Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

10.07.2015 Views

24Elleby, Wallace W. Sanders, F. Wayne Klaiber, and Douglas Reeves (1976) discusses thetesting that was performed on the eyebars from both of the bridges.The eyebars of the bridges were tested both cyclically and statically. Themajority of the testing concentrated on the fatigue testing of the wrought iron eyebars.Both fatigue and static type tests were performed on both undamaged and damagedeyebars. The damaged eyebars were actually undamaged eyebars that had beenpurposefully damaged in the laboratory and then repaired. Three types of repair weresimulated on the eyebars and investigated. The first type was repair of a fracture in theforging area near a turnbuckle. The second was a fracture at the neck of an eye that hadbeen welded together with splice bars. The third was a fracture in the eye where theentire eye was removed and a new eye was formed out of cold rolled bar stock.Of the fatigue tests performed, it was found that the repairs made to the eyes didnot significantly affect the fatigue life of the eye. Instead, the life of the eye connectionwas governed by the characteristics of the eye. For the static testing, the repairprocedures affected the resulting tensile strength of the eye. This is especially true whenadding a new eye with a welded splice plate connection. Failures in these tests weregoverned by the quality of the forges in the eye connection. From both the fatigue andstatic testing it can be concluded that the repair procedures used on the eyes areacceptable when repairing the eyebar members of a bridge.2.3.4 Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, Wabash Railroad, 1888The Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge spans the Mississippi river betweenIllinois and Missouri and consists of seven truss spans and one continuous swing span fora total length of 1,580ft. The bridge consists of riveted built up compression membersand tension eyebars. It has undergone many repairs during its service life. These repairsincluded shortening of the spans and tightening of the eyebars. To tighten the eyebars, a

25piece was cut out from the center of the eyebar. The two cut ends were then drawn closerto each other and splice plates were welded on either side. The splice plates used were amild steel material.The paper Fatigue Behavior of Welded Wrought-Iron Bridge Hangers by Peter B.Keating, John W. Fisher, Ben T. Yen, and William J. Frank (1984) investigates the spliceplate repair in detail. While doing a visual inspection of these splice plate repairs fatiguecracking was found across the toe of the transverse welds of the detail. Fatigue crackingwas also found in the welded gap at the center of the lap splice. To further investigatethis repair procedure, laboratory fatigue tests were completed on both actual spliceddetails from the bridge and fabricated details.Similar to the splice plate details on the bridge, the details that were testeddeveloped surface cracks at the toe of the splice plates that were welded to the surface ofthe wrought iron eyebars. These cracks developed at cyclic lives that were comparable tothe lives of the steel components. The cracks in the wrought iron were arrested by theslag deposits dispersed throughout the metal. Therefore, they did not have an adverseeffect on the fatigue resistance of the wrought iron. The investigation of this repairdemonstrates that using a splice plate method to shorten or tighten eyebars in a bridgecould be an acceptable method of repair.2.4 Survey ResultsTo determine if there were any existing maintenance and repair procedures thatexisted through out the country, a survey was created and distributed to all fifty StateDepartments of Transportation and Local Technical Assistant Programs. To determine ifthere were any formal repair procedures in the state of Indiana, a survey was distributedand sent to the engineer or highway supervisor in all ninety-two county highwaydepartments in Indiana and some various bridge engineering design consultants.

25piece was cut out from the center <strong>of</strong> the eyebar. The two cut ends were then drawn closerto each other <strong>and</strong> splice plates were welded on either side. The splice plates used were amild steel material.The paper Fatigue Behavior <strong>of</strong> Welded <strong>Wrought</strong>-<strong>Iron</strong> Bridge Hangers by Peter B.Keating, John W. Fisher, Ben T. Yen, <strong>and</strong> William J. Frank (1984) investigates the spliceplate repair in detail. While doing a visual inspection <strong>of</strong> these splice plate repairs fatiguecracking was found across the toe <strong>of</strong> the transverse welds <strong>of</strong> the detail. Fatigue crackingwas also found in the welded gap at the center <strong>of</strong> the lap splice. To further investigatethis repair procedure, laboratory fatigue tests were completed on both actual spliceddetails from the bridge <strong>and</strong> fabricated details.Similar to the splice plate details on the bridge, the details that were testeddeveloped surface cracks at the toe <strong>of</strong> the splice plates that were welded to the surface <strong>of</strong>the wrought iron eyebars. These cracks developed at cyclic lives that were comparable tothe lives <strong>of</strong> the steel components. The cracks in the wrought iron were arrested by theslag deposits dispersed throughout the metal. Therefore, they did not have an adverseeffect on the fatigue resistance <strong>of</strong> the wrought iron. The investigation <strong>of</strong> this repairdemonstrates that using a splice plate method to shorten or tighten eyebars in a bridgecould be an acceptable method <strong>of</strong> repair.2.4 Survey ResultsTo determine if there were any existing maintenance <strong>and</strong> repair procedures thatexisted through out the country, a survey was created <strong>and</strong> distributed to all fifty StateDepartments <strong>of</strong> Transportation <strong>and</strong> Local Technical Assistant Programs. To determine ifthere were any formal repair procedures in the state <strong>of</strong> Indiana, a survey was distributed<strong>and</strong> sent to the engineer or highway supervisor in all ninety-two county highwaydepartments in Indiana <strong>and</strong> some various bridge engineering design consultants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!