Class, Productive and Unproductive Labour - Journal of Alternative ...
Class, Productive and Unproductive Labour - Journal of Alternative ...
Class, Productive and Unproductive Labour - Journal of Alternative ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Dr. Timothy Kerswellthat this assertion lacks a structural base. It is not untilthis assumption is questioned that it becomes possible toinquire into the nature <strong>of</strong> the relationship between workersin the global North <strong>and</strong> the global South.The potential for globalized resistance to capitalism is<strong>of</strong>ten assumed as early as when Marx (2011) wrote that“<strong>Labour</strong> in a white skin cannot emancipate itself where it isbr<strong>and</strong>ed in a black skin.” Few have dared to question whythis might not be the case. While Marx expresses a noblesentiment, the vast differences that exist between workers inthe global North <strong>and</strong> those in the global South tend tocontradict the notion that workers on either side <strong>of</strong> thisstructural divide share common interests or aspirations.By contrast, there are arguments which stress adistinction between productive <strong>and</strong> unproductive labour as adefining feature <strong>of</strong> class. Poulantzas (1975:210) arguedfirstly that not all waged workers form part <strong>of</strong> the workingclass, just because all members <strong>of</strong> the working classaccording to Marx are waged workers. According toPoulantzas, the distinction that determines whether or notwaged workers are part <strong>of</strong> the working class is whether theyare involved in productive labour in its Marxist sense. Formost Marxists, productive labour has nothing to do with theutility or content <strong>of</strong> the product, but simply that the labourin question produces surplus value.It is on the basis <strong>of</strong> the productive/unproductivedistinction that Poulantzas excludes many forms <strong>of</strong> wagedwork from the working class. For instance, Poulantzas says“labour…contributing to the realization <strong>of</strong> surplus value, isnot productive labour; wage earners in commerce,advertising, marketing, banking <strong>and</strong> insurance do notproduce surplus value <strong>and</strong> do not form part <strong>of</strong> the workingclass (Ibid).” More broadly, Poulantzas disqualifies allservices labour in general suggesting that such labour doesnot produce surplus value. It is the argument <strong>of</strong> Poulantzasthat services involve the exchange between revenue orincome <strong>and</strong> labour power. In the case <strong>of</strong> services,Poulantzas argues that labour power is being purchased inorder to consume it directly, rather than to consume it in a23