SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us SBCT Final EIS - Govsupport.us

govsupport.us
from govsupport.us More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Executive SummaryAs discussed, these areas of need are all explicitly or implicitly addressed throughout the guiding nationalsecurity and defense policy documents and are non-discretionary elements of Army decision making forthe permanent stationing of the 2/25 th SBCT.Purpose of the Proposed ActionThe purpose of the Proposed Action is to station the 2/25 th SBCT permanently at an installation that isable to meet the SBCT’s training, Soldier and Family quality of life, and operational and strategic deploymentrequirements. The installation must be capable of providing adequate training ranges for maneuverand live-fire training, and the installation must be able to provide the support infrastructure necessaryto provide a sound quality of life for Soldiers and their Families and support garrison-based SBCToperations. In addition, the stationing action must provide for the National Security requirements outlinedin the NSS, NDS, and QDR and provide the necessary strategic response capabilities to satisfy nationalsecurity requirements and obligations.Scope of AnalysisThis EIS has been developed in accordance with NEPA and the regulations issued by the Council on EnvironmentalQuality (CEQ), and Army implementing regulations. This EIS is also designed to address thedeficiencies in the 2004 FEIS identified by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The purposeof the EIS is to inform Army decision makers and the public of the likely environmental consequences ofthe Proposed Action and reasonable alternatives to meet the purpose and need for permanently stationingthe 2/25 th SBCT. This EIS will assist Army decision makers in more fully understanding the environmentalissues and social concerns connected with the stationing action. There is sufficient informationregarding the existing condition and impacts to environmental resources for all reasonable stationing alternativesconsidered in this EIS. This information allowed the Army to take a fair, objective, and comparativehard look at the environmental effects of the Proposed Action and all reasonable alternatives.It should be noted that a full and detailed EIS has been carried out in its entirety to analyze the environmentalimpacts to Hawaii at a project-specific level of detail. Design and construction of 2/25 th SBCTfacility projects are underway or even completed in some cases to the extent permitted by the U.S. DistrictCourt. The purpose of this EIS is to present a comparative analysis of the Proposed Action and alternatives.It therefore includes only the level of detail necessary to perform that analysis and to inform thedecision maker of the environmental trade-offs among alternatives. This approach permits the decisionmaker to take a “hard look” at environmental impacts among alternatives prior to making a final decisionselecting a home-stationing site for the 2/25 th .If Army decision makers choose a site other than Hawaii for the permanent home stationing of the 2/25 thSBCT, additional site-specific NEPA analysis will be prepared for those additional construction projectsneeded to support the SBCT. If an Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) moves to Hawaii under thisaction and additional facilities are required in Hawaii, additional NEPA documentation may be required.If the Army decides to keep the SBCT in Hawaii, no additional NEPA documentation is anticipated becausethe 2004 Transformation FEIS and this EIS provide sufficient analysis.This EIS supplements the 2004 FEIS, and that FEIS is incorporated by reference. This EIS updates the2004 FEIS by adding new information about the affected environment. It also includes new informationabout impacts. The Proposed Action has also changed to some degree because the standard design for theSBCT has been modified. This results in relatively minor changes to equipment, number of Soldiers, andmunitions usage. For that reason, there is considerable updated analysis in this EIS. The special focus ofthis EIS is to examine the impacts of Stryker-specific projects because it is these projects that would notFebruary 2008 xiv 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Executive Summarybe carried forward if somewhere other than Hawaii were selected at the permanent home station of the2/25 th SBCT.This EIS does not analyze the use of Makua Military Reservation (MMR). The SBCT can be stationedand fully trained without the use of MMR. Thus, use of MMR is not required to implement the ProposedAction. If MMR were available, Soldiers of the SBCT might use it for some purposes. The use of MMRfor resumption of military live-fire exercises is being analyzed in a separate EIS. The level of use ofMMR for live-fire exercises will be determined with preparation, signature, and release of a separateROD. If the ROD permits use of MMR for live-fire exercises, the unit stationed at USAG-HI under theProposed Action and alternatives to it could use MMR for live-fire training exercises at a unit level andtype considered in the MMR EIS and permitted by the ROD.Decisions to be MadeThe Army Deputy Chief of Staff, in concert with other Army decision makers will review the analysesand conclusions drawn in this EIS and decide on the permanent home station of the 2/25 th SBCT. The decisionwill be based on the results of this EIS and on consideration of all relevant factors including mission,cost, technical factors, and environmental considerations. This EIS identifies and presents the fullrange of reasonable alternatives capable of meeting the purpose and need for permanently homestationingand training of the 2/25 th SBCT. Decisions regarding transformation, BRAC 2005, nationalsecurity strategy, and other decisions made in the NSS, NDS, and QDR are not revisited in this document.Public InvolvementThe public’s participation is essential to a successful NEPA analysis. The CEQ and Army NEPA regulationsprovide several opportunities for the public to participate. These include issuing in the Federal Registera Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS 1 , a public scoping