Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
118testing of historic wrought iron would show that the tensile strength is typically lowerthan the tensile strength found in most structural steels.5.2 Verification and Repair of Connection SymmetryIn the beginning of a bridge examination it is important to inspect the bottomchord members for any misalignment either vertical or horizontal which may indicatefailure of the joint connections or the need for adjustments of an individual truss member.In historic metal truss bridges, it is very common for the bottom chord to consist of pairsof eyebars with pin connections. Figure 5.3 is a photograph of a typical bottom chordfound on many historic wrought iron truss bridges.The pin connections consist of multiple two component eyebar members and aone component diagonal member that are connected by a large diameter pin. Figure 5.4shows a typical eye pin connection. In the original design of the bridge, the eye pinconnections are symmetric in the third dimension to ensure that force is equallydistributed amongst all the members. But over time, the members can move and theconnection losses symmetry due to dynamic live load effects on the bridge and theaddition of past repairs. Figure 5.5 is a drawing of a typical pin connection that hasbecome unsymmetrical due to a shift in the diagonal.Since the capacity of a truss bridge is usually analyzed two dimensionally, it isimportant that the eye pin connections remain symmetric to ensure that the forces areequally distributed and the actual behavior of the bridge is two dimensional. If theconnections are not symmetric, a buckling or fracture could occur in members fromlateral forces in the third dimension. Moreover, past repairs to these bridges may includeadding another component to a two component member to increase the capacity. Thisrepair, however, alters the symmetric properties in the bridge and actually causes moreserious problems within the bridge.
119If an existing historic bridge has connections that are lacking symmetry the thirdcomponent members should be removed and the original members should be moved sothe connections are acting symmetrically again. To ensure that future symmetricalbehavior is present in the bridge, spacers are typically added in the connection.5.3 Damaged Pin ReplacementOnce the connections are evaluated symmetrically, the capacity of theconnections should also be determined. One essential part of the connection that couldcontrol the capacity are the eye pins. An analysis of the forces that are acting on the pinsshould be performed to determine their live load capacity. In one historical bridgerehabilitation, the analysis indicated that the pins had very little live-load capacity andgoverned the load rating of the bridge (Taavoni, 1994). If it is determined that the pin’slive load capacity is not adequate, the existing pins should be removed and theconnections should be replaced.Difficulties typically arise upon removing the pins in the truss bridges. This isbecause they often are severely corroded and strained or deflected. If the pins areseverely bent it may indicate that they were undergoing too much force and their removalis appropriate. The addition of heat causes thermal expansion and is often used alongwith force when removing the pins to help in the difficult process, as seen in Figure 5.6and Figure 5.7. After the pins are removed, it is common to replace them with a higherstrength material and place spacers to ensure symmetry in the connections. Replacing theexisting pins with higher strength pins could increase the load capacity of the bridge andbe an affordable alternative to bridge replacement.In the case of the Carroll Road Bridge in Maryland, the existing pins werereplaced with new higher strength pins and the members of the connections were moved
- Page 88 and 89: 68Figure 3.19 Charpy Impact Testing
- Page 90 and 91: 70Figure 3.23 Eyebar Connection in
- Page 92 and 93: 72Figure 3.27 Eyebar A After Filler
- Page 94 and 95: 74Figure 3.31 Side View of Finished
- Page 96 and 97: 76Figure 3.35 Front View of Eyebar
- Page 98 and 99: 78strength from the existence of pe
- Page 100 and 101: 80The carbon content present in the
- Page 102 and 103: 82value may not be very accurate bu
- Page 104 and 105: 84strengths was found to be 29,940
- Page 106 and 107: 86wrought iron bars were investigat
- Page 108 and 109: 88stresses are induced. These perma
- Page 110 and 111: 90toughness the material. The test
