10.07.2015 Views

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

354 Jeffrey S. Juriselements. Colin Ward, a contemporary British anarchist, specifically viewsanarchist federations as decentralized networks, explaining that communesand syndicates would “federate to<strong>ge</strong>ther not like the stones of a pyramid wherethe big<strong>ge</strong>st burden is borne by the lowest layer, but like the links of a network,the network of autonomous groups” (1973: 26). In many ways, anarchismresembles the decentered networking logic of informational capitalism, asWard (1973: 58) further explains: “The anarchist conclusion is that every kindof human activity should begin from what is local and immediate, should linkin a network with no center and no directing a<strong>ge</strong>ncy, hiving off new cells asthe original ones grow.” From this vanta<strong>ge</strong> point, it is not surprising that anarchism,or left-libertarianism more <strong>ge</strong>nerally, would become the prevailin<strong>ge</strong>thos of opposition within an a<strong>ge</strong> characterized by decentralized networkforms. The “autopoietic” or self-produced network (see Luhmann, 1990) thusbecomes a powerful model, reflecting an open-source development logic,based on a multitude of autonomous components coordinating and interactingwithout mediating structure or central command.Kropotkin (1905) similarly argued that in a society without government,social order and harmony would be produced through “an ever-changingadjustment and readjustment of equilibrium between the multitudes of forcesand influences” (cited in Ward, 1973: 52). Whereas neoliberalism revolvesaround the ideal of the self-regulating market, anarchism does away withmediation alto<strong>ge</strong>ther, positing completely self-mana<strong>ge</strong>d, self-regulatingnetworks. The important point, though, is not whether networks are autopoieticin a strict sense, but, rather, that the self-<strong>ge</strong>nerating network becomes abroader cultural and political model for organizing society based on horizontalconnectedness, direct democracy, and coordination through autonomy anddiversity – among hackers, anarchists, and more radical global justice activistsalike. 27This emerging network ideal was particularly pronounced among theCatalan and Spanish activists I worked with during my field research inBarcelona. For example, the Citizens Network to Abolish the External Debt(RCADE), which helped give rise to and continued to work alongside theMRG, self-consciously employed the terminology of computer networks tocharacterize its organizational structure. The “Network,” as it is popularlyknown, is thus composed of various local, regional, and statewide “nodes.”The organizational and political base of the Network is constituted by localnodes, which are “self-defined, self-mana<strong>ge</strong>d and self-organized spaces.”Broader coordination is carried out through periodic meetings of regional andstatewide nodes, as well as annual gatherings. The Network was specificallyfor<strong>ge</strong>d to organize a statewide consultation to ask citizens if they were in favorof abolishing the external debt owed by developing nations to the Spanishgovernment. As one activist explained:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!