20.11.2012 Views

Registration of Cultivar Names in Ulmus - Arnoldia - Harvard ...

Registration of Cultivar Names in Ulmus - Arnoldia - Harvard ...

Registration of Cultivar Names in Ulmus - Arnoldia - Harvard ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a tree with ascend<strong>in</strong>g branches but pendulous branchlets, slightly pubescent<br />

while young; leaves obovate to narrow-elliptic, 2-6 cm. long, acum<strong>in</strong>ate, <strong>in</strong>cised<br />

doubly serrate, scabrous above, slightly pubescent beneath. Said to have been<br />

raised by Mr. Masters <strong>in</strong> 1817. Usually treated as a variety <strong>of</strong> U. procera but<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Dr. Melville this is <strong>of</strong> hybrid orig<strong>in</strong>: U. carp<strong>in</strong>ifolia X plotii, and<br />

is the correct epithet for this hybrid, as U. X vim<strong>in</strong>alis. However the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

clone may still be known as <strong>Ulmus</strong> ’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis’.<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Argentea’ (Hillier, W<strong>in</strong>chester, England, Cat. 2P, p.<br />

100. 1938, as<br />

U. vim<strong>in</strong>alis argentea). Described as hav<strong>in</strong>g leaves variegated with silver.<br />

U. X vim<strong>in</strong>alis (that is U. var. procera vim<strong>in</strong>alis sensu Rehder).<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Aurea’ (Henry <strong>in</strong> Elwes &#x26; Henry, Trees Gr. Brit. Irel. 7: 1907. 1913,<br />

as U. campestris var. vim<strong>in</strong>alis aurea ) = U. X vim<strong>in</strong>alis ‘AUREA’.<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Gracilis’ (Dieck, Zoschen, Germany, Haupt-Cat. 1885, p. 82, as U.<br />

scabra vim<strong>in</strong>alis gracilis Hort., without description) = ’VIMINALIS’.<br />

’VIMINALIS MARGINATA’ ( Kirchner <strong>in</strong> Petzold &#x26; Kirchner, Arb. Muscav. 556. 1864,<br />

as U. campestris var. vim<strong>in</strong>alis marg<strong>in</strong>ata Hort.). Said to be a form <strong>of</strong> ‘Vim<strong>in</strong>alis’<br />

with the leaves variegated with creamy white near the marg<strong>in</strong>.<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Marmorata’ ( Schelle <strong>in</strong> Beissner et al., Handb. Laubh.-Benenn. 85.<br />

1903, as U. montana vim<strong>in</strong>alis marmorata Hort., without description) = ’PUL-<br />

VERULENTA’.<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Pendula’ (Masters <strong>in</strong> Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc. 13: 90. 1891,<br />

pendula, without description) = ’VIMINALIS’.<br />

78 ]<br />

as U. vim<strong>in</strong>alis<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Pulverulenta’ (Hartwig, Ill. Geholzb. ed. 2. 394. 1892, as L’. scabra<br />

var. vim<strong>in</strong>alis pulverulenta Hort. ) . Described as the pulverulent ‘Vim<strong>in</strong>alis’. _<br />

’PULVERULENTA’.<br />

’VIMINALIS STRICTA’ (Boulger <strong>in</strong> Gard. Chron. II. 12: 298. 1879, as U. campestris<br />

vim<strong>in</strong>alis stricta Loudon, without description).<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Superba’ ( Schelle <strong>in</strong> Beissner et al., Handb. Laubh.-Benenn. 85. 1903,<br />

as U. campestris vim<strong>in</strong>alis superba Hort., name <strong>in</strong> synonymy, without descrip-<br />

= tion) ’VIMINALIS MARGINATA’.<br />

’Vim<strong>in</strong>alis Variegata’ (Lee ex Jour. Roy. Hort. Soc. 18: 90. 1895,<br />

variegata, without description) = ’VIMINALIS MARGINATA’.<br />

as U. vim<strong>in</strong>alis<br />

’VIRENS’ (Masters, Hort. Duroverni 66. 1831, as U. virens, without description;<br />

Loudon, Arb. Frut. Brit. 3: 1376. 1838, as U. campestris var. virens). The<br />

Kidbrook Elm. Described as be<strong>in</strong>g almost evergreen <strong>in</strong> a mild w<strong>in</strong>ter; the bark<br />

is red and the tree <strong>of</strong> a spread<strong>in</strong>g habit. U. X hollandica.<br />

‘VIRGATA’ (Pep<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Revue Hort. 1865: 347. 1865, as U. campestris virgata and<br />

U. virgata). Described as hav<strong>in</strong>g slender, erect branches giv<strong>in</strong>g the tree a<br />

fastigiate shape. Planted before 1789 near Nangis, Se<strong>in</strong>e-et-Mame. U. carp<strong>in</strong>ifolia.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!