10.07.2015 Views

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

Jan-March 2006 - Institute of Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COMPILATION OF SRI GURU GRANTH SAHIB25On the contrary, hostile elements, especially Brahmins and Banias,assisted by such elements as having a grouse against <strong>Sikh</strong>ism, scannedthe countryside with the help <strong>of</strong> certain paid scribes and they removedcertain pages from existing recensions <strong>of</strong> various Pothis / Granths / SriGuru Granth Sahib, and put, in instead, a number <strong>of</strong> pages to show thecontinuity <strong>of</strong> handwriting by inserting certain hostile material, andcause distortions in <strong>Sikh</strong> ideology. This went on at a large scale,especially keeping in view the hostile atmosphere against <strong>Sikh</strong>ismduring the last phases <strong>of</strong> Guru Tegh Bahadur and Guru Gobind Singh,especially the first half <strong>of</strong> the 18th century. It is hardly possible foranyone to come across a handwritten recension that does not havespurious compositions, spelled out in first para Part V above.Same was the case with induction <strong>of</strong> Brahminism into <strong>Sikh</strong>ism.Some <strong>Sikh</strong> scholars, even men like Bhai Santokh Singh were carriedaway by the impact and expounded wrong <strong>Sikh</strong> ethos. It was theSingh Sabha Movement that put <strong>Sikh</strong>ism on the correct path. SinceKartarpur Pothi had certain in-built safeguards, it has been possible for<strong>Sikh</strong> people to remain on the right side <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong> religion and philosophy.The publication <strong>of</strong> G B Singh’s work Prachin Biran in 1944, basedon half-baked material, caused severe damage to <strong>Sikh</strong>ism. Firstly, hedid not see the Kartarpur Bir at all, and despite that chose to passcertain value judgements, that were uncalled for. He rather chose toput forth that Kartarpuri Bir had been destroyed. Secondly, he hadlittle time to study the numerous Birs, including Banno Bir recensions,but chose to pass on half-baked information that caused harm to the<strong>Sikh</strong> body politic.Lastly, he put forth that some <strong>of</strong> hymns <strong>of</strong> Guru Nanak had notbeen included in the <strong>Sikh</strong> scripture, and he cast aspersions on GuruArjun Dev’s finality <strong>of</strong> the product. He seemed to contend that heknew better than Guru Arjun Dev in the matter.Bhai Jodh Singh, Principal Khalsa College, Amritsar, along withPrincipal Ganga Singh <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sikh</strong> Missionary College, Amrtisar, and Pr<strong>of</strong>Teja Singh <strong>of</strong> Khalsa College, Amritsar, on behalf <strong>of</strong> Dharma PracharCommittee <strong>of</strong> SGPC had the opportunity to conduct a detailed study<strong>of</strong> Kartarpur recension for some days, and submitted a report onOctober 11, 1945. This caused Bhai Jodh Singh to write a series <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!