Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
40 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO EB.4 (Sa) - ENMale olfactory dimorphism in a population of mexican orchid beesCarolin Pfeiffer, Thomas EltzInstitut für Neurobiologie, AG Sinnesökologie, Universität DüsseldorfMale orchid bees collect volatiles from flowers, decaying wood and other natural sources and storethem as species-specific perfumes in leg pockets. This perfume is later exposed during courtshipdisplay and probably serves as a mate recognition cue. In Yucatan, Mexico, there exist two malemorphs of E. viridissima which differ not only in the number of mandibular teeth (2 or 3) but also inthe composition of collected perfumes. Leg pockets of 3-toothed males contain quantities of a conspicuousbenzenoid (HNDB, 4 isomers), which is completely absent from 2-toothed males. We hypothesizedthat this results from (a) morph-specific differences in antennal sensitivity to HNDB and(b) corresponding differences in attraction to the currently unknown HNDB source. Both parts ofthe hypothesis were supported: (a) 3-toothed males exhibited substantially larger antennal responsesto HNDB in electroantennogram (EAG and GC-EAD) tests, while showing identical responses toall other tested compounds. (b) Synthetic HNDB attracted exclusively 3-toothed males during fieldbioassay. These results support the idea that differences in the olfactory periphery may initiate speciationin orchid bees, in which both male trait (accumulated perfume) and female preference (forthe perfume) may be jointly altered by an olfactory mutation.O EB.5 (Sa) - ENSkin feeding caecilian amphibians: rule or exception?Alexander Kupfer 1 , Marta Maria Antoniazzi 2 , Carlos Jared 2 , Mark Wilkinson 31Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena; 2 Laboratório de Biologia Celular, Instituto Butantan, Sao Paulo, Brasil;3Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London, UKMaternal dermatophagy (aka skin feeding) is an extraordinary form of parental investment that wasrecently discovered in an African caecilian amphibian (Nature 440: 926-929). Here we report thisunusual form of parental care, involving co-evolved specialisations of both maternal skin and offspringdentition in a second, distantly related Neotropical species, Siphonops annulatus. In additionto skin feeding, young were observed to imbibe liquid exuded from the maternal cloaca. The multiplepresence of skin feeding in various caecilian species provides evidence of homology and hasconsequences for understanding the evolution of viviparity in amphibians. We hypothesise that (1)maternal dermatophagy is widespread among oviparous direct developing caecilians, and (2) that viviparouscaecilians which feed of on the hypertrophied maternal oviduct evolved from skin-feedingancestors. The diversity of parental care strategies makes the limbless tropical caecilian amphibiansan excellent model group to study life history evolution.
Evolutionary Biology Symposium 41O EB.6 (Sa) - ENCommon origin and common environment effects on offspring performance in thecoal tit Periparus ater: a balanced cross-foster experimentTim Schmoll 1 , Wolfgang Winkel 2 , Thomas Lubjuhn 11Institut für Evolutionsbiologie & Ökologie, Universität Bonn; 2 Institut für Vogelforschung “VogelwarteHelgoland”Phenotypic variation between individuals within natural populations is a ubiquitous phenomenon.In many contexts it is important to assess how much phenotypic variation may be due to genotypicvariation, especially to additive genetic variation determining trait heritability. Examples include thepotential for evolutionary response to environmental change or the magnitude of genetic benefitsthat may be accomplished by mate choice. But estimating additive genetic variances in the fieldis not always straightforward, for example when offspring of high-quality parents are brought upin high-quality microhabitats and thus the resemblance due to additive genetic effects will be confoundeddue to genotype-environment correlations and non-genetic parental effects. Here we analysephenotypic variation of offspring traits in a population of the coal tit Periparus ater, a sociallymonogamous, territorial passerine bird with biparental care. Traits investigated include body sizeand fledgling body condition as well as local recruitment, a major predictor of lifetime reproductivesuccess in passerine birds. Applying mixed effects models we first address natural variation betweenbroods in these traits and then use a balanced cross-foster design to experimentally separate effectsof a common origin (i.e. genetic effects as well as maternal effects) from effects of a common offspringrearing environment.O EB.7 (Sa) - ENLife-history evolution in a changing worldThomas S. Hoffmeister 1 , Louise E.M. Vet 2 , Patrick Coquillard 3 , Eric Wajnberg 31Populationsökologie, Universität Bremen; 2 Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Heteren, NL;3I.N.R.A. Sophia Antipolis, FranceGlobal environmental changes include the fragmentation of habitats as well as their stability withinand across seasons. For instance, imagine a large continuous environment with more or less constantresource availability contrasted with habitat islands in which, due to seasonal fluctuations, resourcesmight be present at one time and absent at other times. The latter allows animals to forage locally inone generation but forces them to disperse to other such habitat islands in other generations. In such asituation, many insects that forage for oviposition resources like butterflies searching for host plantsand parasitoid wasps hunting for host insects face the dilemma that they need to trade-off fecundityagainst the lifetime they can invest into foraging for oviposition sites. Using evolutionary algorithmswe analysed optimal trade-offs for insects facing different environments, and the optimal plasticity– the capability of adjusting the fecundity-survival trade-off within a lifetime – when such plasticityis costly. Additionally, we explored the effect of competition on these life-history strategies.
