New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ...
New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ... New Researches in Biotechnology - Facultatea de Biotehnologii ...
190Proceeding of the 4 rd International Symposium“NEW RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY” USAMV Bucharest, Romania, 2011RESEARCH ON MYCOTOXIN CONTENT OF TRITICUM AESTIVUM INROMANIAN SOUTH CROPSAMALIA MITELUŢ 1 , ALINA CULEŢU 1,2 , IRINA SMEU 2 , MONA POPA 11 University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Biotechnology, Bd. Mărăsti, no.59,Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: amaliamitelut@yahoo.com2 National Institute of Research & Development for Food Bioresources – IBA Bucharest, Str. Dinu Vintilă, no.1-6,Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: alinaculetu@yahoo.comAbstract. In this study, there have been analyzed 69 wheat samples (Triticum aestivum, Dropiavariety) from 8 different regions situated in southern Romania; samples were provided in 2010 rightafter harvesting.For these samples were determined microbiological analysis (total number of germ, yeastsand molds), mycotoxin content (deoxynivalenol – DON, zearalenone – ZEA) and also physicalchemicaltests (percentage of impurities and foreign bodies, number of moldy grains).Following the interpretation of results it was found that in all wheat samples studied, the mycotoxincontent was below the maximum levels allowed for unprocessed cereals established by CE no.1881/2006 regulation, except for Teleorman county were 2 samples exceed the limit for ZEA content.There were samples in which mycotoxin content was not detected: 92.7% of samplesanalyzed for ZEA, respectively 34.8% for DON content, the values being below the limit of detectionof the method used for analysis.This paper is part of a research project funding by National Research Program PN II(no.52-132/2008).Keywords: Triticum aestivum, Dropia variety, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone1. INTRODUCTIONMycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by fungi, with different andcomplex chemical structures and common characteristics, such as: resistance to thermaldegradation, persistence during processing of products. Once formed mycotoxin will reachthe final consumer products.Wheat can be contaminated with mycotoxins produced by a variety of fungi, inparticular by Fusarium species [1]. Growth of these fungi and formation of mycotoxins canoccur, depending on some conditions, such as: crop growth, harvest, transport, storage(fungi multiply when relative humidity is 80 – 85%, and temperature is high, above 26 0 C)and processing [2].The most important Fusarium mycotoxins that can frequently occur at biologicallysignificant concentrations in cereals are: fumonisins, zearalenone (ZEA) andtrichothecenes: deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol and T-2 toxin. Mycotoxins DON andZEA are produced by Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium culmorum and Fusariumcrookwellense.DON (also called vomitoxin) is the most important trichothecenes because of its highincidence in cereals, including maize, wheat, barley, oats, but it is not one of the mostacutely toxic of this group of mycotoxins [3].
Proceeding of the 4 rd International Symposium“NEW RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY” USAMV Bucharest, Romania, 2011ZEA may be present in cereal crops in cooler and moist regions worldwide.Mycotoxins not only cause serious damages in yields and quality of grains, butalso can induce a variety of adverse health effects in humans and animals, depending oncontamination levels of the products. Due to the increased concern about protection of theconsumer, mycotoxins are monitored in the European Union with official regulations [4].Thus, mycotoxins are strictly regulated in the Commission Regulation EC no. 1881/2006[5]; for instance, maximum level for DON in unprocessed wheat is set to 1250 g/kg,respectively, 100 g/kg for ZEA.In this work, a monitoring of wheat samples (Dropia variety) from the point ofview of mycotoxin content has been performed in some regions from southern Romania.2. MATERIALS AND METHODSSamples preparationThe selected samples for analysis were wheat Triticum aestivum, grown insouthern Romania, collected from local producers in 2010. There have been analyzed 69wheat samples coming from 8 different geographical regions: Dolj (13 samples), Călăraşi(12 samples), Olt (8 samples), Dâmboviţa (4 samples), Buzău (9 samples), Brăila (4samples), Mehedinţi (3 samples) and Teleorman (16 samples). All the samples belonged toDropia variety, which is preponderant in south region for bakery wheat. In this study, thesamples were analyzed right after harvesting.Samples preparation consists in grinding of almost 500 g wheat in order to obtaina homogeneous powder.Extraction procedure for ZEA mycotoxin: 25 mL mixture methanol / water (70/30)is added to 5 g ground sample, stirred (at 180 rpm, 10 minutes, room temperature),followed by extract filtration on Whatman no.1 paper. The same procedure for DONextraction, except that only water is used as solvent.Methods used for analysisDetection and quantification of mycotoxin content was determined using ELISAtype immuno-enzymatic method (Ridascreen Zearalenon kit for ZEA, respectively,Ridascreen Deoxynivalenol kit for DON – producer R–Biopharm, Germany). Opticaldensity are read (at 450 nm) with Sunrise spectrophotometer (Tecan, Austria), equippedwith Rida ® SOFT Win program (R–Biopharm, Germany). Two repetitive samples havebeen used and the average media of these samples has been employed in data analysis.Procedure for microbiological analysis is based on counting colonies ofmicroorganisms obtained on solid media, by incubation. Thus, microbiological indicators,such as total number of germ on Plate Count Agar and number of yeasts and molds onGlucose – Chloramphenicol Agar were determined.The determination of impurities was carried out according to SR ISO 7970:2001 –Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Specifications – which refers to the average quality of wheat[6].191
- Page 139 and 140: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 141 and 142: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 143 and 144: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 145 and 146: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 147 and 148: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 149 and 150: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 151 and 152: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 153 and 154: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 155 and 156: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 157 and 158: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 159 and 160: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 161 and 162: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 163 and 164: Day 7Day 10Proceeding of the 4 rd I
