Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
212 Zoological Systematics PostersP ZS.15 - ENTowards a global assessment of taxonomic needs and capacities: What taxonomists dowe need where?Swen Renner, Christoph HäuserStaatliches Museum für Naturkunde, StuttgartThe Global Taxonomic Initiative (GTI) is a cross-cutting theme of the UN Convention on BiologicalDiversity (CBD), and has asked in 2002 for national, regional and global assessments of taxonomicneeds and capacities (UNEP/CBD/COP6/Decision VI/8). Whereas several national and regional assessmentsof taxonomic needs and capacities have already been compiled, a global assessment isstill pending. As an important contribution for a global assessment, information about the currentstate of knowledge of national biodiversity and available taxonomic capacities is being compiled.The German GTI National Focal Point contributes to the global assessment by analyzing numbersof existing vs. needed taxonomists, and by assessing the species numbers per taxonomic group andcountry. The preliminary results indicate, not surprisingly, that existing taxonomic knowledge andresources are distributed unequally among countries and taxonomic groups. Whereas numbers oftaxonomists and the relative states of knowledge about their countries’ biodiversity are positivelycorrelated, numbers of taxonomists negatively correlate with the known or estimated species richnessper country. Especially tropical regions of Africa need more taxonomic expertise, as well asmany parts of SE Asia. Moreover, the state of knowledge of certain “unpopular” and not especiallyprominent groups such as micro-organisms, algae, fungi, and several invertebrate groups is regionallyas well as globally poor.P ZS.16 - EN454 pyrosequencing: large-scale phylogenomic approach of the scorpion PandinusimperatorFalko Roeding 1 , Michael Kube 2 , Richard Reinhardt 2 , Thorsten Burmester 11University of Hamburg; 2 Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, BerlinThe utility of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) for phylogenetic analyses has been shown, but commonlyused capillary electrophoresis sequencing techniques limit the throughput. An alternative,recently developed low-cost technique of emulsion DNA amplification and parallel pyrosequencing,increases the amount of raw data considerably. We present the results of an EST sequencing projectincluding the phylogenetic position of the Common Emporer Scorpion (Scorpionidae), a speciesfor which virtually no sequence data is available so far. The project yields in 439.432 sequencesassembled into 6.486 contigs and 160.207 singletons. A large number of sequences with orthologsin model organisms (identified via an extended BLAST search) shows the efficiency of this newtechnique and its potential use for large-scale phylogentic analyses.
Zoological Systematics Posters 213P ZS.17 - ENNew SINEs for pinniped phylogenyChristiane Schröder 1 , Stefanie Hartmann 2 , Christoph Bleidorn 1 , Ralph Tiedemann 11Evolutionary Biology/Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 2Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of PotsdamWhile the monophyly of the pinnipeds and the differentiation between phocids and otariids is wellestablished, the placement of the walrus within the pinnipeds is continuously under debate. Amongthe discussed hypotheses, the walrusses have been considered to (1) represent the sister group to theotariids, (2) group within the family Otariidae, (3) constitute the sister group to the phocids, or (4)represent a taxon within the phocids. So far, sequence based phylogenies could not unambiguouslyresolve this issue. Short interspersed elements (SINEs) have been proposed as an essentially homoplasy-freephylogenetic character. Their subsequent use has been however limited due to the difficultyto establish SINE loci in non-model organisms. Making use of available genomic resources,we screened complete genomes of two carnivores (cat and dog) for SINE containing introns, usingbioinformatic methods. By PCR and sequencing, we assessed absence/presence of these SINEs ina representative carnivoran taxon set. We discuss implications of our new data for pinniped phylogeny.P ZS.18 - ENThe DNA Bank Network GermanyThomas Knebelsberger 1 , Birgit Gemeinholzer 2 , Gerhard Haszprunar 1 , Hans-Peter Klenk 3 , IsabellaStöger 1 , Johann-Wolfgang Wägele 41Zoologische Staatssammlung München; 2 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem; 3 Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig; 4Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, BonnThe German Science Foundation (DFG) supports a national DNA Bank Network (www.dnabanknetwork.org)as service facility for research in the life sciences. Four partner institutions with complementaryexpertise are included: the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology Munich (ZSM), theBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem (BGBM), the Forschungsmuseum AlexanderKoenig Bonn (ZFMK), and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures Braunschweig(DSMZ). The main focus of the network is to enhance taxonomic, systematic, genetic, andevolutionary studies by providing: (1) at-cost availability of DNA material to extend and complementprevious studies. (2) high quality (-80°C) long-term storage of DNA material to allow for theverification and addition of data. (3) full documentation of each sample. The deposition of DNAsamples at the DNA Banks of the four partner institutions is free of charge under the warranty of afull documentation of each sample. This includes the provenance of the original material, the placeof voucher deposit and DNA quality and extraction information. The donors of DNA samples areguaranteed free access to their samples and the possibility to block the release of the DNA to otherscientists for a limited period of time. Depositing DNA material should become common practicefor any scientist conducting biological research following the “Proposals for safeguarding goodscientific practice” by the DFG.
