10.07.2015 Views

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116signs on or near the bridge that might lead to an estimate <strong>of</strong> the age <strong>and</strong> manufacturer <strong>of</strong>the existing bridge. Figure 5.1 is an example <strong>of</strong> a typical sign that marks the year thebridge was constructed <strong>and</strong> the manufacturer.Once the manufacturer <strong>and</strong> age <strong>of</strong> the bridge is collected, an estimate can be made<strong>of</strong> the materials utilized in the existing bridge. Typically in the Midwest, bridges thatwere constructed approximately before the late 1890s consist <strong>of</strong> historic wrought irontension members with either wrought iron, cast iron, or timber compression members.Bridges constructed approximately after the late 1890’s were primarily constructed usingsteel.Often it is useful to fully clean a piece <strong>of</strong> metal by removing any surfacecorrosion <strong>and</strong> investigate its surface appearance to determine if the metal is wrought iron.This is because wrought iron has distinctive slag inclusions that are <strong>of</strong>ten present on thesurface <strong>of</strong> the metal <strong>and</strong> visible by the naked eye. These inclusions are typically darkerthan the rest <strong>of</strong> the metal <strong>and</strong> are elongated in one direction. Figure 5.2 is a photograph<strong>of</strong> a test coupon that shows some <strong>of</strong> these large surface inclusions.If during the bridge inspection some fractured tension members are found, theappearance <strong>of</strong> the fractured surface could help to identify if the metal is wrought iron orsteel. <strong>Wrought</strong> iron’s fractured surfaces that had failed in tension are typically fibrous<strong>and</strong> jagged in nature unlike typical smooth <strong>and</strong> angled fractured surfaces <strong>of</strong> steel.Typically there is very little necking near the fractured surface <strong>of</strong> wrought iron which iscommon in steel. Figures 4.4 <strong>and</strong> 4.5 illustrate the differences between the fracturesurface for both wrought iron <strong>and</strong> steel.If it is determined that the bridge being investigated is most likely historicalwrought iron, the AASHTO Manual for Condition <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Bridges (1994)recommends using an operating maximum unit stress <strong>of</strong> 20,000 psi, <strong>and</strong> an inventorymaximum unit stress <strong>of</strong> 14,000 psi when determining the load rating for these bridges.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!