- Page 6 and 7: General Lectures
- Page 8 and 9: General LecturesG SE.2 (Mo) - DENac
- Page 10 and 11: Plenary Lectures
- Page 12 and 13: Plenary Lecturesduring insect evolu
- Page 14 and 15: 10 Plenary Lectures
- Page 16 and 17: 12 Key Lectures of the Symposia
- Page 18 and 19: 14 Key Lectures of the SymposiaS DB
- Page 20 and 21: 16 Key Lectures of the Symposialarg
- Page 22 and 23: 18 Key Lectures of the Symposiaphor
- Page 24 and 25: 20 Key Lectures of the Symposiature
- Page 26 and 27: 22 Behavioral Biology Symposium
- Page 28 and 29: 24 Behavioral Biology SymposiumO BB
- Page 30 and 31: 26 Behavioral Biology SymposiumO BB
- Page 32 and 33: 28 Behavioral Biology SymposiumO BB
- Page 34 and 35: 30 Developmental Biology Symposium
- Page 36 and 37: 32 Developmental Biology SymposiumO
- Page 38 and 39: 34 Developmental Biology SymposiumO
- Page 40 and 41: 36 Developmental Biology Symposium
- Page 42 and 43: 38 Evolutionary Biology Symposium
- Page 46 and 47: 42 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO
- Page 48 and 49: 44 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO
- Page 50 and 51: 46 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO
- Page 52 and 53: 48 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO
- Page 54 and 55: 50 Evolutionary Biology SymposiumO
- Page 56 and 57: 52 Ecology Symposium
- Page 58 and 59: 54 Ecology SymposiumO EC.3 (Sa) - E
- Page 60 and 61: 56 Ecology SymposiumO EC.7 (Sa) - E
- Page 62 and 63: 58 Ecology SymposiumO EC.11 (Sa) -
- Page 64 and 65: 60 Ecology SymposiumO EC.15 (Mo) -
- Page 66 and 67: 62 Ecology Symposium
- Page 68 and 69: 64 Morphology Symposium
- Page 70 and 71: 66 Morphology SymposiumO MO.3 (Su)
- Page 72 and 73: 68 Morphology SymposiumO MO.7 (Mo)
- Page 74 and 75: 70 Morphology SymposiumO MO.11 (Mo)
- Page 76 and 77: 72 Morphology SymposiumO MO.15 (Mo)
- Page 78 and 79: 74 Neurobiology Symposium
- Page 80 and 81: 76 Neurobiology SymposiumO NB.3 (Su
- Page 83 and 84: Physiology Symposium 79Physiology S
- Page 85 and 86: Physiology Symposium 81O PH.1 (Sa)
- Page 87 and 88: Physiology Symposium 83O PH.5 (Sa)
- Page 89 and 90: Physiology Symposium 85O PH.9 (Sa)
- Page 91 and 92: Physiology Symposium 87especially c
- Page 93: Physiology Symposium 89O PH.17 (Mo)
Evolutionary Biology Symposium 41O EB.6 (Sa) - ENCommon origin and common environment effects on offspring performance in thecoal tit Periparus ater: a balanced cross-foster experimentTim Schmoll 1 , Wolfgang Winkel 2 , Thomas Lubjuhn 11Institut für Evolutionsbiologie & Ökologie, Universität Bonn; 2 Institut für Vogelforschung “VogelwarteHelgoland”Phenotypic variation between individuals within natural populations is a ubiquitous phenomenon.In many contexts it is important to assess how much phenotypic variation may be due to genotypicvariation, especially to additive genetic variation determining trait heritability. Examples include thepotential for evolutionary response to environmental change or the magnitude of genetic benefitsthat may be accomplished by mate choice. But estimating additive genetic variances in the fieldis not always straightforward, for example when offspring of high-quality parents are brought upin high-quality microhabitats and thus the resemblance due to additive genetic effects will be confoundeddue to genotype-environment correlations and non-genetic parental effects. Here we analysephenotypic variation of offspring traits in a population of the coal tit Periparus ater, a sociallymonogamous, territorial passerine bird with biparental care. Traits investigated include body sizeand fledgling body condition as well as local recruitment, a major predictor of lifetime reproductivesuccess in passerine birds. Applying mixed effects models we first address natural variation betweenbroods in these traits and then use a balanced cross-foster design to experimentally separate effectsof a common origin (i.e. genetic effects as well as maternal effects) from effects of a common offspringrearing environment.O EB.7 (Sa) - ENLife-history evolution in a changing worldThomas S. Hoffmeister 1 , Louise E.M. Vet 2 , Patrick Coquillard 3 , Eric Wajnberg 31Populationsökologie, Universität Bremen; 2 Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Heteren, NL;3I.N.R.A. Sophia Antipolis, FranceGlobal environmental changes include the fragmentation of habitats as well as their stability withinand across seasons. For instance, imagine a large continuous environment with more or less constantresource availability contrasted with habitat islands in which, due to seasonal fluctuations, resourcesmight be present at one time and absent at other times. The latter allows animals to forage locally inone generation but forces them to disperse to other such habitat islands in other generations. In such asituation, many insects that forage for oviposition resources like butterflies searching for host plantsand parasitoid wasps hunting for host insects face the dilemma that they need to trade-off fecundityagainst the lifetime they can invest into foraging for oviposition sites. Using evolutionary algorithmswe analysed optimal trade-offs for insects facing different environments, and the optimal plasticity– the capability of adjusting the fecundity-survival trade-off within a lifetime – when such plasticityis costly. Additionally, we explored the effect of competition on these life-history strategies.