- Page 112 and 113: 92From the finite element analysis,
- Page 114 and 115: 94Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Ey
- Page 116 and 117: 96Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Res
- Page 118 and 119: 98Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Resu
- Page 120 and 121: 100Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain G
- Page 122 and 123: 102Figure 4.1 Typical Micrograph of
- Page 124 and 125: 104Figure 4.5 Fracture Surface of D
- Page 126 and 127: 106Comparison of Tensile Strengthfo
- Page 128 and 129: 108Combined Wrought Iron Bar Histor
- Page 130 and 131: 110Figure 4.17 Macrograph of Weld u
- Page 132 and 133: 112Figure 4.21 Cleavage Fracture of
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 4.25 Elongation of Hole in E
- Page 136 and 137: 116signs on or near the bridge that
- Page 140 and 141: 120so that they would act in symmet
- Page 142 and 143: 122The reasons for the differences
- Page 144 and 145: 124The second corrosion pattern mod
- Page 146 and 147: 126Keating (1984) stated that the s
- Page 148 and 149: 128charcoal fire until it is red ho
- Page 150 and 151: 130Figure 5.3 Picture of Bottom Cho
- Page 152 and 153: 132Figure 5.7 Using Force After Usi
- Page 154 and 155: 134Figure 5.11 Reassembling a Pin C
- Page 156 and 157: 1366. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPL
- Page 158 and 159: 138rectangular in shape. These eyeb
- Page 160 and 161: 140were joined together with a full
- Page 162 and 163: 1424. The Charpy impact energy of t
- Page 164 and 165: 144connections are unsymmetrical, i
- Page 166 and 167: 146LIST OF REFERENCESAASHTO (1998).
- Page 168 and 169: 148Hodgkinson, Eaton (1840). Experi
- Page 170 and 171: 150Appendix A. Data Collected From
- Page 172 and 173: 152Table A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensi
- Page 174 and 175: 154Table A.1 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 176 and 177: 156Table A.2 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 178 and 179: 158Table A.3 Wrought Iron Angle Ten
- Page 180 and 181: 160Table A.4 (continued) Summary of
- Page 182 and 183: 162Table A.4 (continued) Summary of
- Page 184 and 185: 164Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
- Page 186 and 187: 166Table A.5 (continued) Detailed I
119If an existing historic bridge has connections that are lacking symmetry the thirdcomponent members should be removed <strong>and</strong> the original members should be moved sothe connections are acting symmetrically again. To ensure that future symmetricalbehavior is present in the bridge, spacers are typically added in the connection.5.3 Damaged Pin ReplacementOnce the connections are evaluated symmetrically, the capacity <strong>of</strong> theconnections should also be determined. One essential part <strong>of</strong> the connection that couldcontrol the capacity are the eye pins. An analysis <strong>of</strong> the forces that are acting on the pinsshould be performed to determine their live load capacity. In one historical bridgerehabilitation, the analysis indicated that the pins had very little live-load capacity <strong>and</strong>governed the load rating <strong>of</strong> the bridge (Taavoni, 1994). If it is determined that the pin’slive load capacity is not adequate, the existing pins should be removed <strong>and</strong> theconnections should be replaced.Difficulties typically arise upon removing the pins in the truss bridges. This isbecause they <strong>of</strong>ten are severely corroded <strong>and</strong> strained or deflected. If the pins areseverely bent it may indicate that they were undergoing too much force <strong>and</strong> their removalis appropriate. The addition <strong>of</strong> heat causes thermal expansion <strong>and</strong> is <strong>of</strong>ten used alongwith force when removing the pins to help in the difficult process, as seen in Figure 5.6<strong>and</strong> Figure 5.7. After the pins are removed, it is common to replace them with a higherstrength material <strong>and</strong> place spacers to ensure symmetry in the connections. Replacing theexisting pins with higher strength pins could increase the load capacity <strong>of</strong> the bridge <strong>and</strong>be an affordable alternative to bridge replacement.In the case <strong>of</strong> the Carroll Road Bridge in Maryl<strong>and</strong>, the existing pins werereplaced with new higher strength pins <strong>and</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the connections were moved