10.07.2015 Views

BBVA in 2012

BBVA in 2012

BBVA in 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Exposure to the real-estate sector <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong><strong>BBVA</strong>’s exposure to the real-estate sector <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> is limited, and amounts to €27,417m (out of which56% are developer loans and 44% build<strong>in</strong>gs). The year-on-year <strong>in</strong>crease of €5,501m is basicallythe result of the <strong>in</strong>corporation of Unnim, which as of 31-Dec-<strong>2012</strong> had an exposure to this sectorof €5,791m, or 21% of <strong>BBVA</strong> Group’s total exposure. It should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out that the Unnim deal<strong>in</strong>cludes an asset protection scheme (APS) by which the Deposit Guarantee Fund (DGF) will takeon 80% of any losses of a predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed asset portfolio for a period of 10 years, after mak<strong>in</strong>g useof exist<strong>in</strong>g provisions. The risk of <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g Unnim portfolios <strong>in</strong>to <strong>BBVA</strong> Group is thereforeextremely limited, not only due to their high coverage ratio, but also because of the existence ofthe APS.By status of the assets, 76% are classified as problematic (32.5% NPA, 10.0% substandard and 57.5%foreclosed assets) and 24% are perform<strong>in</strong>g risk.The breakdown of the developer loans by type of assets is: 53.2% f<strong>in</strong>ished hous<strong>in</strong>g, 11.2%hous<strong>in</strong>g under development, 26.3% land and 9.4% other assets, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g those with personalguarantee.The most relevant aspect <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong> is the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> funds used to cover the additionalimpairment <strong>in</strong> the value of assets associated with the real-estate <strong>in</strong>dustry ow<strong>in</strong>g to the country’sworsen<strong>in</strong>g macroeconomic situation. As a result, additional funds have been set aside, result<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease over the year of coverage for non-perform<strong>in</strong>g and substandard assets, togetherwith assets from foreclosures and purchases, to 43%. Follow<strong>in</strong>g the effort made <strong>in</strong> provisions, atthe close of <strong>2012</strong> the Group has met the requirements imposed by Royal Decree-Laws 02/<strong>2012</strong>and 18/<strong>2012</strong>.Coverage of real-estate exposure <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>(Million of euros as of 31-12-12)Risk amount Provision % Coverage over riskNPL + Substandard 8,906 3,854 43NPL 6,814 3,123 46Substandard 2,092 731 35Foreclosed real-estate and other assets 12,059 6,186 51From real-estate developers 8,894 4,893 55From Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs 2,512 1,020 41Other 653 273 42Subtotal 20,965 10,040 48Perform<strong>in</strong>g 6,452 1,788 28With collateral 5,839F<strong>in</strong>ished properties 3,573Construction <strong>in</strong> progress 854Land 1,412Without collateral and other 613Real-estate exposure 27,417 11,828 43104 Risk management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!