SR Vol 24 No 5, October 2006 - Nova Scotia Barristers' Society

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Business As Usual? Three lawyers weigh in on life after the capJohn Rafferty, Q.C.Burchell MacDougall, Truro, NSsuspect that my experience withI personal injury claims since theamendments to the Insurance Actand regulations is no different thanthat of any other personal injurylawyer. The number of claimantscontacting me for advice has dramaticallydropped. I inform thosewho do contact me about the newreality since tort reform and the legal issues surrounding thecourt challenge to the validity of the amendments. I tell themthat if the challenge to the legislation is not successful, thereis unlikely to be enough money recovered to justify the substantiallegal fees which may result from the management of allaspects of their claim. These people are then confronted withthe uncertainties of whether their injuries, some very serious,will nonetheless be “minor injuries” as defined in the Act and,if so, whether the Act and Regulations will withstand the legalchallenge currently being mounted. Typically, the tort claim thengoes into a “holding pattern” pending resolution of their injuriesand of the challenge.While claimants wait for their injuries to heal or reach a plateauwith varying amounts of chronic difficulties, they often have anumber of other legal issues which require immediate attention.They may need help with their Section B auto insurance claims forboth medical benefits and loss of income. They may be entitled toprivate disability insurance benefits, employment insurance, CanadaPension, Workers Compensation, or disability insurance onloans or other benefits. They often need help coordinating thesebenefits where there is an overlap, especially with Section B benefits;the rules for and interrelationship between these programscan be a maze.When a person injured in a car accident seeks my help, they typicallydo not have the financial ability to pay my regular hourly rateto assist with these ancillary issues. Even if they do, the legal costsare often greater than the amounts in dispute. In the past, adviceand legal services on all of these matters was generally providedwithout charging a direct fee, recognizing that our time would berecouped in the contingency fees charged for the tort claim. NowI undertake to provide a base level of service, without a realisticexpectation of payment, because the individuals are in need. I seethis as an access to justice issue.I believe the legislation has delivered a double whammy to bothpersonal injury litigators and the injured. For the lawyer, fees generatedfrom personal injury files have largely dried up. In addition,much of the new work is done pro bono or at greatly reduced rates.For the injured party, not only are they denied a recovery appropriateto their pain and suffering, but, because they often do notbother to seek legal help, they deal with the indirect consequencesof their injuries alone and without adequate information.Anna Marie ButlerWagner & Associates, Halifax, NSSince the cap legislation andregulations were introduced,practising motor vehicle personalinjury cases has become full ofuncertainty, but also challenge andopportunity.The uncertainty relates to our clientsand the advice we give them.It’s difficult to explain that we have to “wait and see” for theresults of the ultra vires constitutional application and/or definitioncases to evolve. We would all prefer to give more specificguidance and counsel than we can right now.I believe the legislation and regulations discriminate againstwomen, children, the elderly, persons with psychological injury,and generally those less fortunate. People who may fall underthe cap for damages are left waiting. The people whom the legislationmost affects are people that in the past persevered in spiteof barriers, and they continue to do so. They are very acceptingof the “wait and see” advice I am so uncomfortable giving. However,the fact is that the cap of $2,500 is so low, there really is verylittle for them to lose by waiting.Persons with severe injuries clearly outside the cap are facedwith allegations that their injury may fall under the cap despiteoverwhelming evidence to the contrary. Applications for partpaymentsand negotiation to resolve a severe injury case are oftenan exercise in futility.Our clients are the victims of careless drivers. The cap legislationre-victimizes the client with all degrees of injury for the benefitof big business profits. Every person who has been or might beinjured in a motor vehicle accident is at risk, which leaves everymember of the public vulnerable to the legislation.As lawyers