VorderBruegge-face - NIST Visual Image Processing Group
VorderBruegge-face - NIST Visual Image Processing Group VorderBruegge-face - NIST Visual Image Processing Group
Photographic Comparisons:Principle of Individualization• The individualization of an item of evidenceis established by finding agreement ofcorresponding individual characteristics ofsuch number and significance as to precludethe possibility (or probability) of theirhaving occurred by mere coincidence, andestablishing that there are no inexplicabledifferences. (Adapted from Tuthill, 1994)
Class Characteristics inPhotographic Facial Comparisons• Characteristics shared by persons in agroup– Overall shape of face, chin, mouth, nose,eyes, ears …– General shape and characteristics of thehairline, facial hair, eyebrows, glasses...
- Page 1 and 2: Individualization of People from Im
- Page 3 and 4: CASES SUBMITTED• Terrorism• Hom
- Page 5 and 6: Forensic Photographic Examinations
- Page 7 and 8: Recognition vs. Identification?
- Page 9: Techniques of PhotographicFacial Co
- Page 13 and 14: Critical Factors in PhotographicFac
- Page 15: Visibility of Features inQuestioned
- Page 19 and 20: Facial Comparison - Mole on Neck
- Page 21 and 22: Points of Comparison - Forehead
- Page 28 and 29: FBI Facial ComparisonsGeneral Proce
- Page 30 and 31: FBI Facial ComparisonsBest Case Sce
- Page 32 and 33: Questioned Individual (photograph f
- Page 34 and 35: Side-byby-side comparison of X (fro
- Page 36 and 37: Side-byby-side comparison of X (fro
- Page 38 and 39: Reasons for Poor QualityImagery-Mul
- Page 41 and 42: Points of Comparison/Differentiatio
- Page 43 and 44: Long Range Challenge (for LawEnforc
- Page 45 and 46: Can new ANSI/NIST StandardAddresses
- Page 47 and 48: Proposed Level 50/51 Requirements
- Page 49: Other means of Personal Identificat
- Page 53: Left arm detail
- Page 56 and 57: Questioned Thumb
- Page 58 and 59: Side-byby-side ComparisonQuestioned
Photographic Comparisons:Principle of Individualization• The individualization of an item of evidenceis established by finding agreement ofcorresponding individual characteristics ofsuch number and significance as to precludethe possibility (or probability) of theirhaving occurred by mere coincidence, andestablishing that there are no inexplicabledifferences. (Adapted from Tuthill, 1994)
Change language