2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility
2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility 2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility
2010 Progress ReportFacility1. Developingpartnershipsbetween theFacility andeligiblecountriesInterventionLogic1.1 Invitingcountries toapplyObjectivelyVerifiable Indicators− Number ofcountries invited− Nature andnumber ofinitiatives/eventsused to publicizeFacility support tocountriesReporting against Logical Framework− Official letters of invitation were sent (through the FAO or UNDPCountry Offices) to all 108 eligible countries (Medium and Low HumanDevelopment Index); 95 of these countries have replied by sending aproposal (Concept Note); 70 are now partners; of the 49 LeastDeveloped Countries (LDC), 34 are Facility partner (or 69% of allLDCs).− The Facility website and Flyer, international events such as the WorldForestry Congress, CLI, COFO, FAO’s Regional Commissions, UNFF,UNCCC-Bali, etc.Sources of Verification− Facility Progress Reports− Facility Country SupportDatabase− Reports from the NMSCs− Reports from RecipientOrganizations (receivingFacility grants)− In 2010, the Facility coaches have visited the Facility PartnerCountries at least once (except some countries for security reasons,and some non-responding countries).− Back to Office Reports fromFacility “coaches”2. Supportingstakeholders inpartnercountries1.2 Evaluatingapplications− Number ofapplicationsreceived; qualityand relevance ofConcept Notesand correspondingapplications− Number ofrespectivedecisions of theSteeringCommittee andFacilitymanagement− 95 countries and 7 sub-regional organizations have applied for FacilityPartnerships by submitting a Concept Note− 70 partner countries and 4 partner Regional organizations wereselected after a ranking and selection process in differentprioritization sessions spread over 8 years. In detail:2002: 8 partners admitted: Chile, China, ACICAFOC, Malawi,Mongolia, Nigeria, Thailand, Tanzania2003 (June): 7 partners admitted: CCAD, Ghana, Indonesia, Mali,Namibia, Philippines, Senegal2003 (December): 15 partners admitted: Colombia, Cuba, DR Congo,Ecuador, Honduras, Kenya, Lesotho, Morocco, Mozambique, Niger,Paraguay, Rwanda, South Africa, Tunisia, Uganda2004: 8 partners admitted: Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala,Georgia, Jamaica, Pakistan, Sudan, Vanuatu2005: 8 partners admitted: Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Nicaragua, Palau,Viet Nam, Zambia, SPC, CANARI2007: 11 countries admitted: Sierra Leone, Angola, Ethiopia,Uzbekistan, Dominican Rep., Nepal, Guinea, El Salvador, Laos,Cambodia, Belize2008: 4 countries were admitted: Benin, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Yemen− Concept Notes received− Proposals received− Signed PartnershipAgreements− Signed Second PhasePartnership Agreements− Appendixes of thePartnership Agreements(Monitoring tool)− Workshop reports andproceedings− 2009: 13 new countries have been accepted as partner, based on theConcept Note (Bhutan, Bolivia, Burundi, Cape Verde, Côte d’Ivoire,Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Peru, Suriname, Togo, andZimbabwe)− Scored indicators in thenfp-matrix, done in aparticipatory way, duringNMSC meeting or wkshop2010: no new partner countries were accepted44
2010 Progress ReportFacilityInterventionLogic1.3 Establishing andsupportingpartnershipsObjectivelyVerifiable Indicators− Number ofpartnershipagreementsconcluded withcountriesReporting against Logical Framework− 70 countries have signed a partnership agreement; 4 RegionalEntities are also Facility Partners;− 2008: 2 partnerships (Honduras and Guatemala) were approved for asecond Facility Partnership Agreement;Sources of Verification− The Appendix to the FacilityAgreement, which is part ofit1.4 Monitoring andevaluatingimplementation− Number ofpartnershipagreementsextended− Number of “Nfp’sfor All” InitialTrainingworkshops− Quantitative andqualitativeassessments ofthe achievementsof thepartnershipsagainst theirstated objectives.− 2009: another 7 partner countries received a second PartnershipAgreement (China, Ecuador, Nigeria, Paraguay, Tanzania, Uganda,Zambia);− 2010: another 5 partner countries and 1 partner organisationreceived a 2nd Partnership Agreement (Mozambique, Nicaragua,Pakistan, Senegal, Sudan and ACICAFOC)− “Nfp’s for All” was organized up till now in 40 countries (Kenya,Thailand, Nigeria, Pakistan, Mauritius, Namibia, Indonesia, Sudan,Serbia, Zambia, Chile, Guatemala, Sierra Leone, Angola, Uzbekistan,Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Laos, Cambodia, Belize; Malawi,Nepal, Benin, Burkina Faso, Yemen, Brazil, Ethiopia; and the admittedpartners of 2009 (Bhutan, Bolivia, Burundi, Cape Verde, Côted’Ivoire, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Peru, Suriname, Togo, andZimbabwe)− The concept of Outcome and Impact Monitoring and EvaluationSystem (OIMES) which is closely related to Result Based Management(RBM) was developed in 2007, but the modus operandi of OIMES andthe first field tests were established in 2008 in Guatemala andHonduras.