integrated Pest Management Plan is to provide acceptablemanagement of pests.RadonRadon testing is common in many buildings throughout Alaska, including those on USARAK properties.All Army installations are required, under the Army Radon Reduction Program (AR 200–1), tomaintain and update records pertaining to radon assessments. A radon survey was conducted at FRAduring between 1989 and 1990. The survey indicated that many structures at FRA exceeded the4 pCi/L regulatory limit and required mitigation actions to reduce radon levels.Radon records for FRA were inadvertently destroyed, but radon monitoring and mitigation continuein an effort to replace documentation that was previo<strong>us</strong>ly destroyed. Radon surveys are conducted forall newly constructed facilities.February 2008 3–120 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>