1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ... - Star Tribune

CASE 0:11-cv-00646-JNE-TNL Document 26 36 Filed 01/04/12 03/15/12 Page 13 of 3569. Prior to his recorded interrogation of Ms. Crowder, Officer Menter requiresher to answer his questions “yes” on pain of losing custody of her minor children.70. Officer Menter refuses to record the entirety of his interrogation of Ms.Crowder, specifically, his order that she answer his questions in the affirmative, onpain of losing custody of her children.71. Officer Menter fails to advise Ms. Crowder of any rights, or right to have anattorney present, at any time, before commencement of the recorded interview.72. The recorded portion of the in-custody interrogation includes a recitation byOfficer Menter of Ms. Crowder’s rights to silence and the assistance of anattorney.73. Officers David Menter, David Loe, James Lynch, David Pleoger, ToddSauvageau, Gene Suker, Lawrence Loonsfoot, David Garman, Mike Nimlos, andLucas Peterson claim to be searching for a male named “Toby.”74. Officer Menter directly states to Ms. Crowder that if Ms. Crowder does notcooperate in getting “Toby” to be an informant for the police, Menter would takeaction to take away her minor children.75. The individual defendants find no “Toby” at the Crowder residence.76. “Toby” does not live at 3102 N. Queen Avenue.76. “Toby” Clarke lives at 1829 Fifth Avenue South in South Minneapolis at thetime of the execution of the search warrant.77. Officer Menter has actual knowledge of Mr. Clarke’s residence in SouthMinneapolis, before his interrogation of Ms. Crowder.13