we have an obligation to challenge this victimizationand imposition on the public’s right to make a claim. This obligationgives us all the opportunity and challenge we are trainedto take. Whether it is the constitutional challenge or arguing thata case is not “minor”, we are going to have to work, think, andchallenge ourselves more than we have in the past. Every barrierbrings opportunity, with this being no exception, as it’s exciting tohave the opportunity to stand up for people’s rights.Members of the Bar have stepped forward to take the challengefor the purpose of public interest. Barry Mason will be arguingthe Application regarding the ultra vires constitutional challenge.He deserves much credit for taking on such an immense task.Before the cap, getting lost in the daily grind of practising in thisarea could lead us to question whether or not what we do matteredor made a difference. When the Nova Scotia Government in-12 The Society Record
troduced the cap legislation, it forced many of us to go back to thebasic rationale behind the purpose of Tort law. When a person’srights are impinged and limited in the area in which you practice,the importance of that daily grind is highlighted.While there are detractors who will say lawyers are looking out fortheir own interests, (as impacted by the cap legislation) it helps topoint out that the detractors, their friends, family, and neighboursare all vulnerable to the legislation. No one is immune.Life after the cap, while full of uncertainty, has brought a renewedsense of purpose to the practice.Halifax’s BigBattleof theLawyerBandscap, I’ve received four.Oliver JansonBarrister & Solicitor, Digby, NSconduct a general practice inI Digby, Nova Scotia, part of whichincludes personal injury. Thereare approximately 10,000 peoplein the area and only a few lawyersstill practising personal injury law.Prior to the cap coming into effect,I would get a call approximatelyonce every six weeks, since theMost of the injuries would not warrant years of litigation. As istypical of a small town mindset, people would downplay theirinjury and it was often difficult to get an accurate sense of howtheir injury had affected them. Medical reports would often helpsubstantiate a claim.What most concerns me with respect to the cap is that if I wasgetting a call once every six weeks, and am now getting essentiallyzero, where have all the clients gone? It appears thatthey’re either seeking advice out of town or settling for the$2,500, when in fact their injury could be much worse, and warranta much larger settlement.The work that I used to receive as a result of personal injuryhas not been able to be made up in other areas. There are onlyso many property transactions and wills to execute in a smalltown. I have tried to become more efficient in my office andcut down on expenses. I have lowered my projected billings inorder to be able to budget for the upcoming fiscal years. At theend of the day though, the billings are not able to be recovered.It appears to me that the public have been done a disservicewith the cap as they are no longer pursuing legitimate personalinjury concerns and are instead settling for $2,500.In support ofMarch of Dimes Canada’s Conductive Education Program,with proceeds going directly to Haligonianchildren with physical disabilities.Come see bands fromStewart McKelvey Stirling Scales, McInnes Coopeand Cox Hanson O’Reilly Matheson as they compete forbragging rights as Halifax’s best legal band!Thursday, Oct. 26/06the Marquee Clubhalifax, NSDoors open at 6 pmTickets are $20 each and can be purchased at the door,through March of Dimes at 1-800-263-3463, ext. 7380,or through TD Bank branches throughout HRM.The evening includes great entertainment,great food, and a live auction!For more information on the event, contactChip Sutherland (444-8468) or Marc Belliveau (420-3343)Thanks to our sponsors:The Home ofRock n RollThe Home ofRock n RollOctober 2006 13
Page 3: C o n t e n t sVOLUME 24 | NO. 5 |
Page 6: TMThe new Quicklaw,Visit www.lexisn
Page 9 and 10: BRIEFSc a l l t o t h e b a r — s
Page 11: Personal Injury Lawyers -Business A
Page 15 and 16: treatment is discriminatory. It is
Page 17 and 18: October 2006 17
Page 19 and 20: to look after her and her child. De
Page 21 and 22: justice is too much. Canadian const
Page 23 and 24: maximum of $200,000 in uninsured/hi
Page 25 and 26: three years since November 2003 hav
Page 27 and 28: You bethejudgeQ:Earlier this year,
Page 29 and 30: Alberta Gets Toughon AdvertisingIn
Page 31 and 32: Great fund managers.Great low fees.

SR Vol 24 No 5, October 2006 - Nova Scotia Barristers' Society

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?