Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
Television, the Internet, and identity 391In short, in a changing world, experiencing the double process of globalizationand localization, collective identities are a stable point of reference, evenif we consider identity as something that is never finished, never being, alwaysbecoming. Moreover, in this context, we find the role of the mass media asactive creators of meaning, and the political aim of some collectivities with astrong cultural identity to consolidate their own media system with a doublestrategy: projecting their local culture as global and, at the same time, reinventingthemselves. This is the case of Euskal Telebista in the Basque Country,Radio Québec in Quebec, or Teilifís na Gaeilge in Ireland, among others.In order to proceed with a grounded analysis of my theoretical approach, Iwill use the development of Catalan Television as an exemplary case ofnational identity building in the field of communication.THE CASE OF CATALAN TELEVISIONThe political process of transformation in Spain, from the dictatorship towarddemocracy between 1975 and 1980, ended with the reform of the centralizedstate and the creation of the “State of the Autonomies,” which reorganized thestate into seventeen autonomous communities. These autonomous communitiesgained control over powers that were in the hands of the central stateduring the dictatorship. Among these powers, the autonomous communitieswon the right to own and operate their own independent television systems asa condition for the extension of democracy and, on the other hand, as a correctiveto the centralized, state-controlled media. In addition, in the so-called“Historical Communities” (Basque Country, Galicia, and Catalonia), thesesystems had the main purpose of strengthening cultural and collective identityand their own language, other than Spanish.During the first years of democracy, there was a long succession of deadlockedresolutions, compromises, and pacts among the major political parties to establishthe media policies to build a legal framework for autonomous television. At thesame time, these parties had serious difficulties in understanding the changes inthe structure of the centralist state. These difficulties provoked the autonomousparliaments of the Basque Country and Catalonia into approving their own televisionsystems, without approved legislation from the central state, and buildingtheir own parallel technical infrastructures as a result of a misunderstanding withcentral government, which owned the technical infrastructure of Spanish televisionand was reticent to lend them, fearing competition, but, more importantly, thefragmentation of the centralist national discourse. Basque Television (ETB) 2began broadcasting on January 1, 1983 and Catalan Television (TVC) inSeptember 1983. These actions constituted the first major institutional change inbroadcasting since the appearance of Spanish Television (TVE) in the 1950s.
392 Imma TubellaIn Galicia, autonomous television (TVG) appeared later than in Cataloniaand the Basque Country. Broadcasting began in July 1985. As the two otherchannels, Galician Television began as an instrument to normalize the use ofGalician culture and language in addition to serving as the sociocultural backbonefor community cohesion.The Third Channel Law came into force at the end of 1984, months afterthe Basques and Catalans had begun broadcasting, believing that their right tobroadcast was not dependent on the state and maintaining that their ownstatutes of autonomy, in combination with relevant clauses in the Constitution,protected their action in this area.By 1990, eleven autonomous broadcasting organizations were approved,seven of which had already begun broadcasting on a daily basis. In 1989, thesesystems agreed to merge into a national federation of autonomous broadcasters,known as FORTA, 3 creating a network of public broadcasters, a confederationmore than a federation with the aim of buying programs andnegotiating with major American production companies, such as Metro,Orion, and Columbia, jointly rather than individually. Participating in FORTAare autonomous systems from the Basque Country, Catalonia, Andalusia,Galicia, Valencia, Madrid, Castilla la Mancha, and Murcia.Autonomous television broke the monopoly of television in Spain and ranas a duopoly for several years before the emergence of private television in1990. By the late 1980s, with only three autonomous TV networks and onestate-based network (commercial TV had not yet started) the total investmentin TV advertising had been pushed up to more than 1,000 percent of investmentin 1975. In the first few months, the audiences of these autonomousnetworks reached 50 percent. The transition to democracy in Spain must beunderstood in relation to the media transition that helped stage the difficultchanges in state structure and the debate on the role of media; in particular, therole of television helped social cohesion and the construction of cultural andcollective identity.To understand the present media space and the building of national publicspheres in Europe, to understand the quest for a European identity and howpublic television is positioned within the global commercial culture, we haveto take into consideration this kind of identity building through the media. Forthis purpose, the autonomous television networks broadcasting in the Spanishstate provide a clear case study. In this chapter, therefore, I am going to lookin depth at the case of Catalan Television.Catalan Television (TVC) is a public enterprise created on September 11,1983 to run and operate the television channels of the Catalan BroadcastingCorporation. Since its inception, TVC has sought to reflect the identity of acountry and has helped to build and rebuild this identity.TVC broadcasts in the Catalan language with a global vision. It has two
- Page 363 and 364: 342 Jeffrey S. JurisFollowing Fredr
- Page 365 and 366: 344 Jeffrey S. Jurisactions and cou
- Page 367 and 368: 346 Jeffrey S. Juristime. 13 Some h
- Page 369 and 370: 348 Jeffrey S. JurisZapatistas were
- Page 371 and 372: 350 Jeffrey S. Juriscollectives aga
- Page 373 and 374: 352 Jeffrey S. JurisVisibly impassi
- Page 375 and 376: 354 Jeffrey S. Juriselements. Colin
- Page 377 and 378: 356 Jeffrey S. Jurisorganizations.
