Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
122 Developmental Biology PostersP DB.7 - ENSomite fate mapping using GFP-transgenic axolotlsNadine Piekarski, Lennart Olsson1Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaSingle somite fate has been studied extensively using quail-chick chimeras. We are interested in towhat degree somite fate is conserved despite the conspicuous differences in morphology seen amongvertebrates. Therefore, we have focused our study on a urodele amphibian, the Mexican axolotl, inwhich long-term fate mapping is technically feasible. Compared to birds the axolotl is morphologicallyvery different e.g. in many skeletal muscles and in skeletal elements of the occipital region,as well as in the shoulder girdle, all known to be somitic derivatives from quail-chick chimeras.Somites two to six were fate-mapped by transplantation of single somites from GFP-transgenicaxolotls. Transplanted fluorescent somites and their derivatives were tracked in vivo, and cryosectionswere made. Our data reveal a highly conserved pattern of somitic derivatives among the twospecies. The shoulder girdle in axolotls for example has a segmental (more than one somite) and acomposite (somites and lateral plate) origin exactly as in chicken. However, there are small differencesthat could be caused by the different position in which it is being formed in the two species.We also found differences in the specific formation of the hypobranchial chord that gives rise tohypobranchial muscles. Our results support a conserved pattern of somitic derivatives, however, thesmall differences observed could be the key to understand the developmental basis of evolutionarychange in this system.P DB.8 - ENThe Hydra-FGFR Kringelchen partially rescues the htl- but not the btl-mutantphentotype of Drosophila melanogasterAnja Rudolf, Christine Hübinger, Katrin Hüsken, Angelika Vogt, Christian Hasse, Susanne Önel,Renate Renkawitz-Pohl, Monika HasselFachbereich 17, Philipps-Universität MarburgFibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are important regulators during axis formation, cell migrationand branching morphogenesis in embryogenesis throughout the animal kingdom (1). FGFRare receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) and display a highly conserved structure: two juxtamembraneIg-like loops bind FGF ligands, the intracellular split tyrosine kinase domain is highly conservedand SH2 and SH3-domain consensus sequences couple signalling to either ras/MAPK, PI-PKC orPI-3 kinase signalling. The Hydra vulgaris FGFR homologue Kringelchen controls detachment ofvegetatively growing young polyps (2). It was the first ancient FGFR that had been characterizedand was present in cnidaria already about 650 mya – long before bilateral-symmetric animals hadsplit off. We have used Drosophila melanogaster to investigate if Kringelchen can act as a prototypeFGFR and functionally replace one or both of the Drosophila FGFR Breathless (Btl) or Heartless(Htl) (3,4). To this end we established Gal-4-UAS fly lines transgenic for the Kringelchen proteinand crossed to null mutants of either of the two Drosophila FGFR. We show that Kringelchen selectivelysubstitutes for Htl- but not for Btl-signalling, which indicates specific functional conservationof FGFR signalling.
Evolutionary Biology Posters 123Evolutionary Biology Posters
- Page 76 and 77: 72 Morphology SymposiumO MO.15 (Mo)
- Page 78 and 79: 74 Neurobiology Symposium
- Page 80 and 81: 76 Neurobiology SymposiumO NB.3 (Su
- Page 83 and 84: Physiology Symposium 79Physiology S
- Page 85 and 86: Physiology Symposium 81O PH.1 (Sa)
- Page 87 and 88: Physiology Symposium 83O PH.5 (Sa)
- Page 89 and 90: Physiology Symposium 85O PH.9 (Sa)
- Page 91 and 92: Physiology Symposium 87especially c
- Page 93: Physiology Symposium 89O PH.17 (Mo)
- Page 96 and 97: 92 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 98 and 99: 94 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 100 and 101: 96 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 102 and 103: 98 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 104 and 105: 100 Zoological Systematics Symposiu
- Page 106 and 107: 102 Zoological Systematics Symposiu
- Page 108 and 109: 104 Behavioral Biology Posters
- Page 110 and 111: 106 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 112 and 113: 108 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 114 and 115: 110 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 116 and 117: 112 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 118 and 119: 114 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 120 and 121: 116 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 122 and 123: 118 Developmental Biology Posters