process, a 45-day public review periodfor the DEIS, and publication of the FEIS, accompanied by a 30-day mandatory waiting period before afinal decision is made and a ROD is issued.Following publication of the NOI, public notices were published in the major newspapers on the Islandsof Hawaii and Oahu announcing the times and locations of five public scoping meetings to solicit inputand to obtain comments on the scope of the EIS. Public notices were also published in Colorado, Alaska,Washington, and Kentucky announcing the times and locations of nine public scoping meetings in thesefour states. The 45-day scoping period began on January 4, 2007 and ended on February 20, 2007. Fourteenscoping meetings were held between January 29 and February 16, 2007. For residents and groups inHawaii, public scoping meetings were held in Waianae, Honolulu, Haleiwa, Waikoloa, and Hilo. Forresidents and groups in Colorado, public meetings were held in Colorado Springs, Trinidad, and La Junta.For residents and groups in Alaska, public meetings were held in Anchorage and Delta Junction. For residentsand groups in Kentucky, public meetings were held in Shepherdsville and Radcliff. Finally, forresidents and groups in Washington, public meetings were held in Lakewood and Yakima. A total of 284people signed in at the 14 meetings.At the public scoping meetings, 69 individuals and persons representing organizations provided oralcomments via court reporters and video camera for the Army’s consideration. The Army also receivedwritten comments from 199 individuals and organizations in the form of e-mails, facsimiles, individualletters, and form letters. The Army compiled a scoping report, identifying and assessing the issues1 The Notice of Intent for this EIS was published in the Federal Register, January 4, 2007 (76 FR 9717).February 2008 xv 2/25th SBCT Final EIS

Executive Summarybe carried forward if somewhere other than Hawaii were selected at the permanent home station of the2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>.This <strong>EIS</strong> does not analyze the <strong>us</strong>e of Makua Military Reservation (MMR). The <strong>SBCT</strong> can be stationedand fully trained without the <strong>us</strong>e of MMR. Th<strong>us</strong>, <strong>us</strong>e of MMR is not required to implement the ProposedAction. If MMR were available, Soldiers of the <strong>SBCT</strong> might <strong>us</strong>e it for some purposes. The <strong>us</strong>e of MMRfor resumption of military live-fire exercises is being analyzed in a separate <strong>EIS</strong>. The level of <strong>us</strong>e ofMMR for live-fire exercises will be determined with preparation, signature, and release of a separateROD. If the ROD permits <strong>us</strong>e of MMR for live-fire exercises, the unit stationed at USAG-HI under theProposed Action and alternatives to it could <strong>us</strong>e MMR for live-fire training exercises at a unit level andtype considered in the MMR <strong>EIS</strong> and permitted by the ROD.Decisions to be MadeThe Army Deputy Chief of Staff, in concert with other Army decision makers will review the analysesand concl<strong>us</strong>ions drawn in this <strong>EIS</strong> and decide on the permanent home station of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>. The decisionwill be based on the results of this <strong>EIS</strong> and on consideration of all relevant factors including mission,cost, technical factors, and environmental considerations. This <strong>EIS</strong> identifies and presents the fullrange of reasonable alternatives capable of meeting the purpose and need for permanently homestationingand training of the 2/25 th <strong>SBCT</strong>. Decisions regarding transformation, BRAC 2005, nationalsecurity strategy, and other decisions made in the NSS, NDS, and QDR are not revisited in this document.Public InvolvementThe public’s participation is essential to a successful NEPA analysis. The CEQ and Army NEPA regulationsprovide several opportunities for the public to participate. These include issuing in the Federal Registera Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an <strong>EIS</strong> 1 , a public scoping process, a 45-day public review periodfor the D<strong>EIS</strong>, and publication of the F<strong>EIS</strong>, accompanied by a 30-day mandatory waiting period before afinal decision is made and a ROD is issued.Following publication of the NOI, public notices were published in the major newspapers on the Islandsof Hawaii and Oahu announcing the times and locations of five public scoping meetings to solicit inputand to obtain comments on the scope of the <strong>EIS</strong>. Public notices were also published in Colorado, Alaska,Washington, and Kentucky announcing the times and locations of nine public scoping meetings in thesefour states. The 45-day scoping period began on January 4, 2007 and ended on February 20, 2007. Fourteenscoping meetings were held between January 29 and February 16, 2007. For residents and groups inHawaii, public scoping meetings were held in Waianae, Honolulu, Haleiwa, Waikoloa, and Hilo. Forresidents and groups in Colorado, public meetings were held in Colorado Springs, Trinidad, and La Junta.For residents and groups in Alaska, public meetings were held in Anchorage and Delta Junction. For residentsand groups in Kentucky, public meetings were held in Shepherdsville and Radcliff. <strong>Final</strong>ly, forresidents and groups in Washington, public meetings were held in Lakewood and Yakima. A total of 284people signed in at the 14 meetings.At the public scoping meetings, 69 individuals and persons representing organizations provided oralcomments via court reporters and video camera for the Army’s consideration. The Army also receivedwritten comments from 199 individuals and organizations in the form of e-mails, facsimiles, individualletters, and form letters. The Army compiled a scoping report, identifying and assessing the issues1 The Notice of Intent for this <strong>EIS</strong> was published in the Federal Register, January 4, 2007 (76 FR 9717).February 2008 xv 2/25th <strong>SBCT</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>EIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!