2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2010 Progress ReportANNEX IIIFacility Partner Countries and their 2010 Human Development index rankingVery high Human DevelopmentNorwayAustraliaNew ZealandUnited States of AmericaIrelandLiechtensteinNetherlandsCanadaSwedenGermanyJapanKorea (Republic of)SwitzerlandFranceIsraelFinlandIcelandBelgiumDenmarkSpainHong Kong, China (SAR)GreeceItalyLuxembourgAustriaUnited KingdomSingaporeCzech RepublicSloveniaAndorraSlovakiaUnited Arab EmiratesMaltaEstoniaCyprusHungaryBrunei DarussalamQatarBahrainPortugalPolandBarbadosHigh Human DevelopmentBahamasLithuaniaChileArgentinaKuwaitLatviaMontenegroRomaniaCroatiaUruguayLibyaPanamaSaudi ArabiaMexicoMalaysiaBulgariaTrinidad and TobagoSerbiaBelarusCosta RicaPeruAlbaniaRussian FederationKazakhstanAzerbaijanBosnia and HerzegovinaUkraineIranMacedonia (FYRM)MauritiusBrazilGeorgiaVenezuelaArmeniaEcuadorBelizeColombiaJamaicaTunisiaJordanTurkeyAlgeriaTongaMedium Human Developm.FijiTurkmenistanDominican RepublicChinaEl SalvadorSri LankaThailandGabonSurinameBoliviaParaguayPhilippinesBotswanaMoldovaMongoliaEgyptUzbekistanMicronesiaGuyanaNamibiaHondurasMaldivesIndonesiaKyrgyzstanSouth AfricaSyrian Arab RepublicTajikistanViet NamMoroccoNicaraguaGuatemalaEquatorial GuineaCape VerdeIndiaTimor-LesteSwazilandLao People's Democratic RepublicSolomon IslandsCambodiaPakistanCongoSão Tomé and PríncipeLow Human DevelopmentKenyaBangladeshGhanaCameroonMyanmarYemenBeninMadagascarMauritaniaPapua New GuineaNepalTogoComorosLesothoNigeriaUgandaSenegalHaitiAngolaDjiboutiTanzaniaCôte d'IvoireZambiaGambiaRwandaMalawiSudanAfghanistanGuineaEthiopiaSierra LeoneCentral African RepublicMaliBurkina FasoLiberiaChadGuinea-BissauMozambiqueBurundiNigerCongo (Democratic Republic of the)Zimbabwe--------------------------------Bhutan HDI not quotedCuba HDI not quotedPalau HDI not quotedVanuatu HDI not quotedFacility Partner Countries (70)Bold are the countries covered throughSub-regional Partnerships40
2010 Progress ReportANNEX IVReporting against the Logical framework (2002-2010)FacilityOverall objectivesInterventionLogicSupporting forestpolicy planning andimplementationprocesses that:− Effectivelyaddress localneeds andnational priorities− Reflectinternationallyagreed principlesfor nationalforestprogrammes(nfp’s)− Involve allstakeholders insustainable forestmanagementObjectivelyVerifiable Indicators− Forest sector issuesin general and nfp’sin particular areintegrated intobroader nationalpolicies (e.g.,PRSPs)− Internationalagreements (e.g.,CBD, UNFCCC,UNCCD) arereflected in nationalforest policies andplanning− Mechanisms forstakeholderparticipation innfp’s areoperationalReporting against Logical Framework− Partner countries have made an effort to integrate nfp’s into broadernational strategies (poverty reduction, combating desertification, landuse planning), and inter-sector coordination in nfp implementation.There are also some examples of integrating internationalcommitments and Intergovernmental Panel on Forests (IPF) /Intergovernmental Forum on Forests (IFF) proposals for action innational policy development− International agreed principles (country ownership, participation andintegration into other sectors) for nfp and international agreementswere explained in the national forest policy context during training andinformation sessions (under “Nfp’s for all”)− In all the partner countries, National Multi-stakeholder SteeringCommittees (NMSC) were set-up or strengthened to guide the nfpprocess. Activities are implemented by a wide range of stakeholders− in 2010, FORIS calculated that the stakeholder composition in theNMSC in the Facility Partner countries is as follows:o Forestry Department (at national or federal level): 100%o Decentralised Forestry Department at provincial, district of statelevel: 40%o Other ministries (Ministry of Environment, Rural Development,Energy, Finance, Agriculture, etc.): 51%o Forest Research institution or institution for forest extension:61%o Forest Education and Academia (university, forestry school,training institute, etc.): 67%o Professional Associations: 26%o Non-governmental Organisations / Community basedOrganisations: 81%o Indigenous Peoples Groups: 14%o Private sector or private sector associations: 47%o International partners, donors (informed observers): 43%Sources of Verification− Nfp documents− National policy and strategydocuments− National action plans (e.g.,CBD and UNFCCC)− National budgets− Minutes of meetings of theNMSC41
Page 1 and 2: 2010 Progress Report - Draft
Page 3 and 4: 2010 Progress ReportTable of conten
Page 5: 2010 Progress Report2010 - Reflecti
Page 8 and 9: 62010 Progress Report
Page 10 and 11: 2010 Progress ReportFAO supportAs i
Page 12 and 13: 2010 Progress Report“nfp in pract
Page 14 and 15: 2010 Progress ReportTable 1: Admiss
Page 16 and 17: 2010 Progress ReportDistribution of
Page 18 and 19: 2010 Progress ReportCambodia:Promot
Page 20 and 21: 2010 Progress Reportdeveloping coun
Page 22 and 23: 2010 Progress ReportFacility suppor
Page 24 and 25: 2010 Progress ReportA participatory
Page 26 and 27: 2010 Progress ReportFacility Websit
Page 28 and 29: 2010 Progress Report“Forest and W
Page 32 and 33: 2010 Progress ReportTable 3: Facili
Page 34 and 35: 2010 Progress ReportTable 4: Facili
Page 36 and 37: 2010 Progress ReportNote: Figures i
Page 40 and 41: 2010 Progress ReportAsia PacificCou
Page 44 and 45: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityProgram
Page 46 and 47: 2010 Progress ReportFacility1. Deve
Page 48 and 49: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityInterve
Page 50 and 51: 2010 Progress ReportFacility3. Web
Page 52 and 53: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityActivit

2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility