10.07.2015 Views

EVALUATING THE TOXICITY OF REACTIVE DYES AND DYED ...

EVALUATING THE TOXICITY OF REACTIVE DYES AND DYED ...

EVALUATING THE TOXICITY OF REACTIVE DYES AND DYED ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AUTEX Research Journal, Vol. 7, No3, September 2007 © AUTEXthe yellow dye, the C of V values for the non- toxic samples were between 2-14%, and for the toxicsamples were between 17-21%. For fabric extracts, the C of V values were between 9-13%.DiscussionThis study has shown that the reactive dyes were toxic in concentrations which were lower than thoseused in commercial dyeing processes. Reactive dyes react with cellulose under alkaline conditions[24]. The reactive dyes have studied pH values between 4,5-6,5; however, the dyes are very reactivein human keratinocyte cells. The textile dyes when used commercially contain many other chemicalsin addition to the dye molecules. There are different salts, including calcium stearate, CMC and otherchemicals. This means that the discussion of the results of this work relates to the toxicity of a mixtureof chemicals and not just to the pure molecules: the effect of the pure dye alone cannot be evaluatedand it is also not possible to know the concentration of the dye itself in the powder used as thecommercial dyestuff. However, since these dyes are part of a mixture when they are used in industry,it is more useful to know the toxicity of this mixture than that of the pure dye when assessing thesafety of commercial dye formulations.The results show that the dyes are toxic, but the dyed fabrics are not. This can be explained by thefact that the pure reactive dye in powder form is very active, but after the dyeing process many of thereactive sites on the dye molecules have taken part in the formation of covalent bonds with fibremolecules [8]. These bonds are very stable and this can explain why the dyed fabric material is nottoxic.The red dye produced adverse effects under the lowest concentration of the dye: the IC20 value was28µg/ml: the IC50 value (155µg/ml) was the lowest compared to the values for the other dyes. Theblue dye and the yellow dye had IC20 values between 78-112µg/ml: IC50 values were between 237-278µg/ml, showing clear toxicity. When 80% of the cells are dead IC20 values indicate low toxicity andthe results show that the red dye is very toxic even at low concentrations.Although the dyes were toxic, extracts from the dyed fabrics were not toxic. Although the extractscontained dye (they were coloured), the results showed that they were not toxic and it can beassumed that the dye in solution had been hydrolyzed. The protein contents of all fabric samples wereover 80% compared to the non-exposed cells. For some samples the C of V values showed theprotein content to be under 80%. However, the mean percentage values for the protein contents of thefabric extracts showed clearly that these were non-toxic.This study therefore supports earlier studies which have shown pure reactive dyes to have adverseeffects. Allergic reactions are commonly known to cause allergic diseases for workers in industry [5,7].Park et al. detected workers in the textile industry as having changes in the amounts ofimmunoglobulins in their blood [20]. Keneklis noticed some textile dyes are mutagenic [12]. HaCaTcells were used by Wollin et al. [28] to show that several azo are genotoxic. Birhanli et al haveestablished that some reactive dyes are teratogenic [2].The Chemical Safety Data Sheets [3] show the LD50 value for the yellow dye to be 5000mg/kg, higherthan the 2000mg/kg values for the red and blue dyes. According to toxicity tests using activatedsludge, the toxicity of the blue dye measured as EC50 (the molar concentration of an agonist whichproduces 50% of the maximum possible response for that agonist) was higher than 100mg/l. Using theOECD 209 method, 1984, the red and yellow dyes had IC50 values higher than 1000mg/l. Using theOECD 203 method (an acute fish toxicity test using Salmo gairneri and Oncorhynchus mykiss) thevalues of LC50 (the concentration of a chemical which kills 50% of a sample population) for the redand yellow dyes were found to be higher than 100mg/l.[3]. In this study, the IC50 values for all threedyes showed the limit value of toxicity to be over 100µg/ml as in the tests using activated sludge andfish. The cytotoxicity test using HaCaT cells is very sensitive and the IC20 values indicated toxicity inconcentrations lower than 100mg/l.Kopponen et al [13] have used hepa-1 cells to test the toxicity of textile dyes and dyed fabrics. Theymeasured IC50 values but not IC20 values. The dyes that they used were not the same as the onesused in this study, but the results showed similar levels of dye concentration which resulted in toxicity.Klemola et al have used the spermatozoa motility test for studying the same textile dyes as in thiswork (paper submitted to AUTEX Research Journal). In this test the IC50 values were calculated afterhttp://www.autexrj.org/No3-2007/0231.pdf 221

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!