Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
130Figure 5.3 Picture of Bottom Chord of Laughery Creek Bridge, Spanning LaugheryCreek, Aurora vicinity, Dearborn County, IN (Historic American BuildingsSurvey/Historic American Engineering Record)Figure 5.4 Typical Eye Pin Connection (Walnut Street Bridge, Spanning SusquehannaRiver at Walnut Street, Dauphin County, PA - Historic American BuildingsSurvey/Historic American Engineering Record)
131Figure 5.5 Sketch of Typical Resulting Unsymmetrical Condition of a Pin Connection(Taavoni, 1994).Figure 5.6 Using Heat to Help Remove a Pin During a Rehabilitation of a Bridge InPlainfield, IN.
- Page 100 and 101: 80The carbon content present in the
- Page 102 and 103: 82value may not be very accurate bu
- Page 104 and 105: 84strengths was found to be 29,940
- Page 106 and 107: 86wrought iron bars were investigat
- Page 108 and 109: 88stresses are induced. These perma
- Page 110 and 111: 90toughness the material. The test
- Page 112 and 113: 92From the finite element analysis,
- Page 114 and 115: 94Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Ey
- Page 116 and 117: 96Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Res
- Page 118 and 119: 98Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Resu
- Page 120 and 121: 100Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain G
- Page 122 and 123: 102Figure 4.1 Typical Micrograph of
- Page 124 and 125: 104Figure 4.5 Fracture Surface of D
- Page 126 and 127: 106Comparison of Tensile Strengthfo
- Page 128 and 129: 108Combined Wrought Iron Bar Histor
- Page 130 and 131: 110Figure 4.17 Macrograph of Weld u
- Page 132 and 133: 112Figure 4.21 Cleavage Fracture of
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 4.25 Elongation of Hole in E
- Page 136 and 137: 116signs on or near the bridge that
- Page 138 and 139: 118testing of historic wrought iron
- Page 140 and 141: 120so that they would act in symmet
- Page 142 and 143: 122The reasons for the differences
- Page 144 and 145: 124The second corrosion pattern mod
- Page 146 and 147: 126Keating (1984) stated that the s
- Page 148 and 149: 128charcoal fire until it is red ho
- Page 152 and 153: 132Figure 5.7 Using Force After Usi
- Page 154 and 155: 134Figure 5.11 Reassembling a Pin C
- Page 156 and 157: 1366. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPL
- Page 158 and 159: 138rectangular in shape. These eyeb
- Page 160 and 161: 140were joined together with a full
- Page 162 and 163: 1424. The Charpy impact energy of t
- Page 164 and 165: 144connections are unsymmetrical, i
- Page 166 and 167: 146LIST OF REFERENCESAASHTO (1998).
- Page 168 and 169: 148Hodgkinson, Eaton (1840). Experi
- Page 170 and 171: 150Appendix A. Data Collected From
- Page 172 and 173: 152Table A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensi
- Page 174 and 175: 154Table A.1 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 176 and 177: 156Table A.2 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 178 and 179: 158Table A.3 Wrought Iron Angle Ten
- Page 180 and 181: 160Table A.4 (continued) Summary of
- Page 182 and 183: 162Table A.4 (continued) Summary of
- Page 184 and 185: 164Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 186 and 187: 166Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 188 and 189: 168Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 190 and 191: 170Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 192 and 193: 172Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 194 and 195: 174Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 196 and 197: 176Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 198 and 199: 178Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
131Figure 5.5 Sketch <strong>of</strong> Typical Resulting Unsymmetrical Condition <strong>of</strong> a Pin Connection(Taavoni, 1994).Figure 5.6 Using Heat to Help Remove a Pin During a Rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> a Bridge InPlainfield, IN.
Change language