10.07.2015 Views

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26ABSTRACTS OF SIKH STUDIES : JAN-MARCH <strong>2006</strong> / 537-38 NSarticles in Khalsa Samachar (These were later published in the form <strong>of</strong>a book, Prachin Biran Bare, Lahore, 1947) to show how baseless wereG B Singh’s observations about Kartarpuri Bir in their entirety. Hetook note <strong>of</strong> the rough language used by G B Singh. He mentionsthat some <strong>of</strong> the acquaintances <strong>of</strong> G B Singh told him that G B Singhwas not a <strong>Sikh</strong>, but an agnostic. According to his own admission, hehad taken baptism thrice, but thrice had become an apostate, and nowhad no intention to take baptism a fourth time. Pr<strong>of</strong> Sahib Singh’swork Aad Bir Bare (Amritsar, 1970 /1990) too makes critical referencesto G B Singh, especially his lack <strong>of</strong> faith in <strong>Sikh</strong>ism or <strong>Sikh</strong> Gurus.His agnosticism which caused him to caste aspersions on <strong>Sikh</strong> Gurusand Gurbani scriptures was the precise reason for his wild allegations.This brings us to another agnostic who started writing on <strong>Sikh</strong>ismin 1960s. This agnostic who started as a Christian Padri from a smallcountry, New Zealand, has had powerful connections, firstly, withWhites working at Baring Union Christian College, Batala, Punjab,and secondly, with ultra Hindu lobby which not only had developed apowerful bias against the <strong>Sikh</strong>s and <strong>Sikh</strong>ism, but also had the support<strong>of</strong> powerful Government <strong>of</strong> India and its intelligence setup, includingRAW, the external intelligence agency.W H Mcleod has written pr<strong>of</strong>usely on the <strong>Sikh</strong>s with malice. Bythe time he wrote on Guru Nanak for his Ph D in 1960s, according tohis own admission in his autobiography, he had become an agnostic.That showed that he had lost faith in Christianity, Christ and the Bible.These had earlier played a powerful role in framing his mind. Onemay take that at face value. It is surprising that one who loses faith inhis own religion / faith, should claim to understand, much less interpret,another faith or a powerful character like that <strong>of</strong> Guru Nanak. It wasnot surprising that whenever he sought to apply his mind to <strong>Sikh</strong>scriptures, his character as a doubting Thomas must have come to thefore, and made him a skeptic and a cynic.Now, we may bring in here the couplet in Rag Ramkali insertedby Guru Arjun Dev in Kartarpur Bir. Some <strong>of</strong> the handwritten versionsavailable elsewhere spuriously sought to project the whole <strong>of</strong> hymn,spelling out puberty rites <strong>of</strong> Guru Hargobind. W H McLeod had earlierwritten that he believed in the version <strong>of</strong> Kartarpur Bir as spelled outby Bhai Jodh Singh. Bhai Jodh Singh wrote that this couplet stood

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!