10.07.2015 Views

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

121A study conducted at Iowa State University in 1976 on the strength <strong>of</strong> eyebarconnections included some fatigue testing on damaged <strong>and</strong> undamaged eyebars. Fatiguetests were completed on twenty three undamaged eyebars <strong>and</strong> nine damaged <strong>and</strong> repairedeyebars. Of the undamaged eyebars, twenty one failed in one <strong>of</strong> the eyes <strong>of</strong> the eyebar.Of the damaged <strong>and</strong> repaired eyebars only two fractured in the presence <strong>of</strong> a repair <strong>and</strong>the rest failed in the eyes (Elleby, 1976).The results from testing completed in this study <strong>and</strong> from the testing at Iowa StateUniversity support the need to check for fatigue cracking at the holes <strong>of</strong> the eyebars.This is especially true since these members are considered to be fracture critical <strong>and</strong> havebeen in service for such a long time.Regardless <strong>of</strong> the geometry, existing eyebars tend to perform well <strong>and</strong> fail outside<strong>of</strong> the connection area under static loading conditions. Evidence <strong>of</strong> this can be seen inthe testing that was completed during this research study. Four eyebar connections werestatically tested in tension until they failed. All <strong>of</strong> the eyebar connections failed outside<strong>of</strong> the connection detail area.Testing that was completed at Iowa State University in 1976 also included statictesting on eyebars. In this testing, seventeen undamaged specimens <strong>and</strong> three damaged<strong>and</strong> repaired specimens were tested. Of these eyebars, none failed in the eye <strong>and</strong> allfailed either in the shank <strong>of</strong> the eyebar or at an original forging (Elleby, 1976).Therefore, for the statically tested specimens, the eye connections <strong>of</strong> the eyebars areadequate but the forgings in the eyebars need to also be checked for cracking.Charpy impact testing <strong>of</strong> historic wrought iron was also completed in the presentstudy to determine the fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> the material. Charpy impact specimens weremachined from eyebars in different orientations simulating crack growth in differentdirection along the eyebar. It was determined that the fracture toughness <strong>of</strong> wrought ironvaries according to the direction <strong>of</strong> crack growth in the material.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!