Registration of Cultivar Names in Ulmus - Arnoldia - Harvard ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

campestris var. myrti f olia Hort., without description; Rehder in Jour. Arnold Arb. 20: 87. 1939; Kriissmann, Handb. Laubgeh. 2: 540. 1962, as a cv.). Leaves ovate or rhombic-ovate to oblong-ovate, 2-3 (-5 ) cm. long, with nearly simple teeth, loosely pilose on both sides; fruit obovate, 12-15 mm. long. The specimen under this name in Herb. Nicholson at Kew has been identified by Dr. Melville as having small-leaved, juvenile-type foliage and probably being U. carpinifolia X or plotii U. X hollandica. ’Myrtifolia Purpurea’ (Louis de Smet, Ghent, Belgium, Cat. 10, p. 59. 1877, as U. myrtifolia purpurea) = ‘PURPURASCENS’. ’NANA’ (Loddiges, Hackney, London, Cat. 1836 [not seen] ; Loudon, Arb. Frut. Brit. 3: 1378, & 4: 2586. 1838, as U. campestris var. nana Hort.; Krussmann, Handb. Laubgeh. 2: 536. 1962, as a cv.). The Bush Elm. Described as a very distinct variety not growing above 2 feet in 10-12 years. Species uncertain, the Kew bush is said by Dr. Melville to be U. carpinifolia X glabra or possibly U. X hollandica. ’NEMORALIS’ (Schelle in Beissner et al., Handb. Laubh.-Benenn. 84. 1903, as U. campestris f. nemoralis Hort., without description ) . Possibly U. carpinifolia. ’NIGRA’ (Loddiges ex Loudon, Arb. Frut. Brit. 3: 1398. 1838, as U. montana var. nigra). The Black Irish Elm. Said to have particularly deep green leaves. U. glabra. ’NIGRESCENS’ (Pynaert in Tijdschr. Boomteelt. [Bull. Arb. Flor. Cult. Potag.] 1879: 57. 1879, as U. campestris betulaefolia nigrescens ) . Described as having leaves like a birch and of a darker more persistent color than ’Purpurea’. Probably U. carpinifolia but said to have been raised from seed of ’Purpurea’. ’Nigrescens’ (Schelle in Beissner et al., Handb. Laubh.-Benenn. 87. 1903, as U. americana f. nigrescens Dieck, name only) = ’NIGRICANS’. ‘NIGRICANS’ (Dieck, Zoschen, Germany, Haupt-Cat. 1885, p. 80). Selected from seedlings raised at the Zoschener Baumschule, distinguished by the deep darkgreen color of the leaves. U. americana. ’Nigricans’ (Bailey & Bailey, Hortus 625. 1930, as U. nigricans, name in synonymy) = ‘NIGRESCENS’. ’OBLONGATA’ (Koch, Dendr. 2 (1) : 415. 1872, as U. oblongata Hort.). Described as having a broad oblong leaf without noticeable apical teeth. U. glabra. ’Ohioensis’ (Nicholson, Kew Hand-List Trees & Shrubs 2: 141. 1896, as U. ohioensis Hort., in synonymy, without description) = ’ExoNIENSIS’. ’Ontariensis’ (Koch, Dendr. 2 ( 1 ) : 416. 1872, as U. ontariensis, name in synonymy) = ’EXONIENSIS’. ’ORNATA’ ( Carriere, Revue Hort. 1858: 554. 1858, as U. communis ornata ) . Described from Toulouse and characterized as having leaves which are not [ 68 8
the kindness of Mlle. Y. de Ferre it is understood that two individual trees still exist in the original locality, still show resistance to insect attack, and are probably two of the plants referred to by Carriere. They prove to be U. laevis, of which plantings had been made at that locality in the 18th century, and not U. glabra most of the U. laevis. eaten by insects whilst those of the common type are. Through (U. communis) which had been planted to replace ’Oxfortii’ (Wesmael in Bull. Fed. Soc. Hort. Belg. 1862: 389. 