2007 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 16MB) - Bolsa Chica Lowlands ...

2007 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 16MB) - Bolsa Chica Lowlands ... 2007 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 16MB) - Bolsa Chica Lowlands ...

bolsachicarestoration.org
from bolsachicarestoration.org More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Monitoring2007 Annual ReportII. PHYSICAL MONITORING PROGRAMThe physical monitoring program focuses on large-scale morphological changes of the system andtidal response to these changes. Principally this monitoring includes evaluation of inlet shoaling,coastal beach response to inlet conditions and sand loss to the flood bar, and tidal reaction to shoaldevelopment. The physical monitoring program is intended to monitor changes in relation toestablished management triggers, and to adaptively evaluate and recommend adjustment of triggerswhere appropriate to ensure health of the system and protection of coastal beach resources.2.1. INLET FLOOD SHOALIntroductionA newly constructed inlet to a tidally influenced system will typically interrupt longshore sedimenttransport and divert sediment both offshore (creating an ebb bar) and towards the tidal basin (creating aflood shoal). As the ebb bar forms, it affects the wave and current regime. This, in turn, causes theshoreline planform to evolve toward a new dynamic equilibrium condition. Similarly, the flood andebb tidal currents moving through the inlet will build and shape a flood shoal in the interior of the tidebasin. The configurations and sizes of the bars depend on the tidal prism of the basin, cross-sectionalarea of the tidal inlet, length of the jetties, tidal range, and longshore sediment transport rate. Whilecomplete equilibrium is rarely achieved, rates of change within the ebb bar and flood shoal typicallydiminish as the conditions around a new inlet stabilize. To limit early adverse impacts of ebb bardevelopment on the shoreline processes, approximately 929,326 m 3 (1,214,579 y 3 ) of sand was placedas pre-fill to form the ebb bar at Bolsa Chica. This fill was placed to avoid the potential of the full ebbbar developing from beach sand longshore drift and thus robbing the littoral cell of mobile sandsupply.As beach sand migrates longshore on the coast, it is made available for capture by flood tides intoBolsa Chica. Sand is moved into the system where it settles into a flood shoal. A portion of this sandis moved back to the beach with the ebbing tide while a portion of the sand remains trapped in theshoal deposits. As the flood shoal matures, it will begin to restrict ebbing tidal flow through the inlet.Tidal flow restriction will diminish or mute the full tidal range in the system relative to the tidal rangethat would exist without the flood shoal. Therefore, a monitoring, maintenance, and maintenancedredging plan was incorporated into the Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Project and is beingimplemented as an essential component to the long-term health and viability of the system.The oversized inlet of Bolsa Chica was sized to accommodate the tidal prism of the FTB, the threeMTBs, and the FFTB. From the time of opening and throughout 2007, only the FTB supplied tidalprism through the inlet. As a result, tidal velocities through the inlet are too low to keep the channelbetween the jetties fully open and sedimentation is expected and has been observed in the inletchannel. As additional tidal prism is added to the system with the opening of the MTBs, the inletmouth will increase in cross-sectional area as it responds to the higher tidal velocity required to feedthe system during tidal exchanges.The preliminary engineering studies (M&N 1999) done for the project predicted a flood shoal volumeof 126,200 m 3 (165,000 y 3 ) at the end of the first year and a shoaling rate of 102,500 m 3 /year (134,000y 3 /year) for the second year after the inlet was to be connected to the ocean, for a total ofapproximately 230,000 m 3 (300,000 y 3 ) over the first two years. The predicted flood shoal location isMerkel & Associates, Inc. 59

