Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
xvAppendix FigurePageFigure D.7 Initial Pass Pattern on Eyebar B ................................................................... 220Figure D.8 Initial Pass Pattern on Eyebar A................................................................... 220Figure D.9 Resulting Heat Distortion From Welding in Eyebar B................................. 221Figure D.10 Heating of Eyebar Connection B to Cherry Red Color beforeStraightening ........................................................................................................... 221
viiLIST OF TABLESTablePageTable 2.1 Table of Ultimate Strength and Standard Deviation for Angle Iron, Bar, andPlate Material Tested by Kirkaldy (1862)………………………………………….28Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Eyebars 1 and 2………………………………………..94Table 4.2 Tensile Coupon Test Results for Eyebars……………………………………..95Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Results for Round Bars…………………………………96Table 4.4 Average and Standard Deviation of Tensile Coupon Test Results……………97Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Results…………………………………………………...98Table 4.6 Average Charpy Impact Strength from Testing and Literature for CertainTemperatures……………………………………………………………………….99Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain Gage Readings at Various Locations During ElasticLoading for Eyebar Connection Testing………………………………………….100Table 4.8 Eyebar Connection Results (Regular and Repaired)………………………...101Table 4.9 Elongation of Pin Holes in Eyebar Connections…………………………….101Appendix TablePageTable A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensile Strength Reported by Kirkaldy…………………152Table A.2 Wrought Iron Plate Tensile Strength Data Reported by Kirkaldy………….155Table A.3 Wrought Iron Angle Tensile Strength Data Reported by Kirkaldy………...158Table A.4 Summary of Wrought Iron Bar Tensile Strength, Elastic Limit (Yield Strength)Data of 959 Specimens Reported by Beardslee……………………….…………159
- Page 1 and 2: Purdue UniversityPurdue e-PubsJTRP
- Page 3: 1. Report No. 2. Government Accessi
- Page 6 and 7: epairing a bent wrought iron tensio
- Page 8 and 9: vPageCHAPTER 3TEST PROCEDURES FOR M
- Page 10 and 11: ixLIST OF FIGURESFigurePageFigure 1
- Page 12 and 13: xiFigurePageFigure 3.30 Top View of
- Page 14 and 15: xiiiFigurePageFigure 5.12 Typical T
- Page 18 and 19: viiiAppendix TablePageTable A.5 Det
- Page 20 and 21: iiiThe authors would also like to t
- Page 22 and 23: 2but also what material properties
- Page 24 and 25: 4microstructure of the metal. The c
- Page 26 and 27: 62. LITERATURE SEARCHBefore experim
- Page 28 and 29: 8imperfections, the performance of
- Page 30 and 31: 10wrought iron. Adding the slag aft
- Page 32 and 33: 12method for manufacturing wrought
- Page 34 and 35: 14patents for their process and tra
- Page 36 and 37: 16This method of testing of structu
- Page 38 and 39: 18plot of this percent elongation d
- Page 40 and 41: 20significant variation in the perc
- Page 42 and 43: 22The practice of restoring histori
- Page 44 and 45: 24Elleby, Wallace W. Sanders, F. Wa
- Page 46 and 47: 26From all the surveys that were di
- Page 48 and 49: 28Table 2.1 Average Ultimate Streng
- Page 50 and 51: 30Figure 2.3 Wrought Iron “Sponge
- Page 52 and 53: 32Histogram of Kirkaldy Wrought Iro
- Page 54 and 55: 34Percent Occurance in Range - %45.
- Page 56 and 57: 3660Combined Wrought Iron BarsTensi
- Page 58 and 59: 38The Bell Ford Bridge consisted of
- Page 60 and 61: 40Two. These samples were taken fro
- Page 62 and 63: 42specimens were of constant cross
- Page 64 and 65: 44Along with rectangular tensile co
viiLIST OF TABLESTablePageTable 2.1 Table <strong>of</strong> Ultimate Strength <strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation for Angle <strong>Iron</strong>, Bar, <strong>and</strong>Plate Material Tested by Kirkaldy (1862)………………………………………….28Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Eyebars 1 <strong>and</strong> 2………………………………………..94Table 4.2 Tensile Coupon Test Results for Eyebars……………………………………..95Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Results for Round Bars…………………………………96Table 4.4 Average <strong>and</strong> St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation <strong>of</strong> Tensile Coupon Test Results……………97Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Results…………………………………………………...98Table 4.6 Average Charpy Impact Strength from Testing <strong>and</strong> Literature for CertainTemperatures……………………………………………………………………….99Table 4.7 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Strain Gage Readings at Various Locations During ElasticLoading for Eyebar Connection Testing………………………………………….100Table 4.8 Eyebar Connection Results (Regular <strong>and</strong> <strong>Repair</strong>ed)………………………...101Table 4.9 Elongation <strong>of</strong> Pin Holes in Eyebar Connections…………………………….101Appendix TablePageTable A.1 <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Bar Tensile Strength Reported by Kirkaldy…………………152Table A.2 <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Plate Tensile Strength Data Reported by Kirkaldy………….155Table A.3 <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Angle Tensile Strength Data Reported by Kirkaldy………...158Table A.4 Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wrought</strong> <strong>Iron</strong> Bar Tensile Strength, Elastic Limit (Yield Strength)Data <strong>of</strong> 959 Specimens Reported by Beardslee……………………….…………159
Change language