Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft Abstracts - Deutsche Zoologische Gesellschaft
112 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.15 - ENMotor abilities of juvenile laboratory rats from litters of different sizesSusann Meyer, Heiko RödelLehrstuhl Tierphysiologie, Universität BayreuthLitter size of most small mammal species is highly variable. Offspring from larger litters usuallyreceive a lower share of milk leading to lower pre-weaning growth, which may influence the physicalcapabilities of the young shortly after weaning. On the other hand, a higher number of siblingsmay positively affect the motor development of the juveniles by higher rates of behavioural interactionswith their litter mates. We tested the motor skills and strengths of juvenile laboratory rats fromlitters of different sizes (3 to 17 pups/litter) around and shortly after weaning by behavioural tests.The latency time of jumping down from an elevated platform or out of their opened home cage waspositively correlated with litter size. Furthermore, we found a non-linear effect of litter size on thejuveniles’ strength in relation to their body mass, tested by the time they managed to stay attached toan elevated vertical wooden bar. Generally, young rats from large litters fell down earlier from thebar than the ones with less siblings, whereas juveniles from very small litters of 3 or 4 pups also felldown very fast, most likely due to their very high body masses. In conclusion, our study shows thatjuveniles from smaller litters had better motor skills and strength, most probably due to their betterphysical development. However, a very high body mass, as it occurs in juveniles from extremelysmall litters, might negatively affect their physical capabilities shortly after weaning.P BB.16 - ENLearning in freshwater stingrays (Potomotrygon falcneri)Kerstin Elisabeth Thonhauser 1 , Karl Kral 1 , Michael Kuba 21Institut für Zoologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria; 2 Department of Neurobiology,Hebrew University, Jerusalem, IsraelTesting the behavioral abilities of cartilaginous fish is an important step towards understanding theevolutionary origins of cognitive functions in higher vertebrates. In our study we used 7 SouthAmerican fresh water stingrays (Potomotrygon falcneri) in a social learning and problem-solvingtask. We used a tube apparatus developed for testing the cognitive abilities of aquatic animals. 3 animalswhere chosen as demonstrators that initially learnt to handle the tube and extract a food reward.After the demonstrators had reached criterion the 4 observer animals were positioned to watch themperform trials. The observers were then tested on their ability to learn to handle the tube and extractfood. Comparison showed significant differences between demonstrator and observer groups. Observersrequired less trials to reach criterion (p = 0.0023) and shorter trial duration (p = 0.0005). Thetwo groups also showed a significant difference in acquiring the best strategy for food extraction.This study is the first conclusive evidence of imitation learning in fish.
Behavioral Biology Posters 113P BB.17 - ENEntraining behaviour of trout exposed to unsteady flowsAnja Przybilla 1 , Horst Bleckmann 1 , Sebastian Kunze 2 , Christoph Brücker 21Institut für Zoologie, Universität Bonn; 2 Institut für Mechanik und Fluiddynamik, TechnischeUniversität FreibergTrout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) alter their body kinematics if exposed to unsteady flows. We studiedthe swimming behaviour of trout exposed to a Kármán vortex street generated with a cylinder (diameter5 cm) placed in running water. To save energy trout exposed to a Kármán vortex street eitheruse the region of reduced flow behind (drafting) or in front of the cylinder (bow wake). In additionthey may use the flow field around the cylinder (entraining) or they adapt their axial body kinematicsto the vortices shed by the cylinder (Kármán gait). While Kármán gaiting has been investigated indetail little is known about the energetic advantage trout gain while entraining. We found entrainingtrout move into a stable position beneath the cylinder where they can keep for a certain time astraight body profile without any action of the tail or body fins. Calculations of the forces acting onan entraining trout suggest an adaptation to the pressure field around the fish´s body such that dragforce is balanced.P BB.18 - ENInfluence of obstacles in the water flow on the swimming behaviour of four EuropeanCyprinid speciesBernd Baier, Horst Bleckmann, Joachim MogdansUniversität BonnFish in flowing water can reduce their energy expenditure by actively seeking regions with benefitingflow regimes, for instance behind an obstacle. We compared the behaviour of four Cyprindspecies towards cylinders of different diameter in a flow tank. In the literature these species areassigned to different habitat preference classes: Rhodeus sericeus, limnophilic; Leuciscus leuciscus,limnophilic/ indifferent; Gobio gobio, rheophilic/ indifferent and Phoxinus phoxinus, rheophilic.We found significant differences between species in the time spent in different tank areas and thedistances travelled. A detailed video analysis of the swimming behaviour behind cylinders revealedmotor patterns closely resembling the Kármán gait. Seemingly G. gobio and Ph. phoxinus were ableto exploit wall effects in the tank to reduce their swimming effort, consequently spending only ashort time interacting with the cylinders. L. leucisucs spent significantly more time behind cylindersactively using the vortex street. R. sericeus travelled the longest distances, exhibiting many episodesof burst swimming followed by drifting, which possibly indicates a low adaptation towards flowingwater. We are now conducting experiments with pharmacologically blocked lateral line and inhibitedvision, to quantify the contribution of different sensory information to the positioning behaviour.
