10.07.2015 Views

BBVA in 2012

BBVA in 2012

BBVA in 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The portfolio model and concentration and diversification effectsCredit risk for the global portfolio of the <strong>BBVA</strong> Group is measured through a portfolio model wherethe effects of concentration and diversification are considered. Its purpose is to study the entireloan book as a whole, by analyz<strong>in</strong>g and captur<strong>in</strong>g the effect of <strong>in</strong>terrelations between the variousportfolios.In addition to enabl<strong>in</strong>g a more comprehensive calculation of capital needs, this model is a key toolfor credit risk management, as it establishes loan limits based on the contribution of each unit tototal risk <strong>in</strong> a global, diversified sett<strong>in</strong>g.The portfolio model considers that risk comes from various sources (it is a multi-factor model). Thisfeature implies that economic capital is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly sensitive to geographic diversification, a crucialaspect <strong>in</strong> a global entity like <strong>BBVA</strong>. These effects have become more apparent aga<strong>in</strong>st the currentbackdrop <strong>in</strong> which, despite the stress undergone by the markets and the different rates of recovery<strong>in</strong> the countries where the Group operates, they have contributed to lessen<strong>in</strong>g the impact of thissituation on <strong>BBVA</strong>.The tool is also sensitive to the concentration that may exist <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> credit exposures, such asthe Institution’s large customers. Apart from geography, <strong>in</strong>dustry factors are now key to bus<strong>in</strong>essconcentration analyses.Credit risk <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong>The most significant aspects <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g credit risk are summarized below:• The Group’s NPA ratio rose due to the macroeconomic situation previously mentioned, togetherwith the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> lend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> and <strong>in</strong> the Bank’s CIB portfolios, ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> developedcountries.• There was also a new <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> provisions <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> to cover the gradual impairment ofreal-estate portfolios and assets with<strong>in</strong> the scope of the Royal Legislative Decrees 02/<strong>2012</strong> and18/<strong>2012</strong>, <strong>in</strong> order to comply with the provisions of these two laws.• In the rest of the geographical areas, asset quality was stable or improved.As a result, the Group ended <strong>2012</strong> with its ma<strong>in</strong> risk <strong>in</strong>dicators as expected and compar<strong>in</strong>gpositively with those of most of its peers. As of 31-Dec-<strong>2012</strong>, the NPA ratio stood at 5.1%, thecoverage ratio at 72% and the cumulative risk premium at 2.16%.<strong>BBVA</strong>’s maximum exposure to credit risk stood at €648,039m at the close of December <strong>2012</strong>,with a year-on-year <strong>in</strong>crease of 3.7%. Customer credit risks (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>gent liabilities),which account for 62.8% of total credit risk, <strong>in</strong>creased by 1.6% over the same time period.This <strong>in</strong>crease was due ma<strong>in</strong>ly to two factors: the <strong>in</strong>corporation of Unnim and the growth <strong>in</strong>lend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g countries. Potential exposure to credit risk <strong>in</strong> market activities (23.9%overall), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g potential exposure to derivatives (once nett<strong>in</strong>g and collateral agreementsare considered), also rose by 14.6%, particularly <strong>in</strong> fixed-<strong>in</strong>come, while undrawn facilities (13.3%overall) fell by 3.1%.Credit risk101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!