10.07.2015 Views

asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ...

asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ...

asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

height variation, say. across the width of a large room. You can either providean inset map with ceiling contours, or you can provide numbers.My "bedrock floor" symbol is from Vineyard.21In summary: I like several of your suggestions, and I have a few <strong>for</strong> youwhich shouldn't do too much violence to the AMCS system. Please consider myarguments where I still disagree and fire off another round of discussion.My cover letter to the BOG, which went o<strong>ut</strong> last week with copies of myrevised map list (the one I sent to you this year) states that AMCS is going topropose their list as a substit<strong>ut</strong>e "NSS Standard." If you're not there, I hope youcan arrange <strong>for</strong> someone to provide copies to the BOG be<strong>for</strong>e the meeting is over, sothat the AMCS list can be considered, or sent to committee, or whatever is done abo<strong>ut</strong>this next time around.Speleologically,JimComments on Hedges' LetterBy Bill RussellThe detailed comments were especially welcome and from communications abetter list should develop. I like the new pillar representation -- in most mapswhere floor detail is shown it is not necessary to show the walls as the "<strong>cave</strong>" isfull of symbols and stands o<strong>ut</strong> well, b<strong>ut</strong> where it is necessary to show pillars thenew symbol is good. The upper level and lower level symbols actually are used onlywhere passages cross and do not imply a "level" b<strong>ut</strong> only a crossing above or below.The wording on the new list has been changed so as to make this more obvious. Incomplex vertical <strong>cave</strong>s with several superimposed levels the plan view of the entire<strong>cave</strong> frequently can give only the horizontal exten~ of the <strong>cave</strong>, with most of thedetail given in profiles, insets, and cross sections. The objection that the AMeSsymbol <strong>for</strong> flowstone resembles an inkblot does not seem valid as unwanted ink blotsare rare and easily removed. The AMCS list uses a solid hatchured line <strong>for</strong> pits belowthe floor level and broken hatchured lines <strong>for</strong> domes, and combinations of these <strong>for</strong>a dome pit. Several years ago the AMCS decided to use broken hatchures <strong>for</strong> ceilingfeatures and the first used a dot between the hatchures, b<strong>ut</strong> these were hard to drawand were omitted. Hedges should be aware that most <strong>cave</strong>rs use "syphon" to mean apassage full of water, whether or not any syphoning action takes place. The AMCSlist follows this common usage. Geology symbols should be included on the basic list;any surveyor who is able to map a <strong>cave</strong> can measure strike and dip. A dome pit is adistinctive feature that c<strong>ut</strong>s through preexisting <strong>cave</strong> levels and perhaps a uniquesymbol should be provided <strong>for</strong> this, as <strong>for</strong> example, ~ , b<strong>ut</strong> many compromisesare possible. Water seems to be the main problem, and a discussion ofwater symbols follows excerpts from Hedges' article on <strong>cave</strong> maps.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!