asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ...

asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ... asscciation for mexican cave studies box 7672 ut station austin ...

amcs.pubs.org
from amcs.pubs.org More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

18Many of the symbols on the Hedges list could be improved, and others arein conflict with symbols widely used by cave mappers. One of the worst featuresof the Hedges list is its representation of domes. A dome should have a uniquesymbol and not depend upon the user to look around for a circled number. Nu~bers should be avoided whenever possible, but this system is especially cumbersome,particularly in view of the AMCS alternative, to use the broken hatchuredline to indicate a dome, just as it is used for other ceiling features.Hedges revised list uses a number in a square to indicate pit depth, and a numberin a circle with a line under it to indicate the height of a dome. r- 1 Thesecumbersome symbols would not be necessary if the broken hatchured line~~were used to show a dome as the poorly chosen symbol used by Hedges ~ alsoindicates a mesa, so additional notations are necessary. Hedges' natural bridgesymbol is not needed and can only confuse, as it indicates a short section ofpassage between two drops, a common enough occurance in caves. If a naturalbrid2e is not present Hedges symbol will imply one. Using the AMCS list one needonly add· a lower level symbol and a natural bridge is unambiguously indicated.Hedges' notations for streams and pools, retained in his revised list, are hardto draw, and his pools are easily mistaken for large masses of flows tone , notcommon in the caves where Hedges usually maps, but an NSS list should be usefulover a wide area. His flows tone symbol could be improved, and a cave mapdraftsman should never break the wall line to show a flows tone covered wall asindicated on Hedges list. The crossed pick-ax and shovel should not be used torepresent a mine on a cave map; the symbol is used on surface maps of largeareas, and its use as shown on the Hedges list would be inappropriate. Theactual diggings should be shown with conventional symbols.The Hedges list also contains symbols that are confusing as they are usedby others to show a different feature. Especially poor is Hedges use of diagonallines to indicate a bed rock pillar as this symbol is widely used to indicatewater. And the small solid triangles are used by many to indicate stalagmitesand should not be used for chert.The notation on the 1961 list that feet are to be used unless otherwisenoted will cause trouble in an increasingly metric world. I hope this featureis not retained in his revised list; my copy makes no mention of units. ConsideringHedges' French equivalents on the 1961 list (a sump is also a voutemovillante) he should realize that many people routinely use the metric system.So until the far distant future when inches and feet are as rare as leaguesand varas, there will be an uncertainty about what units are being used on amap, unless they are explicitly stated. There are several approaches to thisproblem. One is to use as few numbers as possible and rely on the graphic scale.It should be possible to interpret a cave map without any reference to figureson the map other than the graphic scale. Passage heights and pit depths shouldbe clear from cross sections and profiles. But while numbers should not be necessary,they are useful as they provide the user with exact dimensions. Everymap should contain a clear expression of whether feet or meters are used. Onecannot rely on the Hedges system of assuming measurements are in feet unlessindicated. I doubt if a caver who rappelled off the end of his 150 foot rope841 c::: I0·..····: :-;:',':-5 6Simbolos: 1, pared de In cueva; 2 formociones secul1,}orias; 3. derrumbe!l; 4 corde del techo en1a boca de Ia luevo; 5 pendieme; 6 tierra; 7 a:Hstres cOn:i()lidados de origen fluvial.Cuban Cave Hap Svmbols

19in a 90 meter pit could collect damages either from the map maker or Mr. Hedges,but with foresight these problems can be minimized.The revised Hedges list is an improvement over the 1961 list presented hereas he now uses the broken hatchures for ceiling features, but he needs to expandits use and use it for all ceiling features including domes. Cross sections arethe best way to show heights of domes and depths of pits when the shaft extendsboth above and below the passage. His revised list also includes a symbol lackingon the 1961 list, a symbol for a bed rock floor. He proposes a rectilinearcrosshatch be used, but even he admits it is a poor symbol, and suggests that itbe used only when absolute~y necessary, that normally if floor sediments are mappeda blank space will represent a bed rock floor. This is a poor practice as cavemappers frequently do not have data for some of the cave, a good bed rock floorsymbol would be much better. Hedges new list still has a cumbersome system forindicating pits and domes, as well as other symbols that are confusing or inappropriate.It should not be adopted as a standard list by the NSS as it would notmeet with general acceptance, and would be a setback to the slow progress beingmade towards the adoption of a uniform system of map symbols. The set of symbolsused by the AMCS should be adopted as it is a versatile and practical system inwide use and acceptable to a greater number of cavers.E X P l I C A C I O'N.J LEntradaPendientefurrtrff.. •.lZSe c cionmAUuro del hc"oTBlocho bolojlEntrada~.DecliveillAltura delT.B.TechobojotechoEXP:"ICACION} r-E·"roclct9". Declive;..-~P~IIC:I'''f'~".rt.EXPLICACION;; rEnl, ado'0DecliveAllura del 'echoLimi'!'e deJutGravaCohJClQEstociontopoQn:ifico~ColadoColumnabeUolo;mitico---Arcillo 0 bortOCorte a piceAQuafstoncoda~Agua esta~ada~Pendiente fuertex~Cruce baj 0 nivelTA-mA~~l,lro .::1\'1 r.eho80rro 0 QrC:llloCorte Qplco~Cruce bajo nivelAQueAQuaestoncodacorrienff''EstaeiontopogroficaROCClIPOZO.....'Ob'furOdOMexican Cave ~~pSymbols

