Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
28Table 2.1 Average Ultimate Strength and Standard Deviation for Angle Iron, Bar, andPlate Material Tested by Kirkaldy (1862).Type of Material TestedAverage TensileStrengthStandard Deviation ofTensile StrengthAngle Iron 53,190 psi 4,910 psi (9.2%)Bar 55,420 psi 7,530 psi (13.6%)Plate 48,500 psi 5,580 psi (11.5%)
29Figure 2.1 Fracture Showing Fibrous Nature of Wrought Iron. (Aston, 1949)Figure 2.2 Cross Section of Puddling Furnace (Johnson, 1928)
- Page 1 and 2: Purdue UniversityPurdue e-PubsJTRP
- Page 3: 1. Report No. 2. Government Accessi
- Page 6 and 7: epairing a bent wrought iron tensio
- Page 8 and 9: vPageCHAPTER 3TEST PROCEDURES FOR M
- Page 10 and 11: ixLIST OF FIGURESFigurePageFigure 1
- Page 12 and 13: xiFigurePageFigure 3.30 Top View of
- Page 14 and 15: xiiiFigurePageFigure 5.12 Typical T
- Page 16 and 17: xvAppendix FigurePageFigure D.7 Ini
- Page 18 and 19: viiiAppendix TablePageTable A.5 Det
- Page 20 and 21: iiiThe authors would also like to t
- Page 22 and 23: 2but also what material properties
- Page 24 and 25: 4microstructure of the metal. The c
- Page 26 and 27: 62. LITERATURE SEARCHBefore experim
- Page 28 and 29: 8imperfections, the performance of
- Page 30 and 31: 10wrought iron. Adding the slag aft
- Page 32 and 33: 12method for manufacturing wrought
- Page 34 and 35: 14patents for their process and tra
- Page 36 and 37: 16This method of testing of structu
- Page 38 and 39: 18plot of this percent elongation d
- Page 40 and 41: 20significant variation in the perc
- Page 42 and 43: 22The practice of restoring histori
- Page 44 and 45: 24Elleby, Wallace W. Sanders, F. Wa
- Page 46 and 47: 26From all the surveys that were di
- Page 50 and 51: 30Figure 2.3 Wrought Iron “Sponge
- Page 52 and 53: 32Histogram of Kirkaldy Wrought Iro
- Page 54 and 55: 34Percent Occurance in Range - %45.
- Page 56 and 57: 3660Combined Wrought Iron BarsTensi
- Page 58 and 59: 38The Bell Ford Bridge consisted of
- Page 60 and 61: 40Two. These samples were taken fro
- Page 62 and 63: 42specimens were of constant cross
- Page 64 and 65: 44Along with rectangular tensile co
- Page 66 and 67: 46After the initial test loading wa
- Page 68 and 69: 483.6 Fatigue TestingTo develop a b
- Page 70 and 71: 50The final specimen category consi
- Page 72 and 73: 52This analysis was completed using
- Page 74 and 75: 54After the initial test was comple
- Page 76 and 77: 56completed, but before the surface
- Page 78 and 79: 58readings, load cell readings and
- Page 80 and 81: 60Figure 3.3 Donated Eyebars 4 and
- Page 82 and 83: 62Figure 3.7 Heated Areas in Blue o
- Page 84 and 85: 64Figure 3.11 Detail Used in Groove
- Page 86 and 87: 66900080007000y = 27.153xR 2 = 0.99
- Page 88 and 89: 68Figure 3.19 Charpy Impact Testing
- Page 90 and 91: 70Figure 3.23 Eyebar Connection in
- Page 92 and 93: 72Figure 3.27 Eyebar A After Filler
- Page 94 and 95: 74Figure 3.31 Side View of Finished
- Page 96 and 97: 76Figure 3.35 Front View of Eyebar
29Figure 2.1 Fracture Showing Fibrous Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong>. (Aston, 1949)Figure 2.2 Cross Section <strong>of</strong> Puddling Furnace (Johnson, 1928)
Change language