10.07.2015 Views

New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ...

New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ...

New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceed<strong>in</strong>g of the 4 rd International Symposium“NEW RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY” USAMV Bucharest, Romania, 2011LocalityNTG YM DON ZEA Impurities Moldy(ufc/g) (ufc/g) (g/kg) (g/kg) (%) gra<strong>in</strong>s (%)Rosiori <strong>de</strong> Ve<strong>de</strong> 1.10·10 5 3.60·10 3 n.d.* n.d.* 4.87 0.05Vi<strong>de</strong>le 7.00·10 5 3.00·10 3 n.d.* n.d.* 7.7 0* not <strong>de</strong>tectedIn Figure 1 is presented the evolution of DON content <strong>in</strong> all the wheat samples. Asit can be noticed, the highest value for DON is registered <strong>in</strong> Dâmboviţa (686.51 g/kg),followed by Dolj (554.39 g/kg) and Călăraşi (397.8 g/kg).In all wheat samples studied, the mycotox<strong>in</strong> content was below the maximumlevels allowed for unprocessed cereals established by CE no. 1881/2006 regulation; exceptfor Teleorman county where samples from Bogdana and Mosteni locality exceed the limitfor ZEA content (100 g/kg), namely 112.657 g/kg, respectively 191.052 g/kg (Fig.2).800700600DON, µg/kg5004003002001000Dolj Călăraşi Olt Dâmboviţa Buzău Brăila Mehed<strong>in</strong>ţi TeleormanFig.1. Evolution of DON content <strong>in</strong> wheat samples from the counties analyzed.There were samples <strong>in</strong> which mycotox<strong>in</strong> content was not <strong>de</strong>tected: 92.7% ofsamples analyzed for ZEA, respectively 34.8% for DON content, the values be<strong>in</strong>g belowthe limit of <strong>de</strong>tection of the method used for analysis. So, DON presence is higher thanZEA <strong>in</strong> wheat samples studied.In 5 counties, namely, Dolj, Olt, Dâmboviţa, Buzău and Mehed<strong>in</strong>ţi, ZEA contentwas not <strong>de</strong>tected <strong>in</strong> all the wheat samples studied. The only values <strong>de</strong>tected for ZEAcontent <strong>in</strong> some localities from Călăraşi, Brăila and Teleorman are presented <strong>in</strong> Fig.2.Also, <strong>in</strong> all the samples from Călăraşi, Olt and Dâmboviţa, DON content was<strong>de</strong>tected.In Fig.3 is shown a comparison between the highest values for DON found <strong>in</strong> awheat sample from each of the county analyzed and the correspond<strong>in</strong>g value for ZEA forthe same sample.194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!