10.07.2015 Views

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

Evaluation and Repair of Wrought Iron and - Purdue e-Pubs ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86wrought iron bars were investigated, because this material was commonly used for bridgeconstruction.The tensile strengths from the testing <strong>and</strong> historical data can be seen in the plot inFigure 4.12. In the plot, the results from the tensile testing conducted for this study fallbelow the mean found for the historical data <strong>and</strong> mostly are near the lower st<strong>and</strong>arddeviation <strong>of</strong> this data. All <strong>of</strong> the testing results except for one, were above the secondst<strong>and</strong>ard deviation from the mean <strong>of</strong> the historical data. For a set <strong>of</strong> data, sixty-eightpercent <strong>of</strong> the data falls within one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> the mean <strong>and</strong> ninety-five percentfalls within the second st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. This second st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> 40,000 psicould be used as a conservative estimate <strong>of</strong> the tensile strength <strong>of</strong> historic wrought iron.The percent elongation values collected from historic data were also compared tothe percent elongation values found in this study. Figure 4.13 is a plot <strong>of</strong> these two datasets. In this plot, the data collected from the round test specimens taken from the AdamsMill Bridge were plotted separate from the rectangular eyebar test specimens taken fromthe Bell Ford Bridge. The percent elongations from the round specimens were generallygreater than the average percent elongation <strong>of</strong> the historical data. All <strong>of</strong> the percentelongations <strong>of</strong> the round samples, except one, were greater than one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviationless than then mean <strong>of</strong> the percent elongations for the historical data.The percent elongation results for the rectangular specimens were considerablylower than for the round specimens. Most <strong>of</strong> the rectangular specimen percent elongationresults were less than one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation lower than the mean <strong>of</strong> the historical data,<strong>and</strong> a few were less than the second st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. As previously mentioned, it isbelieved that these low percent elongations are the result <strong>of</strong> damage that these specimensendured during the collapse <strong>of</strong> the Bell Ford Bridge. Since many bridge members enduredamage <strong>and</strong> are repaired <strong>and</strong> reused, the second st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation could be used as apossible minimum value <strong>of</strong> percent elongation for historic wrought iron.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!