Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
Networked social movements 355We organized ourselves as nodes, using the nomenclature of the Internet. It wascompletely new because we were thinking in network terms. The nodes were thespaces where information was produced and made public, the physical embodimentof the Internet, what we might call affinity groups today. We took the idea, not of aplatform – we didn’t want to work as a platform – but rather of a network. (interview,June 12, 2002)Moreover, the broader political goal was not just abolishing the external debt,but rather expanding the Network itself, along with its directly democraticmodus operandi, as an RCADE document explains, “The Network is a tool forcreating social fabric, and we do this in our local contexts . . . Participatorydemocracy is not only a transversal theme in our work; it constitutes our modelof . . . operation.” 28 This network ideal emerged among many activist sectorsaround the Spanish state during the latter half of the 1990s, ultimately becomingan important part of the broader ethos within global justice movements, asan MRG activist explained: “For me, the twenty-first century, with thediscourse of postmodernity, people are always talking about the ‘network ofnetworks of networks,’ but for me building these networks represents theworld we want to create” (interview, June 11, 2002). She went on to define herideal world as composed of “small, self-organized and self-managed communities,coordinated among them on a worldwide scale.” When asked aboutnetworks, another global justice activist and squatter responded: “The revolutionis also about process; the way we do things … is also an alternative tocapitalism, no?” (interview, June 2, 2002). Specifically contrasting traditionalpolitics with the network ideal, another MRG-based activist describednetworks as the best way to “balance freedom with coordination, autonomywith collective work, self-organization with effectiveness” (interview, May30, 2002). Networking tools – such as Indymedia, electronic distribution lists,interactive web pages, the European Social Consulta, or the BarcelonaInfospace – are thus specifically designed to help people “construct networksat whatever rhythm possible.”CONCLUSION: BUILDING LABORATORIES FORDEMOCRACYIn the process of using new networking technologies and practices to communicate,coordinate, and (self-)organize, global justice activists are building neworganizational forms that are network-based, and which express and reflect thenetwork as an emerging political and cultural ideal. Eric Raymond (1999: 224)has characterized a popular folk theorem among software engineers in thefollowing terms: “Organizations which design systems are constrained toproduce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these
356 Jeffrey S. Jurisorganizations.” There is indeed something to this. Emerging network normsand forms within global justice movements (and within the academy as well)thus not only mirror one another, they also reflect underlying technologicaltransformations mediated by concrete human practice, pointing to a muchbroader dialectic among cultural norms, organizational forms, and technologicalchange.Global justice movements are extremely diverse phenomena. While someMarxist and social democratic sectors promote a return to the nation-state asthe locus for democratic control over the global economy, others support aninternationalist “globalization from below” (Brecher et al., 2000), wheretransnational movements represent an emerging global civil society. Activistswithin more libertarian networks, however, increasingly view social movementsas concrete political alternatives in and of themselves. Many ecologists,squatters, and militant anti-capitalists emphasize the local sphere, while othersshare a broad vision for a decentralized, yet globally coordinated network ofautonomous, self-managed communities. What brings all these differentvisions together involves a commitment to help people establish democraticcontrol over their daily lives. Alberto Melucci (1989: 75–6) argues that socialmovements are signs that announce to society the existence of a conflict andrender power visible. In this sense, global justice movements highlight theincreasing social and economic polarization, environmental devastation, andcultural domination that activists associate with the current regime of corporateglobalization, where the market has become disembedded from society(Polanyi, 1957).Moving from resistance toward alternative political projects often generatesheated micro-political struggles among activists, which largely revolvearound two distinct forms of practicing democracy: one based on politicalrepresentation within permanent structures and another rooted in flexible coordinationand direct participation through decentralized network formations.Political parties, unions, and formal organizations of civil society operateaccording to a representative logic, where social movements function as lobbygroups, applying grassroots pressure to institutional actors, who ultimatelyprocess and implement political proposals. On this view, movements, parties,and unions should work together, each filling distinct, yet complementaryroles, as a labor delegate from Barcelona explained: “Social movements carryout grassroots work, raising awareness among citizens, but they cannot substitutefor political parties … Each one has to know what role they play, and inwhich social and political space they operate” (interview, June 12, 2002).On the other hand, radical network-based movements have articulated amore sweeping political project: transcending both the market and the state.During a debate between Catalan activists and their more institutional counterpartsin May 2002, for example, an activist from XCADE (the Catalan
