petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant ... - Election Law Blog

50aAppendix DD. Totality of the Circumstances-Senate Report FactorsThe Senate Report’s “list of typical factors is neithercomprehensive nor exclusive” and “there is no requirementthat a particular number of factors be proved, or that amajority of them point one way or the other.” Gingles, 478U.S. at 45, 106 S.Ct. 2752. Rather, the ultimate “questionwhether the political processes are equally open dependsupon a searching practical evaluation of the past andpresent reality, and on a functional view of the politicalprocess.” Id. (internal citations omitted).1. Senate Factor 2: Racial PolarizationThe second Senate factor evaluates the extent to whichvoting in the elections of the state or political subdivisionis racially polarized. Gingles, 478 U.S. at 37, 106 S.Ct.2752. In the three elections evaluated in which a Hispaniccandidate was on the ballot, the Hispanic candidate alwaysreceived more than 63% of the Hispanic vote and lessthan 31% of the non-Hispanic vote. (PL’s Tr. Ex. 26, atTable 1.) In the most extreme of the three elections, CityCouncil candidate Reza received 100% of the Hispanic voteand only 10% of the non-Hispanic vote, according to Dr.Engstrom’s ER estimates. (Id.) The Court finds that thestatistical evidence shows that racially polarized votingoccurred and the degree of polarization was significantin the last three elections involving Hispanic candidates.