1863, as U. campestris var. nuda subvar. fastigiata oxfortii Hort. Vilv. ) . Described as a py- ’SAR- ramidal tree with the leaves not lying against the branches. Possibly = NIENSIS’. ’Oxoniensis’ (Audibert, Tonelle, France, Cat. 2, p. 53. 1831-32, 69 9 as U. suberosa oxoniensis, without description; Wesmael in Bull. Fed. Soc. Hort. Belg. 1862: 389. 1863, as U. campestris var. nuda subvar. fastigiata oxoniensis Hort. Vilv.). Described as a pyramidal tree with the leaves perceptibly lying branches. Possibly an error for ’Exoniensis’. towards the ’Parasol’ (Koch, Dendr. 2 (1) : 417. 1872, name in synonymy ) _ ’HORIZONTALIS’. ’PENDENS’ (Rehder in Jour. Arnold Arb. 26: 473. 1945, as U. parvifolia f. pendens). Described as having long, loosely pendulous branches. Originated in California before 1930 from seed of the typical plant received from China. U. parvifolia. pendula (Aiton, Hort. Kew. 1: 320. 1789, as U. americana var. pendula). Has a vase-shaped habit but with branches pendulous at their ends. This habit is part of the natural variation of U. americana and would seem to warrant no higher botanical rank than forma. It is doubtful if the original clone cultivated in Britain in 1752 still exists. It was later confused with a pendulous variant of - U. _ glabra. ’PENDULA’ (Masters, Hort. Duroverni 66. 1831, as U. campestris pendula, without description; Krussmann, Handb. Laubgeh. 2: 537. 1962, as a cv.) = ‘SMITHII’. ’Pendula’ (Audibert, Tonelle, France, Cat. 2, p. 53. 1831-32, as U. suberosa pendula, without description) = ‘PROPENDENS’. ’Pendula’ (Loddiges, Hackney, London, Cat. 1836 [not seen]; Loudon, Arb. Frut. Brit. 3: 1398. 1838, as U. montana var. pendula; Kriissmann in Parey’s Blumengartn. ed. 2. 1: 519. 1958, as a cv.) = ‘HORIZONTALIS’. ’PENDULA’ (David in Revue Hort. II. 4: 101. 1845, as U. campestris pendula; Krussmann, Handb. Laubgeh. 2: 540. 1962, as a cv. ) . Described as having small leaves with equal teeth and pendulous branches. U. pumila. ’Pendula’ ( Kirchner in Petzold & Kirchner, Arb. Muscav. 565. 1864, not of Loudon 1838, as U. montana var. pendula) = ’CAMPERDOWNII’. ’PENDULA’ (C. de Vos, Handboek 20. 1887, as U. sativa pendula [not seen]); Boom, Ned. Dendr. 1: 158. 1959, as a cv.). Described as having slender
Page 1 and 2: ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULL
Page 3 and 4: which a cultivar should be assigned
Page 5 and 6: It is believed that it would be wro
Page 7 and 8: ‘Adiantifolia’ (Kirchner in Pet
Page 9 and 10: ’Asplenifolia’ (Rehder in Baile
Page 11 and 12: having "leaves somewhat resembling
Page 13 and 14: ’Cinerea’ (Kirchner in Petzold
Page 15 and 16: Dampieri Aurea’ (Wrede ex Jager &
Page 17 and 18: ‘ESCAILLARD’ (Andre Leroy Nurse
Page 19 and 20: ’Folia Aureo-variegata’ (Baudri
Page 21 and 22: 1960, as a registered trade mark,
Page 23 and 24: ’INCISA’ (Loudon, Arb. Frut. Br
Page 25 and 26: ’LOMBARTSII’ (Lombarts, Zundert
Page 27: ’Minneapolis Park Board’ (Sherm
Page 31 and 32: ’Praestans’ (Beterams in Mitt.
Page 33 and 34: and described as growing a little m
Page 35 and 36: ’STAR’ ( Plumfield Nurseries, F
Page 37 and 38: cultivated in France in 1772. Varie
Page 39 and 40: ’Virginalis’ (Lavallee, Arb. Se

Registration of Cultivar Names in Ulmus - Arnoldia - Harvard ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?