− In 2010, OIMES/RBM was applied in all countries and is now madecompulsory for all new LoAs signed in 2010. Key elements inOIMES/RBM are the “in-country self-evaluation” of the past Facilitysupport, the lessons learned workshop to discuss the new direction ofthe nfp process in the country, and the nfp-update which has the nfpmatrixas an important element. The latter shows in a quantitativeway how vibrant the nfp process is. The matrix is in fact a gapanalysis and shows the areas where Facility support is needed (nowand in the future) to improve the nfp process. The criteria of thematrix on which action will be undertaken (through a Letter ofAgreement) will be clearly shown as an annex to the contract. Whenthe work of the stakeholder is over, the NMSC will judge if the scoreson these particular indicators have been changed.45
- Page 1 and 2: 2010 Progress Report - Draft
- Page 3 and 4: 2010 Progress ReportTable of conten
- Page 5: 2010 Progress Report2010 - Reflecti
- Page 8 and 9: 62010 Progress Report
- Page 10 and 11: 2010 Progress ReportFAO supportAs i
- Page 12 and 13: 2010 Progress Report“nfp in pract
- Page 14 and 15: 2010 Progress ReportTable 1: Admiss
- Page 16 and 17: 2010 Progress ReportDistribution of
- Page 18 and 19: 2010 Progress ReportCambodia:Promot
- Page 20 and 21: 2010 Progress Reportdeveloping coun
- Page 22 and 23: 2010 Progress ReportFacility suppor
- Page 24 and 25: 2010 Progress ReportA participatory
- Page 26 and 27: 2010 Progress ReportFacility Websit
- Page 28 and 29: 2010 Progress Report“Forest and W
- Page 30 and 31: 282010 Progress Report
- Page 32 and 33: 2010 Progress ReportTable 3: Facili
- Page 34 and 35: 2010 Progress ReportTable 4: Facili
- Page 36 and 37: 2010 Progress ReportNote: Figures i
- Page 38 and 39: 362010 Progress Report
- Page 40 and 41: 2010 Progress ReportAsia PacificCou
- Page 42 and 43: 2010 Progress ReportANNEX IIIFacili
- Page 44 and 45: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityProgram
- Page 48 and 49: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityInterve
- Page 50 and 51: 2010 Progress ReportFacility3. Web
- Page 52 and 53: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityActivit
<strong>2010</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> <strong>Report</strong><strong>Facility</strong>InterventionLogic1.3 Establishing andsupportingpartnershipsObjectivelyVerifiable Indicators− Number ofpartnershipagreementsconcluded withcountries<strong>Report</strong>ing against Logical Framework− 70 countries have signed a partnership agreement; 4 RegionalEntities are also <strong>Facility</strong> Partners;− 2008: 2 partnerships (Honduras and Guatemala) were approved for asecond <strong>Facility</strong> Partnership Agreement;Sources of Verification− The Appendix to the <strong>Facility</strong>Agreement, which is part ofit1.4 Monitoring andevaluatingimplementation− Number ofpartnershipagreementsextended− Number of “Nfp’sfor All” InitialTrainingworkshops− Quantitative andqualitativeassessments ofthe achievementsof thepartnershipsagainst theirstated objectives.− 2009: another 7 partner countries received a second PartnershipAgreement (China, Ecuador, Nigeria, Paraguay, Tanzania, Uganda,Zambia);− <strong>2010</strong>: another 5 partner countries and 1 partner organisationreceived a 2nd Partnership Agreement (Mozambique, Nicaragua,Pakistan, Senegal, Sudan and ACICAFOC)− “Nfp’s for All” was organized up till now in 40 countries (Kenya,Thailand, Nigeria, Pakistan, Mauritius, Namibia, Indonesia, Sudan,Serbia, Zambia, Chile, Guatemala, Sierra Leone, Angola, Uzbekistan,Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Laos, Cambodia, Belize; Malawi,Nepal, Benin, Burkina Faso, Yemen, Brazil, Ethiopia; and the admittedpartners of 2009 (Bhutan, Bolivia, Burundi, Cape Verde, Côted’Ivoire, Gambia, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Peru, Suriname, Togo, andZimbabwe)− The concept of Outcome and Impact Monitoring and EvaluationSystem (OIMES) which is closely related to Result Based Management(RBM) was developed in 2007, but the modus operandi of OIMES andthe first field tests were established in 2008 in Guatemala andHonduras.− In <strong>2010</strong>, OIMES/RBM was applied in all countries and is now madecompulsory for all new LoAs signed in <strong>2010</strong>. Key elements inOIMES/RBM are the “in-country self-evaluation” of the past <strong>Facility</strong>support, the lessons learned workshop to discuss the new direction ofthe nfp process in the country, and the nfp-update which has the nfpmatrixas an important element. The latter shows in a quantitativeway how vibrant the nfp process is. The matrix is in fact a gapanalysis and shows the areas where <strong>Facility</strong> support is needed (nowand in the future) to improve the nfp process. The criteria of thematrix on which action will be undertaken (through a Letter ofAgreement) will be clearly shown as an annex to the contract. Whenthe work of the stakeholder is over, the NMSC will judge if the scoreson these particular indicators have been changed.45
Change language