- Page 326 and 327: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 328 and 329: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 330 and 331: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 332 and 333: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 334 and 335: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 336 and 337: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 338 and 339: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 340 and 341: 14. Narrowing the digital divide: t
- Page 342 and 343: The US community technology movemen
- Page 344 and 345: The US community technology movemen
- Page 346 and 347: The US community technology movemen
- Page 348 and 349: community issues, access advanced t
- Page 350 and 351: The US community technology movemen
- Page 352 and 353: The US community technology movemen
- Page 354 and 355: The US community technology movemen
- Page 356 and 357: The US community technology movemen
- Page 358 and 359: The US community technology movemen
- Page 360: PART VINetworked social movements a
- Page 363 and 364: 342 Jeffrey S. JurisFollowing Fredr
- Page 365 and 366: 344 Jeffrey S. Jurisactions and cou
- Page 367 and 368: 346 Jeffrey S. Juristime. 13 Some h
- Page 369 and 370: 348 Jeffrey S. JurisZapatistas were
- Page 371 and 372: 350 Jeffrey S. Juriscollectives aga
- Page 373 and 374: 352 Jeffrey S. JurisVisibly impassi
- Page 375: 354 Jeffrey S. Juriselements. Colin
- Page 379 and 380: 358 Jeffrey S. JurisNOTES1. Moving
- Page 381 and 382: 360 Jeffrey S. JurisMRG,’ which w
- Page 383 and 384: 362 Jeffrey S. JurisPolanyi, Karl (
- Page 385 and 386: 364 Araba Sey and Manuel CastellsIn
- Page 387 and 388: 366 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsre
- Page 389 and 390: 368 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsci
- Page 391 and 392: 370 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellssw
- Page 393 and 394: 372 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellspa
- Page 395 and 396: 374 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellssu
- Page 397 and 398: 376 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsch
- Page 399 and 400: 378 Araba Sey and Manuel Castellsso
- Page 401 and 402: 380 Araba Sey and Manuel CastellsCo
- Page 404: PART VIIThe culture of the network
- Page 407 and 408: 386 Imma Tubellacultural and sociol
- Page 409 and 410: 388 Imma Tubellaand through symboli
- Page 411 and 412: 390 Imma TubellaStates. During the
- Page 413 and 414: 392 Imma TubellaIn Galicia, autonom
- Page 415 and 416: 394 Imma Tubellarooms, including fi
- Page 417 and 418: 396 Imma Tubellaunderstand the choi
- Page 419 and 420: 398 Imma Tubellainteraction which i
- Page 421 and 422: 400 Imma TubellaFerguson, M. (1995)
- Page 423 and 424: 18. Globalization, identity, and te
- Page 425 and 426: 404 Anshu ChatterjeeIndian entrepre
Networked social movements 355We organized ourselves as nodes, using the nomenclature of the Internet. It wascompletely new because we were thinking in network terms. The nodes were thespaces where information was produced and made public, the physical embodimentof the Internet, what we might call affinity groups today. We took the idea, not of aplatform – we didn’t want to work as a platform – but rather of a network. (interview,June 12, 2002)Moreover, the broader political goal was not just abolishing the external debt,but rather expanding the Network itself, along with its directly democraticmodus operandi, as an RCADE document explains, “The Network is a tool forcreating social fabric, and we do this in our local contexts . . . Participatorydemocracy is not only a transversal theme in our work; it constitutes our modelof . . . operation.” 28 This network ideal emer<strong>ge</strong>d among many activist sectorsaround the Spanish state during the latter half of the 1990s, ultimately becomingan important part of the broader ethos within global justice movements, asan MRG activist explained: “For me, the twenty-first century, with thediscourse of postmodernity, people are always talking about the ‘network ofnetworks of networks,’ but for me building these networks represents theworld we want to create” (interview, June 11, 2002). She went on to define herideal world as composed of “small, self-organized and self-mana<strong>ge</strong>d communities,coordinated among them on a worldwide scale.” When asked aboutnetworks, another global justice activist and squatter responded: “The revolutionis also about process; the way we do things … is also an alternative tocapitalism, no?” (interview, June 2, 2002). Specifically contrasting traditionalpolitics with the network ideal, another MRG-based activist describednetworks as the best way to “balance freedom with coordination, autonomywith collective work, self-organization with effectiveness” (interview, May30, 2002). Networking tools – such as Indymedia, electronic distribution lists,interactive web pa<strong>ge</strong>s, the European Social Consulta, or the BarcelonaInfospace – are thus specifically designed to help people “construct networksat whatever rhythm possible.”CONCLUSION: BUILDING LABORATORIES FORDEMOCRACYIn the process of using new networking technologies and practices to communicate,coordinate, and (self-)organize, global justice activists are building neworganizational forms that are network-based, and which express and reflect thenetwork as an emerging political and cultural ideal. Eric Raymond (1999: 224)has characterized a popular folk theorem among software engineers in thefollowing terms: “Organizations which design systems are constrained toproduce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these