18Many of the symbols on the Hedges list could be improved, and others arein conflict with symbols widely used by <strong>cave</strong> mappers. One of the worst featuresof the Hedges list is its representation of domes. A dome should have a uniquesymbol and not depend upon the user to look around <strong>for</strong> a circled number. Nu~bers should be avoided whenever possible, b<strong>ut</strong> this system is especially cumbersome,particularly in view of the AMCS alternative, to use the broken hatchuredline to indicate a dome, just as it is used <strong>for</strong> other ceiling features.Hedges revised list uses a number in a square to indicate pit depth, and a numberin a circle with a line under it to indicate the height of a dome. r- 1 Thesecumbersome symbols would not be necessary if the broken hatchured line~~were used to show a dome as the poorly chosen symbol used by Hedges ~ alsoindicates a mesa, so additional notations are necessary. Hedges' natural bridgesymbol is not needed and can only confuse, as it indicates a short section ofpassage between two drops, a common enough occurance in <strong>cave</strong>s. If a naturalbrid2e is not present Hedges symbol will imply one. Using the AMCS list one needonly add· a lower level symbol and a natural bridge is unambiguously indicated.Hedges' notations <strong>for</strong> streams and pools, retained in his revised list, are hardto draw, and his pools are easily mistaken <strong>for</strong> large masses of flows tone , notcommon in the <strong>cave</strong>s where Hedges usually maps, b<strong>ut</strong> an NSS list should be usefulover a wide area. His flows tone symbol could be improved, and a <strong>cave</strong> mapdraftsman should never break the wall line to show a flows tone covered wall asindicated on Hedges list. The crossed pick-ax and shovel should not be used torepresent a mine on a <strong>cave</strong> map; the symbol is used on surface maps of largeareas, and its use as shown on the Hedges list would be inappropriate. Theactual diggings should be shown with conventional symbols.The Hedges list also contains symbols that are confusing as they are usedby others to show a different feature. Especially poor is Hedges use of diagonallines to indicate a bed rock pillar as this symbol is widely used to indicatewater. And the small solid triangles are used by many to indicate stalagmitesand should not be used <strong>for</strong> chert.The notation on the 1961 list that feet are to be used unless otherwisenoted will cause trouble in an increasingly metric world. I hope this featureis not retained in his revised list; my copy makes no mention of units. ConsideringHedges' French equivalents on the 1961 list (a sump is also a vo<strong>ut</strong>emovillante) he should realize that many people ro<strong>ut</strong>inely use the metric system.So until the far distant f<strong>ut</strong>ure when inches and feet are as rare as leaguesand varas, there will be an uncertainty abo<strong>ut</strong> what units are being used on amap, unless they are explicitly stated. There are several approaches to thisproblem. One is to use as few numbers as possible and rely on the graphic scale.It should be possible to interpret a <strong>cave</strong> map witho<strong>ut</strong> any reference to figureson the map other than the graphic scale. Passage heights and pit depths shouldbe clear from cross sections and profiles. B<strong>ut</strong> while numbers should not be necessary,they are useful as they provide the user with exact dimensions. Everymap should contain a clear expression of whether feet or meters are used. Onecannot rely on the Hedges system of assuming measurements are in feet unlessindicated. I doubt if a <strong>cave</strong>r who rappelled off the end of his 150 foot rope841 c::: I0·..····: :-;:',':-5 6Simbolos: 1, pared de In cueva; 2 <strong>for</strong>mociones secul1,}orias; 3. derrumbe!l; 4 corde del techo en1a boca de Ia luevo; 5 pendieme; 6 tierra; 7 a:Hstres cOn:i()lidados de origen fluvial.Cuban Cave Hap Svmbols

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!