- Page 124 and 125: 120 Developmental Biology PostersP
- Page 128 and 129: 124 Evolutionary Biology Posters
- Page 130 and 131: 126 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 132 and 133: 128 Evolutionary Biology Postersnum
- Page 134 and 135: 130 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 136 and 137: 132 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 138 and 139: 134 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 140 and 141: 136 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 142 and 143: 138 Ecology Posters
- Page 144 and 145: 140 Ecology PostersP EC.3 - ENLife
- Page 146 and 147: 142 Ecology PostersP EC.7 - ENStora
- Page 148 and 149: 144 Ecology PostersP EC.11 - ENCorr
- Page 150 and 151: 146 Ecology PostersP EC.15 - ENRele
- Page 152 and 153: 148 Ecology PostersP EC.20 - ENA ne
- Page 154 and 155: 150 Morphology Posters
- Page 156 and 157: 152 Morphology PostersP MO.3 - ENFr
- Page 158 and 159: 154 Morphology Postersbody contract
- Page 160 and 161: 156 Morphology Postersspecializatio
- Page 162 and 163: 158 Morphology Postersis reflected
- Page 164 and 165: 160 Morphology PostersP MO.20 - ENP
- Page 166 and 167: 162 Morphology PostersP MO.24 - ENT
- Page 168 and 169: 164 Morphology PostersP MO.28 - ENK
- Page 170 and 171: 166 Morphology Postershave, unlike
- Page 172 and 173: 168 Morphology Postersmosses etc).
- Page 174 and 175: 170 Neurobiology Posters
122 Developmental Biology PostersP DB.7 - ENSomite fate mapping using GFP-transgenic axolotlsNadine Piekarski, Lennart Olsson1Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie mit Phyletischem Museum, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaSingle somite fate has been studied extensively using quail-chick chimeras. We are interested in towhat degree somite fate is conserved despite the conspicuous differences in morphology seen amongvertebrates. Therefore, we have focused our study on a urodele amphibian, the Mexican axolotl, inwhich long-term fate mapping is technically feasible. Compared to birds the axolotl is morphologicallyvery different e.g. in many skeletal muscles and in skeletal elements of the occipital region,as well as in the shoulder girdle, all known to be somitic derivatives from quail-chick chimeras.Somites two to six were fate-mapped by transplantation of single somites from GFP-transgenicaxolotls. Transplanted fluorescent somites and their derivatives were tracked in vivo, and cryosectionswere made. Our data reveal a highly conserved pattern of somitic derivatives among the twospecies. The shoulder girdle in axolotls for example has a segmental (more than one somite) and acomposite (somites and lateral plate) origin exactly as in chicken. However, there are small differencesthat could be caused by the different position in which it is being formed in the two species.We also found differences in the specific formation of the hypobranchial chord that gives rise tohypobranchial muscles. Our results support a conserved pattern of somitic derivatives, however, thesmall differences observed could be the key to understand the developmental basis of evolutionarychange in this system.P DB.8 - ENThe Hydra-FGFR Kringelchen partially rescues the htl- but not the btl-mutantphentotype of Drosophila melanogasterAnja Rudolf, Christine Hübinger, Katrin Hüsken, Angelika Vogt, Christian Hasse, Susanne Önel,Renate Renkawitz-Pohl, Monika HasselFachbereich 17, Philipps-Universität MarburgFibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are important regulators during axis formation, cell migrationand branching morphogenesis in embryogenesis throughout the animal kingdom (1). FGFRare receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) and display a highly conserved structure: two juxtamembraneIg-like loops bind FGF ligands, the intracellular split tyrosine kinase domain is highly conservedand SH2 and SH3-domain consensus sequences couple signalling to either ras/MAPK, PI-PKC orPI-3 kinase signalling. The Hydra vulgaris FGFR homologue Kringelchen controls detachment ofvegetatively growing young polyps (2). It was the first ancient FGFR that had been characterizedand was present in cnidaria already about 650 mya – long before bilateral-symmetric animals hadsplit off. We have used Drosophila melanogaster to investigate if Kringelchen can act as a prototypeFGFR and functionally replace one or both of the Drosophila FGFR Breathless (Btl) or Heartless(Htl) (3,4). To this end we established Gal-4-UAS fly lines transgenic for the Kringelchen proteinand crossed to null mutants of either of the two Drosophila FGFR. We show that Kringelchen selectivelysubstitutes for Htl- but not for Btl-signalling, which indicates specific functional conservationof FGFR signalling.