Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
110Figure 4.17 Macrograph of Weld used in Welded Tensile Testing CouponsWelded Specimen Comparison of Tensile Strength510004900047000Ultimate Strength (psi)4500043000410003900037000350000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular Specimens Welded SpecimensFigure 4.18 Comparison of Welded Specimens for Tensile Strength and Yield Stress
111Welded Specimen Comparison of Percent Elongation2520Percent Elongation %1510500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular Specimens Welded SpecimensFigure 4.19 Comparison of Welded Specimens for Percent ElongationCharpy Impact Test Results605040Impact Energy (ft lbs)3020100-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80Temperature, o FLongitudinal Notched to the Side (LS)Longitudinal Notched to the Top (LU)Transversed Notched to the Side (T)Charpy Specimen from Round Bars (-charpy)Base Metal Charpy V-Notch Requirements for Fracture Critical Members per A36 SteelFigure 4.20 Charpy Impact Testing Results
- Page 80 and 81: 60Figure 3.3 Donated Eyebars 4 and
- Page 82 and 83: 62Figure 3.7 Heated Areas in Blue o
- Page 84 and 85: 64Figure 3.11 Detail Used in Groove
- Page 86 and 87: 66900080007000y = 27.153xR 2 = 0.99
- Page 88 and 89: 68Figure 3.19 Charpy Impact Testing
- Page 90 and 91: 70Figure 3.23 Eyebar Connection in
- Page 92 and 93: 72Figure 3.27 Eyebar A After Filler
- Page 94 and 95: 74Figure 3.31 Side View of Finished
- Page 96 and 97: 76Figure 3.35 Front View of Eyebar
- Page 98 and 99: 78strength from the existence of pe
- Page 100 and 101: 80The carbon content present in the
- Page 102 and 103: 82value may not be very accurate bu
- Page 104 and 105: 84strengths was found to be 29,940
- Page 106 and 107: 86wrought iron bars were investigat
- Page 108 and 109: 88stresses are induced. These perma
- Page 110 and 111: 90toughness the material. The test
- Page 112 and 113: 92From the finite element analysis,
- Page 114 and 115: 94Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Ey
- Page 116 and 117: 96Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Res
- Page 118 and 119: 98Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Resu
- Page 120 and 121: 100Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain G
- Page 122 and 123: 102Figure 4.1 Typical Micrograph of
- Page 124 and 125: 104Figure 4.5 Fracture Surface of D
- Page 126 and 127: 106Comparison of Tensile Strengthfo
- Page 128 and 129: 108Combined Wrought Iron Bar Histor
- Page 132 and 133: 112Figure 4.21 Cleavage Fracture of
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 4.25 Elongation of Hole in E
- Page 136 and 137: 116signs on or near the bridge that
- Page 138 and 139: 118testing of historic wrought iron
- Page 140 and 141: 120so that they would act in symmet
- Page 142 and 143: 122The reasons for the differences
- Page 144 and 145: 124The second corrosion pattern mod
- Page 146 and 147: 126Keating (1984) stated that the s
- Page 148 and 149: 128charcoal fire until it is red ho
- Page 150 and 151: 130Figure 5.3 Picture of Bottom Cho
- Page 152 and 153: 132Figure 5.7 Using Force After Usi
- Page 154 and 155: 134Figure 5.11 Reassembling a Pin C
- Page 156 and 157: 1366. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPL
- Page 158 and 159: 138rectangular in shape. These eyeb
- Page 160 and 161: 140were joined together with a full
- Page 162 and 163: 1424. The Charpy impact energy of t
- Page 164 and 165: 144connections are unsymmetrical, i
- Page 166 and 167: 146LIST OF REFERENCESAASHTO (1998).
- Page 168 and 169: 148Hodgkinson, Eaton (1840). Experi
- Page 170 and 171: 150Appendix A. Data Collected From
- Page 172 and 173: 152Table A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensi
- Page 174 and 175: 154Table A.1 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 176 and 177: 156Table A.2 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 178 and 179: 158Table A.3 Wrought Iron Angle Ten
111Welded Specimen Comparison <strong>of</strong> Percent Elongation2520Percent Elongation %1510500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular Specimens Welded SpecimensFigure 4.19 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Welded Specimens for Percent ElongationCharpy Impact Test Results605040Impact Energy (ft lbs)3020100-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80Temperature, o FLongitudinal Notched to the Side (LS)Longitudinal Notched to the Top (LU)Transversed Notched to the Side (T)Charpy Specimen from Round Bars (-charpy)Base Metal Charpy V-Notch Requirements for Fracture Critical Members per A36 SteelFigure 4.20 Charpy Impact Testing Results
Change language