Scoping Advice for the Dutch IWRM Support Programme Rwanda

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX 8Map with proposed catchmentsThe maps below illustrate catchment Levels 1 and 2, as proposed by the Master Plan developmentteam in their latest progress report 1 :CatchmentsLevel 1CatchmentsLevel 21 Consultancy services for development of Rwanda national water resources master plan (Progress report -1), SHER Ingénieurs-Conseils s.a., October 2012Appendix 8 page -1-
APPENDIX 910 steps for SEAInternational best practice suggests the following sequence of steps which help guide each SEA,allowing for enough room to tailor its design to the specific programme, plan or policy, as well ascontext and circumstances.The NCEA uses these steps as guidance, a checklist, and not as a fixed framework for SEA.Depending on the specific characteristics of an SEA, some steps may be skipped, others may berepeated, or they may be followed in a different order or at the same time.Particularly in cases where questions remain regarding the planning process, such as in the SEAsfor the EKN’s IWRM support programme (see section 5.1) and the proposed SEAs for catchmentplans (5.3), these steps are very helpful and provide structure where that may be lacking in theplanning process. When that process is much clearer, such as in the case for the Master Plan, theToR for the SEA can be much more detailed and tailored to the situation. In such a case, the tensteps have less added value.Within the contact of this report, the NCEA used these steps to structure the ToR in 5.1 and in5.3as well:Screening1. Reach consensus on the need for SEA and its link to planning2. Find stakeholders and announce start of the plan processScoping3. Develop a shared vision on problems/objectives/alternatives4. Do a consistency analysis: new versus existing objectives5. Set ToR for the technical assessment, based on scoping resultsAssessment6. Assess the impacts of alternatives and document this7. Organise (independent) quality assurance of documentationDecision making8. Discuss with all stakeholders the alternative to prefer9. Motivate the (political) decision in writingMonitoring10. Monitor the implementation and discuss the resultsDerived from: OECD-DAC Good Practice Guidance in Applying SEA in Development Co-operationAppendix 9 page -1-
Page 3:
we recommend the EKN to finance thi
Page 6 and 7:
List of abbreviationsEDPRS 2 Econom
Page 8 and 9:
1.2 SEA in Rwanda, involvement of N
Page 10 and 11:
2. Scoping part 1 - the setting of
Page 12 and 13:
During the Kigali workshop, it beca
Page 14 and 15:
very low. In this light the master
Page 16 and 17: showing commitment to the process b
Page 18 and 19: 3. Scoping part 2 - EKN’s IWRM Su
Page 20 and 21: Data AssessmentData assessment shou
Page 22 and 23: - For effective implementation of I
Page 24 and 25: effective IWRM, tailor-made solutio
Page 26 and 27: 9. If the EKN decides to start work
Page 28 and 29: As a consequence, the SEA design th
Page 30 and 31: 4.3 Implementation and management o
Page 32 and 33: interventions, for example) would a
Page 34 and 35: Needs assessment per sector: USAID
Page 36 and 37: include forms of review, but these
Page 38 and 39: 3. Master plan phase : 5 months. Th
Page 40 and 41: . Assess the way in which these ser
Page 42 and 43: Management of the SEAAs explained i
Page 44 and 45: 4. Do a consistency analysis: new v
Page 46 and 47: Figure 1: Analysis of development o
Page 48 and 49: APPENDICESScoping Advice for Dutch
Page 50 and 51: Appendix 1 page -2-
Page 56 and 57: APPENDIX 3Programme NCEA Scoping Mi
Page 58 and 59: APPENDIX 5List of workshop particip
Page 60 and 61: Roles within IWRMWorking in pairs,
Page 62 and 63: Catchment Flooding Waste water Poll
Page 64 and 65: Water Resources Management Sub-sect
show all

Scoping Advice for the Dutch IWRM Support Programme Rwanda

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?