- Page 166 and 167: 162 Morphology PostersP MO.24 - ENT
- Page 168 and 169: 164 Morphology PostersP MO.28 - ENK
- Page 170 and 171: 166 Morphology Postershave, unlike
- Page 172 and 173: 168 Morphology Postersmosses etc).
- Page 174 and 175: 170 Neurobiology Posters
- Page 176 and 177: 172 Neurobiology PostersP NB.3 - EN
- Page 178 and 179: 174 Neurobiology PostersP NB.7 - EN
- Page 180 and 181: 176 Neurobiology Posterslation of i
- Page 182 and 183: 178 Neurobiology Posterslabelling a
- Page 184 and 185: 180 Neurobiology PostersP NB.20 - E
- Page 186 and 187: 182 Neurobiology PostersP NB.24 - E
- Page 188 and 189: 184 Neurobiology PostersP NB.28 - E
- Page 190 and 191: 186 Physiology Posters
- Page 192 and 193: 188 Physiology PostersP PH.3 - ENEx
- Page 194 and 195: 190 Physiology PostersP PH.7 - ENNe
- Page 196 and 197: 192 Physiology PostersP PH.12 - ENA
- Page 198 and 199: 194 Physiology PostersP PH.16 - ENA
- Page 200 and 201: 196 Physiology PostersP PH.20 - ENO
- Page 202 and 203: 198 Physiology PostersP PH.24 - ENN
- Page 204 and 205: 200 Physiology PostersP PH.28 - DEN
- Page 206 and 207: 202 Physiology PostersP PH.32 - ENT
- Page 208 and 209: 204 Zoological Systematics Posters
- Page 210 and 211: 206 Zoological Systematics PostersP
- Page 212 and 213: 208 Zoological Systematics PostersP
- Page 214 and 215: 210 Zoological Systematics PostersP
- Page 219 and 220: 215Index
- Page 221 and 222: Index 217Abdel-latief, Mohatmed....
- Page 223 and 224: Index 219Hagenbucher, Steffen......
- Page 225 and 226: Index 221Merkel, Katharina.........
- Page 227 and 228: Index 223Siebenaller, Ulrike.......
- Page 229 and 230: Geryonia proboscidalis (Forskål, 1
Zoological Systematics Posters 213P ZS.17 - ENNew SINEs for pinniped phylogenyChristiane Schröder 1 , Stefanie Hartmann 2 , Christoph Bleidorn 1 , Ralph Tiedemann 11Evolutionary Biology/Zoology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, 2Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of PotsdamWhile the monophyly of the pinnipeds and the differentiation between phocids and otariids is wellestablished, the placement of the walrus within the pinnipeds is continuously under debate. Amongthe discussed hypotheses, the walrusses have been considered to (1) represent the sister group to theotariids, (2) group within the family Otariidae, (3) constitute the sister group to the phocids, or (4)represent a taxon within the phocids. So far, sequence based phylogenies could not unambiguouslyresolve this issue. Short interspersed elements (SINEs) have been proposed as an essentially homoplasy-freephylogenetic character. Their subsequent use has been however limited due to the difficultyto establish SINE loci in non-model organisms. Making use of available genomic resources,we screened complete genomes of two carnivores (cat and dog) for SINE containing introns, usingbioinformatic methods. By PCR and sequencing, we assessed absence/presence of these SINEs ina representative carnivoran taxon set. We discuss implications of our new data for pinniped phylogeny.P ZS.18 - ENThe DNA Bank Network GermanyThomas Knebelsberger 1 , Birgit Gemeinholzer 2 , Gerhard Haszprunar 1 , Hans-Peter Klenk 3 , IsabellaStöger 1 , Johann-Wolfgang Wägele 41<strong>Zoologische</strong> Staatssammlung München; 2 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem; 3 <strong>Deutsche</strong> Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Braunschweig; 4<strong>Zoologische</strong>s Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, BonnThe German Science Foundation (DFG) supports a national DNA Bank Network (www.dnabanknetwork.org)as service facility for research in the life sciences. Four partner institutions with complementaryexpertise are included: the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology Munich (ZSM), theBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem (BGBM), the Forschungsmuseum AlexanderKoenig Bonn (ZFMK), and the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures Braunschweig(DSMZ). The main focus of the network is to enhance taxonomic, systematic, genetic, andevolutionary studies by providing: (1) at-cost availability of DNA material to extend and complementprevious studies. (2) high quality (-80°C) long-term storage of DNA material to allow for theverification and addition of data. (3) full documentation of each sample. The deposition of DNAsamples at the DNA Banks of the four partner institutions is free of charge under the warranty of afull documentation of each sample. This includes the provenance of the original material, the placeof voucher deposit and DNA quality and extraction information. The donors of DNA samples areguaranteed free access to their samples and the possibility to block the release of the DNA to otherscientists for a limited period of time. Depositing DNA material should become common practicefor any scientist conducting biological research following the “Proposals for safeguarding goodscientific practice” by the DFG.