Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ... Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...
108Combined Wrought Iron Bar Historic Data and Testing ResultsTensile Tests - Percent Elongation403530Standard DeviationPercent Elongation252015Standard DeviationMean = 23.2%105Second Standard Deviation = 8%00 100 200 300 400 500 600Sample (Random)Kirkaldy Data Beardslee Data Testing Results (eyebar) Testing Results (round)Figure 4.13 Comparison of Historical to Testing Results for Percent ElongationHeat Straightened Specimen Comparison of Tensile Strength5500050000Ultimate Strength (psi)450004000035000300000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular SpecimensHeat Straightened SpecimensFigure 4.14 Comparison of Heated Straightened Specimens for Tensile Strength
109Heat Straightened Specimen Comparison of Percent Elongation2520Percent Elongation %1510500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular SpecimensHeat Straightened SpecimensFigure 4.15 Comparison of Heated Straightened Specimens for Percent ElongationFigure 4.16 Mechanically Straightened Coupon Resulting Percent Elongation
- Page 78 and 79: 58readings, load cell readings and
- Page 80 and 81: 60Figure 3.3 Donated Eyebars 4 and
- Page 82 and 83: 62Figure 3.7 Heated Areas in Blue o
- Page 84 and 85: 64Figure 3.11 Detail Used in Groove
- Page 86 and 87: 66900080007000y = 27.153xR 2 = 0.99
- Page 88 and 89: 68Figure 3.19 Charpy Impact Testing
- Page 90 and 91: 70Figure 3.23 Eyebar Connection in
- Page 92 and 93: 72Figure 3.27 Eyebar A After Filler
- Page 94 and 95: 74Figure 3.31 Side View of Finished
- Page 96 and 97: 76Figure 3.35 Front View of Eyebar
- Page 98 and 99: 78strength from the existence of pe
- Page 100 and 101: 80The carbon content present in the
- Page 102 and 103: 82value may not be very accurate bu
- Page 104 and 105: 84strengths was found to be 29,940
- Page 106 and 107: 86wrought iron bars were investigat
- Page 108 and 109: 88stresses are induced. These perma
- Page 110 and 111: 90toughness the material. The test
- Page 112 and 113: 92From the finite element analysis,
- Page 114 and 115: 94Table 4.1 Chemical Analysis of Ey
- Page 116 and 117: 96Table 4.3 Tensile Coupon Test Res
- Page 118 and 119: 98Table 4.5 Charpy Impact Test Resu
- Page 120 and 121: 100Table 4.7 Comparison of Strain G
- Page 122 and 123: 102Figure 4.1 Typical Micrograph of
- Page 124 and 125: 104Figure 4.5 Fracture Surface of D
- Page 126 and 127: 106Comparison of Tensile Strengthfo
- Page 130 and 131: 110Figure 4.17 Macrograph of Weld u
- Page 132 and 133: 112Figure 4.21 Cleavage Fracture of
- Page 134 and 135: Figure 4.25 Elongation of Hole in E
- Page 136 and 137: 116signs on or near the bridge that
- Page 138 and 139: 118testing of historic wrought iron
- Page 140 and 141: 120so that they would act in symmet
- Page 142 and 143: 122The reasons for the differences
- Page 144 and 145: 124The second corrosion pattern mod
- Page 146 and 147: 126Keating (1984) stated that the s
- Page 148 and 149: 128charcoal fire until it is red ho
- Page 150 and 151: 130Figure 5.3 Picture of Bottom Cho
- Page 152 and 153: 132Figure 5.7 Using Force After Usi
- Page 154 and 155: 134Figure 5.11 Reassembling a Pin C
- Page 156 and 157: 1366. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPL
- Page 158 and 159: 138rectangular in shape. These eyeb
- Page 160 and 161: 140were joined together with a full
- Page 162 and 163: 1424. The Charpy impact energy of t
- Page 164 and 165: 144connections are unsymmetrical, i
- Page 166 and 167: 146LIST OF REFERENCESAASHTO (1998).
- Page 168 and 169: 148Hodgkinson, Eaton (1840). Experi
- Page 170 and 171: 150Appendix A. Data Collected From
- Page 172 and 173: 152Table A.1 Wrought Iron Bar Tensi
- Page 174 and 175: 154Table A.1 (continued) Wrought Ir
- Page 176 and 177: 156Table A.2 (continued) Wrought Ir
109Heat Straightened Specimen Comparison <strong>of</strong> Percent Elongation2520Percent Elongation %1510500 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10SampleRegular SpecimensHeat Straightened SpecimensFigure 4.15 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Heated Straightened Specimens for Percent ElongationFigure 4.16 Mechanically Straightened Coupon Resulting Percent Elongation
Change language