- Page 165 and 166: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 167 and 168: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 169 and 170: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 171 and 172: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 173 and 174: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 175 and 176: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 177 and 178: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 179 and 180: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 181 and 182: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 183 and 184: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 185 and 186: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 187 and 188: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 189: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 193 and 194: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 195 and 196: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 197 and 198: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 199 and 200: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 201 and 202: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 203 and 204: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 205 and 206: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 207 and 208: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 209 and 210: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 211 and 212: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 213 and 214: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 215 and 216: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 217 and 218: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 219 and 220: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 221 and 222: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 223 and 224: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 225 and 226: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 227 and 228: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 229 and 230: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 231 and 232: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 233 and 234: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
- Page 235 and 236: Proceeding of the 4 rd Internationa
190Proceed<strong>in</strong>g of the 4 rd International Symposium“NEW RESEARCH IN BIOTECHNOLOGY” USAMV Bucharest, Romania, 2011RESEARCH ON MYCOTOXIN CONTENT OF TRITICUM AESTIVUM INROMANIAN SOUTH CROPSAMALIA MITELUŢ 1 , ALINA CULEŢU 1,2 , IRINA SMEU 2 , MONA POPA 11 University of Agronomic Sciences and Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Medic<strong>in</strong>e, Faculty of <strong>Biotechnology</strong>, Bd. Mărăsti, no.59,Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: amaliamitelut@yahoo.com2 National Institute of Research & Development for Food Bioresources – IBA Bucharest, Str. D<strong>in</strong>u V<strong>in</strong>tilă, no.1-6,Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: al<strong>in</strong>aculetu@yahoo.comAbstract. In this study, there have been analyzed 69 wheat samples (Triticum aestivum, Dropiavariety) from 8 different regions situated <strong>in</strong> southern Romania; samples were provi<strong>de</strong>d <strong>in</strong> 2010 rightafter harvest<strong>in</strong>g.For these samples were <strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed microbiological analysis (total number of germ, yeastsand molds), mycotox<strong>in</strong> content (<strong>de</strong>oxynivalenol – DON, zearalenone – ZEA) and also physicalchemicaltests (percentage of impurities and foreign bodies, number of moldy gra<strong>in</strong>s).Follow<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of results it was found that <strong>in</strong> all wheat samples studied, the mycotox<strong>in</strong>content was below the maximum levels allowed for unprocessed cereals established by CE no.1881/2006 regulation, except for Teleorman county were 2 samples exceed the limit for ZEA content.There were samples <strong>in</strong> which mycotox<strong>in</strong> content was not <strong>de</strong>tected: 92.7% of samplesanalyzed for ZEA, respectively 34.8% for DON content, the values be<strong>in</strong>g below the limit of <strong>de</strong>tectionof the method used for analysis.This paper is part of a research project fund<strong>in</strong>g by National Research Program PN II(no.52-132/2008).Keywords: Triticum aestivum, Dropia variety, <strong>de</strong>oxynivalenol, zearalenone1. INTRODUCTIONMycotox<strong>in</strong>s are secondary metabolites produced by fungi, with different andcomplex chemical structures and common characteristics, such as: resistance to thermal<strong>de</strong>gradation, persistence dur<strong>in</strong>g process<strong>in</strong>g of products. Once formed mycotox<strong>in</strong> will reachthe f<strong>in</strong>al consumer products.Wheat can be contam<strong>in</strong>ated with mycotox<strong>in</strong>s produced by a variety of fungi, <strong>in</strong>particular by Fusarium species [1]. Growth of these fungi and formation of mycotox<strong>in</strong>s canoccur, <strong>de</strong>pend<strong>in</strong>g on some conditions, such as: crop growth, harvest, transport, storage(fungi multiply when relative humidity is 80 – 85%, and temperature is high, above 26 0 C)and process<strong>in</strong>g [2].The most important Fusarium mycotox<strong>in</strong>s that can frequently occur at biologicallysignificant concentrations <strong>in</strong> cereals are: fumonis<strong>in</strong>s, zearalenone (ZEA) andtrichothecenes: <strong>de</strong>oxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol and T-2 tox<strong>in</strong>. Mycotox<strong>in</strong>s DON andZEA are produced by Fusarium gram<strong>in</strong>earum, Fusarium culmorum and Fusariumcrookwellense.DON (also called vomitox<strong>in</strong>) is the most important trichothecenes because of its high<strong>in</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>nce <strong>in</strong> cereals, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g maize, wheat, barley, oats, but it is not one of the mostacutely toxic of this group of mycotox<strong>in</strong>s [3].