- Page 379 and 380: 358 Jeffrey S. JurisNOTES1. Moving
- Page 381 and 382: 360 Jeffrey S. JurisMRG,’ which w
- Page 383 and 384: 362 Jeffrey S. JurisPolanyi, Karl (
- Page 385 and 386: 364 Araba Sey and Manuel CastellsIn
- Page 387 and 388: 366 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsre
- Page 389 and 390: 368 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsci
- Page 391 and 392: 370 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellssw
- Page 393 and 394: 372 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellspa
- Page 395 and 396: 374 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellssu
- Page 397 and 398: 376 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsch
- Page 399 and 400: 378 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsso
- Page 401 and 402: 380 Araba Sey and Manuel CastellsCo
- Page 404: PART VIIThe culture of the network
- Page 407 and 408: 386 Imma Tubellacultural and sociol
- Page 409 and 410: 388 Imma Tubellaand through symboli
- Page 411: 390 Imma TubellaStates. During the
- Page 415 and 416: 394 Imma Tubellarooms, including fi
- Page 417 and 418: 396 Imma Tubellaunderstand the choi
- Page 419 and 420: 398 Imma Tubellainteraction which i
- Page 421 and 422: 400 Imma TubellaFerguson, M. (1995)
- Page 423 and 424: 18. Globalization, identity, and te
- Page 425 and 426: 404 Anshu ChatterjeeIndian entrepre
- Page 427 and 428: 406 Anshu ChatterjeeThese enterpris
- Page 429 and 430: 408 Anshu Chatterjeerestricted area
- Page 431 and 432: 410 Anshu Chatterjeepenetration rat
- Page 433 and 434: 412 Anshu Chatterjeeproduced instit
- Page 435 and 436: 414 Anshu ChatterjeePunjabi TV face
- Page 437 and 438: 416 Anshu Chatterjeedecisions. The
- Page 439 and 440: 418 Anshu ChatterjeeNOTES1. For mor
- Page 441 and 442: 19. The hacker ethic as the culture
- Page 443 and 444: 422 Pekka Himanenthe informational
- Page 445 and 446: 424 Pekka Himanenone of the founder
- Page 447 and 448: 426 Pekka Himanena work culture in
- Page 449 and 450: 428 Pekka Himanenhype in which the
- Page 451 and 452: 430 Pekka HimanenWithout renewing t
- Page 453 and 454: Afterword: an historian’s view on
- Page 455 and 456: 434 Rosalind Williamsdoes it mean t
- Page 457 and 458: 436 Rosalind Williamsindustrial soc
- Page 459 and 460: 438 Rosalind Williamsgovernance str
- Page 461 and 462: 440 Rosalind Williamsspeech deliver
392 Imma TubellaIn Galicia, autonomous television (TVG) appeared later than in Cataloniaand the Basque Country. Broadcasting began in July 1985. As the two otherchannels, Galician Television began as an instrument to normalize the use ofGalician culture and langua<strong>ge</strong> in addition to serving as the sociocultural backbonefor community cohesion.The Third Channel Law came into force at the end of 1984, months afterthe Basques and Catalans had begun broadcasting, believing that their right tobroadcast was not dependent on the state and maintaining that their ownstatutes of autonomy, in combination with relevant clauses in the Constitution,protected their action in this area.By 1990, eleven autonomous broadcasting organizations were approved,seven of which had already begun broadcasting on a daily basis. In 1989, thesesystems agreed to mer<strong>ge</strong> into a national federation of autonomous broadcasters,known as FORTA, 3 creating a network of public broadcasters, a confederationmore than a federation with the aim of buying programs andnegotiating with major American production companies, such as Metro,Orion, and Columbia, jointly rather than individually. Participating in FORTAare autonomous systems from the Basque Country, Catalonia, Andalusia,Galicia, Valencia, Madrid, Castilla la Mancha, and Murcia.Autonomous television broke the monopoly of television in Spain and ranas a duopoly for several years before the emer<strong>ge</strong>nce of private television in1990. By the late 1980s, with only three autonomous TV networks and onestate-based network (commercial TV had not yet started) the total investmentin TV advertising had been pushed up to more than 1,000 percent of investmentin 1975. In the first few months, the audiences of these autonomousnetworks reached 50 percent. The transition to democracy in Spain must beunderstood in relation to the media transition that helped sta<strong>ge</strong> the difficultchan<strong>ge</strong>s in state structure and the debate on the role of media; in particular, therole of television helped social cohesion and the construction of cultural andcollective identity.To understand the present media space and the building of national publicspheres in Europe, to understand the quest for a European identity and howpublic television is positioned within the global commercial culture, we haveto take into consideration this kind of identity building through the media. Forthis purpose, the autonomous television networks broadcasting in the Spanishstate provide a clear case study. In this chapter, therefore, I am going to lookin depth at the case of Catalan Television.Catalan Television (TVC) is a public enterprise created on September 11,1983 to run and operate the television channels of the Catalan BroadcastingCorporation. Since its inception, TVC has sought to reflect the identity of acountry and has helped to build and rebuild this identity.TVC broadcasts in the Catalan langua<strong>ge</strong> with a global vision. It has two