Bolsa Chica Lowlands Restoration Monitoring2007 Annual Reportillustrated in Figure 2-1. Investigations were completed to assess the true rate of shoal accretion anddistribution pattern of flood shoal development.Full TidalBasin (Phase I)Modeled Shoal AreaTidal InletScale 1’’= 1,800’Figure 2-1. Predicted Flood Shoal Area (cited from M&N 1999).MethodologyThe rate and distribution of sand accretion in the FTB inlet was assessed during three surveys in thefirst year: January 19 and June 27, 2007 and January 10, 2008. The results of the 2008 survey areincluded in the present report as they document the bathymetric changes that occurred in the latter halfof 2007. The survey area was presented in Figure 1-1.The surveys were conducted from a small survey vessel with sub-meter accurate differential globalpositioning system (dGPS) and a survey-grade SyQuest Hydrobox ® fathometer. The first surveyextended from the PCH bridge into the FTB, within the maintenance basin and beyond any evidence offlood shoaling. The survey area was expanded in the latter surveys after field observations indicatedthe shoaling extended to the north of the maintenance basin. The expanded survey area extended fromthe PCH bridge north to the Freeman Creek outlet to the FTB. All future surveys will include thislarger area.During the July 2007 and January 2008 surveys, large areas of the shoals were not accessible by boatdue to their high elevation. To determine the elevation of these areas, additional survey work wasconducted using a total station for land-based survey.Merkel & Associates, Inc. 60

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong> Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><strong>2007</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong>II. PHYSICAL MONITORING PROGRAMThe physical monitoring program focuses on large-scale morphological changes of the system andtidal response to these changes. Principally this monitoring includes evaluation of inlet shoaling,coastal beach response to inlet conditions and sand loss to the flood bar, and tidal reaction to shoaldevelopment. The physical monitoring program is intended to monitor changes in relation toestablished management triggers, and to adaptively evaluate and recommend adjustment of triggerswhere appropriate to ensure health of the system and protection of coastal beach resources.2.1. INLET FLOOD SHOALIntroductionA newly constructed inlet to a tidally influenced system will typically interrupt longshore sedimenttransport and divert sediment both offshore (creating an ebb bar) and towards the tidal basin (creating aflood shoal). As the ebb bar forms, it affects the wave and current regime. This, in turn, causes theshoreline planform to evolve toward a new dynamic equilibrium condition. Similarly, the flood andebb tidal currents moving through the inlet will build and shape a flood shoal in the interior of the tidebasin. The configurations and sizes of the bars depend on the tidal prism of the basin, cross-sectionalarea of the tidal inlet, length of the jetties, tidal range, and longshore sediment transport rate. Whilecomplete equilibrium is rarely achieved, rates of change within the ebb bar and flood shoal typicallydiminish as the conditions around a new inlet stabilize. To limit early adverse impacts of ebb bardevelopment on the shoreline processes, approximately 929,326 m 3 (1,214,579 y 3 ) of sand was placedas pre-fill to form the ebb bar at <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong>. This fill was placed to avoid the potential of the full ebbbar developing from beach sand longshore drift and thus robbing the littoral cell of mobile sandsupply.As beach sand migrates longshore on the coast, it is made available for capture by flood tides into<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong>. Sand is moved into the system where it settles into a flood shoal. A portion of this sandis moved back to the beach with the ebbing tide while a portion of the sand remains trapped in theshoal deposits. As the flood shoal matures, it will begin to restrict ebbing tidal flow through the inlet.Tidal flow restriction will diminish or mute the full tidal range in the system relative to the tidal rangethat would exist without the flood shoal. Therefore, a monitoring, maintenance, and maintenancedredging plan was incorporated into the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> <strong>Lowlands</strong> Restoration Project and is beingimplemented as an essential component to the long-term health and viability of the system.The oversized inlet of <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> was sized to accommodate the tidal prism of the FTB, the threeMTBs, and the FFTB. From the time of opening and throughout <strong>2007</strong>, only the FTB supplied tidalprism through the inlet. As a result, tidal velocities through the inlet are too low to keep the channelbetween the jetties fully open and sedimentation is expected and has been observed in the inletchannel. As additional tidal prism is added to the system with the opening of the MTBs, the inletmouth will increase in cross-sectional area as it responds to the higher tidal velocity required to feedthe system during tidal exchanges.The preliminary engineering studies (M&N 1999) done for the project predicted a flood shoal volumeof 126,200 m 3 (165,000 y 3 ) at the end of the first year and a shoaling rate of 102,500 m 3 /year (134,000y 3 /year) for the second year after the inlet was to be connected to the ocean, for a total ofapproximately 230,000 m 3 (300,000 y 3 ) over the first two years. The predicted flood shoal location isMerkel & Associates, Inc. 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!