- Page 66 and 67: 62 Ecology Symposium
- Page 68 and 69: 64 Morphology Symposium
- Page 70 and 71: 66 Morphology SymposiumO MO.3 (Su)
- Page 72 and 73: 68 Morphology SymposiumO MO.7 (Mo)
- Page 74 and 75: 70 Morphology SymposiumO MO.11 (Mo)
- Page 76 and 77: 72 Morphology SymposiumO MO.15 (Mo)
- Page 78 and 79: 74 Neurobiology Symposium
- Page 80 and 81: 76 Neurobiology SymposiumO NB.3 (Su
- Page 83 and 84: Physiology Symposium 79Physiology S
- Page 85 and 86: Physiology Symposium 81O PH.1 (Sa)
- Page 87 and 88: Physiology Symposium 83O PH.5 (Sa)
- Page 89 and 90: Physiology Symposium 85O PH.9 (Sa)
- Page 91 and 92: Physiology Symposium 87especially c
- Page 93: Physiology Symposium 89O PH.17 (Mo)
- Page 96 and 97: 92 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 98 and 99: 94 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 100 and 101: 96 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 102 and 103: 98 Zoological Systematics Symposium
- Page 104 and 105: 100 Zoological Systematics Symposiu
- Page 106 and 107: 102 Zoological Systematics Symposiu
- Page 108 and 109: 104 Behavioral Biology Posters
- Page 110 and 111: 106 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 112 and 113: 108 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 114 and 115: 110 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 118 and 119: 114 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 120 and 121: 116 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.
- Page 122 and 123: 118 Developmental Biology Posters
- Page 124 and 125: 120 Developmental Biology PostersP
- Page 126 and 127: 122 Developmental Biology PostersP
- Page 128 and 129: 124 Evolutionary Biology Posters
- Page 130 and 131: 126 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 132 and 133: 128 Evolutionary Biology Postersnum
- Page 134 and 135: 130 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 136 and 137: 132 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 138 and 139: 134 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 140 and 141: 136 Evolutionary Biology PostersP E
- Page 142 and 143: 138 Ecology Posters
- Page 144 and 145: 140 Ecology PostersP EC.3 - ENLife
- Page 146 and 147: 142 Ecology PostersP EC.7 - ENStora
- Page 148 and 149: 144 Ecology PostersP EC.11 - ENCorr
- Page 150 and 151: 146 Ecology PostersP EC.15 - ENRele
- Page 152 and 153: 148 Ecology PostersP EC.20 - ENA ne
- Page 154 and 155: 150 Morphology Posters
- Page 156 and 157: 152 Morphology PostersP MO.3 - ENFr
- Page 158 and 159: 154 Morphology Postersbody contract
- Page 160 and 161: 156 Morphology Postersspecializatio
- Page 162 and 163: 158 Morphology Postersis reflected
- Page 164 and 165: 160 Morphology PostersP MO.20 - ENP
112 Behavioral Biology PostersP BB.15 - ENMotor abilities of juvenile laboratory rats from litters of different sizesSusann Meyer, Heiko RödelLehrstuhl Tierphysiologie, Universität BayreuthLitter size of most small mammal species is highly variable. Offspring from larger litters usuallyreceive a lower share of milk leading to lower pre-weaning growth, which may influence the physicalcapabilities of the young shortly after weaning. On the other hand, a higher number of siblingsmay positively affect the motor development of the juveniles by higher rates of behavioural interactionswith their litter mates. We tested the motor skills and strengths of juvenile laboratory rats fromlitters of different sizes (3 to 17 pups/litter) around and shortly after weaning by behavioural tests.The latency time of jumping down from an elevated platform or out of their opened home cage waspositively correlated with litter size. Furthermore, we found a non-linear effect of litter size on thejuveniles’ strength in relation to their body mass, tested by the time they managed to stay attached toan elevated vertical wooden bar. Generally, young rats from large litters fell down earlier from thebar than the ones with less siblings, whereas juveniles from very small litters of 3 or 4 pups also felldown very fast, most likely due to their very high body masses. In conclusion, our study shows thatjuveniles from smaller litters had better motor skills and strength, most probably due to their betterphysical development. However, a very high body mass, as it occurs in juveniles from extremelysmall litters, might negatively affect their physical capabilities shortly after weaning.P BB.16 - ENLearning in freshwater stingrays (Potomotrygon falcneri)Kerstin Elisabeth Thonhauser 1 , Karl Kral 1 , Michael Kuba 21Institut für Zoologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria; 2 Department of Neurobiology,Hebrew University, Jerusalem, IsraelTesting the behavioral abilities of cartilaginous fish is an important step towards understanding theevolutionary origins of cognitive functions in higher vertebrates. In our study we used 7 SouthAmerican fresh water stingrays (Potomotrygon falcneri) in a social learning and problem-solvingtask. We used a tube apparatus developed for testing the cognitive abilities of aquatic animals. 3 animalswhere chosen as demonstrators that initially learnt to handle the tube and extract a food reward.After the demonstrators had reached criterion the 4 observer animals were positioned to watch themperform trials. The observers were then tested on their ability to learn to handle the tube and extractfood. Comparison showed significant differences between demonstrator and observer groups. Observersrequired less trials to reach criterion (p = 0.0023) and shorter trial duration (p = 0.0005). Thetwo groups also showed a significant difference in acquiring the best strategy for food extraction.This study is the first conclusive evidence of imitation learning in fish.