10.07.2015 Views

Trees and the Law - Alexandrina Council - SA.Gov.au

Trees and the Law - Alexandrina Council - SA.Gov.au

Trees and the Law - Alexandrina Council - SA.Gov.au

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Is <strong>the</strong> tree protected?While <strong>the</strong> law provides some remediesfor <strong>the</strong> benefit of a neighbour affected byproblems with a tree, it also provides ameasure of protection for <strong>the</strong> tree owner<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree.Action by neighbourThe neighbour affected by a tree nuisancesituation has limited rights to take actionagainst <strong>the</strong> tree.The right to cut back <strong>the</strong> tree is limited by:a) <strong>the</strong> possibility of being held liable fortrespass if <strong>the</strong> tree is cut beyond <strong>the</strong>boundary, <strong>and</strong>b) <strong>the</strong> possibility of being held liable fornegligence if <strong>the</strong> tree is unnecessarily<strong>and</strong> carelessly harmed bec<strong>au</strong>se of <strong>the</strong>way <strong>the</strong> job is done, <strong>and</strong>c) whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> tree is protected asa ‘significant tree’ <strong>and</strong> subject todevelopment controls.A claim for an order requiring <strong>the</strong> treeowner to do <strong>the</strong> pruning is only likelyto succeed if substantial or irreparabledamage is likely to occur soon. Orders forremoval of trees are even more difficult tojustify.It must be stressed that in nocircumstances is <strong>the</strong> affected neighbourlegally justified in poisoning <strong>the</strong> tree,or going on to or leaning over <strong>the</strong> treeowner’s l<strong>and</strong> to carry out work on <strong>the</strong>tree unless given specific permission todo so. Such action could result in a courtawarding compensation <strong>and</strong> exemplarydamages for trespass to discourage o<strong>the</strong>r12people from doing <strong>the</strong> same thing. 47 It is alsopossible that <strong>the</strong> neighbour could be chargedwith a criminal offence. There is no right togo on to neighbouring l<strong>and</strong> even to rectify adangerous problem with a tree which is nota nuisance: <strong>the</strong> only right <strong>the</strong> law providesis a claim for compensation if it actuallyfalls over <strong>and</strong> c<strong>au</strong>ses damage. Obviously, atimely warning to <strong>the</strong> tree owner will be <strong>the</strong>appropriate prec<strong>au</strong>tion.Significant treesThe Development Act 1993 provides thatany activity that damages a significant tree isdevelopment <strong>and</strong> requires council approval.A ‘significant tree’ is:• Any tree in metropolitan Adelaide <strong>and</strong>townships in <strong>the</strong> Mt Barker <strong>and</strong> AdelaideHills areas with a trunk circumference of2.0m or more. In <strong>the</strong> case of trees withmultiple trunks, those with trunks with atotal circumference of 2.0m or more <strong>and</strong>an average circumference of 625mm ormore, measured at a point 1.0m abovenatural ground level, or• Any tree identiied as a signiicant tree in<strong>the</strong> City of Adelaide, City of Burnside, Cityof Prospect or City of Unley DevelopmentPlans.If a tree is classified as a significant tree,local council approval is required before itcan be substantially pruned, damaged, killedor removed. Maintenance pruning that is notlikely to affect <strong>the</strong> health or appearance of<strong>the</strong> tree is not controlled. These requirementsapply both to tree owners <strong>and</strong> affectedneighbours.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!