petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant ... - Election Law Blog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

iiiTABLE OF CONTENTSPageQUESTION PRESENTED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iPARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING ANDRULE 29.6 STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiTABLE OF CONTENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iiiTABLE OF APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vTABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viPETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. . . . . . . .1OPINIONS BELOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1JURISDICTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORYPROVISIONS INVOLVED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1STATEMENT OF THE CASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5A. The One-Person, One-Vote Principle ofthe Fourteenth Amendment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5B. Section 2 Litigation Over The ElectoralSystem Of Irving, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6C. Proceedings Below . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
ivTable of ContentsPageREASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION. . . . .12I. This Petition Presents An ImportantQuestion That Has Divided The CircuitsAnd That This Court Should Settle . . . . . . . . . .13A. Whether States And Local Districts MustBe Drawn Based On Voter PopulationIs A Nationally Important Question. . . . . .13B. The Circuits Are Divided OnThe Proper Resolution OfThe Question Presented. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21II. Review Is Required Because TheFifth Circuit Incorrectly Decided ThisImportant And Unsettled Question . . . . . . . . . .26A. The Fourteenth Amendment’sOne-Person, One-Vote PrincipleSecures The Rights Of Voters. . . . . . . . . . .26B. The City’s Plan Per Se Violates TheOne-Person, One-Vote Principle . . . . . . . . .31CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
Page 3: iiPARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGAND RULE
Page 11: xCited AuthoritiesStatutes and Othe
Page 14 and 15: 1PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARIP
Page 16 and 17: 3The Court should grant the petitio
Page 18 and 19: 5has “an obligation to explain to
Page 20 and 21: 7because the City has substantially
Page 22 and 23: 9City of IrvingPopulation, Voting A
Page 24 and 25: 11The district court granted summar
Page 26 and 27: 13I. This Petition Presents An Impo
Page 28 and 29: 15First, the issue has increasingly
Page 30 and 31: 17wards had far more eligible voter
Page 32 and 33: 19or practice, they cannot claim to
Page 34 and 35: 21This case—in which the choice b
Page 36 and 37: 23two, five, or ten, or one-half.
Page 38 and 39: 25In Chen, the Fifth Circuit reache
Page 40: 27Importantly, then, the Fourteenth
Page 43 and 44: 30Tennessee voters’ dilution chal
Page 45 and 46: 32Under the Plan, as noted above, D
Page 47 and 48: 34slightly larger than 9.9%—prese
Page 49 and 50: 1aAppendix AAPPENDIX
Page 51 and 52: 2aAppendix APER CURIAM: *This case
Page 53 and 54: 4aAPPENDIX B — Appendix MEMORANDU
Page 55 and 56:
6aAppendix Bpopulation numbers are
Page 57 and 58:
8aAppendix Bwhich total population
Page 59 and 60:
10aAppendix Bthe court does acknowl
Page 61 and 62:
12aAppendix CON PETITION FOR REHEAR
Page 63 and 64:
14aAppendix DIrving’s at-large el
Page 65 and 66:
16aAppendix Dother things, the at-l
Page 67 and 68:
18aAppendix DThornburg v. Gingles,
Page 69 and 70:
20aAppendix Dfailed to establish a
Page 71 and 72:
22aAppendix Dcomplying with the Gin
Page 73 and 74:
24aAppendix Done-hundred percent co
Page 75 and 76:
26aAppendix Dhis opinion that would
Page 77 and 78:
28aAppendix Dto estimate the 2008 H
Page 79 and 80:
30aAppendix Dvotes of Hispanics hav
Page 81 and 82:
32aAppendix Daverage household size
Page 83 and 84:
34aAppendix DDr. Rives attempts to
Page 85 and 86:
36aAppendix Dwith sampling error ac
Page 87 and 88:
38aAppendix DIn his expert report,
Page 89 and 90:
40aAppendix DAs Dr. Rives pointed o
Page 91 and 92:
42aAppendix DC. Gingles II & III-Ra
Page 93 and 94:
44aAppendix Dthis methodology canno
Page 95 and 96:
46aAppendix Dthat the confidence th
Page 97 and 98:
48aAppendix Dto Dr. Alford’s hypo
Page 99 and 100:
50aAppendix DD. Totality of the Cir
Page 101 and 102:
52aAppendix DThe Court concludes th
Page 103 and 104:
54aAppendix DNotably, James Dickens
Page 105 and 106:
56aAppendix D1231, 1245-46, 173 L.E
Page 107 and 108:
58aAppendix D2. Proof of Changed De
Page 109 and 110:
60aAppendix DPlaintiff has not empl
Page 111 and 112:
62aAppendix Dthe way in which the v
Page 113 and 114:
64aAppendix Dthe requirement that t
Page 115 and 116:
66aAPPENDIX E — RELEVANT Appendix
Page 117:
68aAppendix Eof insurrection or reb
show all

petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to grant ... - Election Law Blog

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?