2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2010 Progress ReportFAO supportAs in the past, the Facility continued to enjoy excellent working relations with the FAO Forestry Department inRome and, in particular, with the Forest Policy and Economics Division (FOEP):Mr. Marco Boscolo, National Forest Financing StrategiesMr. Fred Kafeero, Coach for Kenya, Zambia and UgandaMr. Arvydas Lebedys, Coach for Kyrgyzstan and UzbekistanMs. Qiang Ma, Coach for YemenMr. Rao Matta, National Forest Financing StrategiesMs. Eva Müller, Head, FOEPMr. Ewald Rametsteiner, Nfp Senior OfficerMr. Olman Serrano, Investment and Private Sector PartnershipsThe following Forest Officers, based at the FAO Regional and Sub-Regional Offices, devoted a significantportion of their time to the Facility in coaching Facility Partner Countries:Mr. Patrick Durst, coaching the PhilippinesMr. Claus Eckelmann, coaching Belize, Cuba, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, Surinam, Guyana and CANARIMr. Michel Laverdière, coaching Ethiopia, Rwanda, Burundi and Sudan (now retired)Mr. Aru Mathias, coaching Palau, Vanuatu and SPCMr. Jorge Meza, coaching Paraguay (became the FAO Representative for Paraguay)Mr. Jean-Claude Nguinguiri, coaching DRC and Republic of CongoMr. Dominique Reeb, coaching MongoliaMr. Fernando Salinas, coaching Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali and Sierra LeoneSee Annex II for a complete list of coaches per Facility Partner Country.Facility Team MeetingsMost Facility Coaches participated in the SC meeting in Rome in February 2010, followed by a 2-day trainingand team building session at HQ. The FORIS database and management tool was demonstrated and trainingwas conducted on the new modalities of OIMES/RBM. In addition, a training session was given by PROFOR onthe Forest Poverty Tool Kit.8
2010 Progress ReportOutcome and impact monitoring andevaluation system (OIMES)Result Based Management (RBM) and the OIMES have been continually developed and introduced since2008, and further implemented in 2010. It has been taken up by many countries as a tool for their ownmonitoring of the nfp process. It has brought insight to the stakeholders on the nfp framework and the realityand status of the nfp in the country.Coaches were trained in 2010 to insert data in the FORIS database (into which OIMES has been set up) onlinking the small grants to the country level nfp assessment (“the matrix”). The indicators of the nfp atnational level are assessed in nfp workshops by stakeholders when discussing progress and defining newpriorities.Distribution by main nfp principles of Facility supported activities in 2010Cluster 1: Country leadership, Cluster 2: Inter and intra-sectoral linkages, Cluster 3: Partnerships andparticipationAs could be expected, support has primarily been provided to the clusters covering partnerships andparticipation and country ownership. It is, however, worth noting that in Asia, the picture looks different.There, the much needed inter- and intra-sectoral linkages have received most of the support.Regarding the impact of Facility support on the nfp of partner countries, OIMES can give some indicationsonly at this stage. Only 9 countries (Angola, China, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Paraguayand South Africa) have, so far, completed 2 nfp assessments including the indicators selected for Facilitysupport. This small sample, nine countries, has given the following result with respect to Facility support tonfp implementation (see graph below).The graph shows that in those 9 countries, 81% of Facility supported activities have a focuson areas in which countries have difficulties.About 20% of activities supported are in areasalready showing a positive trend. Data frommany more countries will become availableduring 2011, and a thorough analysis of theimpact will then be undertaken. However,more analysis based on OIMES and othersurveys will be presented in the newpublication “nfps in practice” to be published inthe first half of 2011. See also the “NFPFacility-Beyond 2012, Background andProposal” document.Past trend of nfp implementation in 9countries supported by the Facility in 20109
Page 1 and 2: 2010 Progress Report - Draft
Page 3 and 4: 2010 Progress ReportTable of conten
Page 5: 2010 Progress Report2010 - Reflecti
Page 8 and 9: 62010 Progress Report
Page 12 and 13: 2010 Progress Report“nfp in pract
Page 14 and 15: 2010 Progress ReportTable 1: Admiss
Page 16 and 17: 2010 Progress ReportDistribution of
Page 18 and 19: 2010 Progress ReportCambodia:Promot
Page 20 and 21: 2010 Progress Reportdeveloping coun
Page 22 and 23: 2010 Progress ReportFacility suppor
Page 24 and 25: 2010 Progress ReportA participatory
Page 26 and 27: 2010 Progress ReportFacility Websit
Page 28 and 29: 2010 Progress Report“Forest and W
Page 32 and 33: 2010 Progress ReportTable 3: Facili
Page 34 and 35: 2010 Progress ReportTable 4: Facili
Page 36 and 37: 2010 Progress ReportNote: Figures i
Page 40 and 41: 2010 Progress ReportAsia PacificCou
Page 42 and 43: 2010 Progress ReportANNEX IIIFacili
Page 44 and 45: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityProgram
Page 46 and 47: 2010 Progress ReportFacility1. Deve
Page 48 and 49: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityInterve
Page 50 and 51: 2010 Progress ReportFacility3. Web
Page 52 and 53: 2010 Progress ReportFacilityActivit

2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?

2010 Progress Report â Draft - NFP Facility