Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge

10.07.2015 Views

Networked social movements 351a decentralized network of PGA “Infopoints” in order to give more visibilityto the network and promote the struggles, activities, and values of participatingcollectives.Within movements such as the MRG or PGA, the cultural logic ofnetworking has given rise to what grassroots activists in Barcelona call the“new way of doing politics.” By this they mean precisely those networkbasedforms of political organization and practice based on non-hierarchicalstructures, horizontal coordination among autonomous groups, open access,direct participation, consensus-based decision-making, and the ideal of thefree and open circulation of information (although this is not alwaysconformed to in practice). While the command-oriented logic of traditionalparties and unions is based on recruiting new members, developing unitarystrategies, political representation through vertical structures, and the pursuitof political hegemony, network-based politics involves the creation of broadumbrella spaces, where diverse organizations, collectives, and networksconverge around a few common hallmarks, while preserving their autonomyand identity-based specificity. Rather than recruitment, the objectivebecomes horizontal expansion and enhanced “connectivity” through articulatingdiverse movements within flexible, decentralized information structuresthat allow for maximal coordination and communication. Guided bythis networking logic, key activists become relayers and exchangers, generatingconcrete practices involving the reception, interpretation, and relayingof information out to the diverse nodes within and among alternative movementnetworks.Following Diane Nelson (1999), who employs the term “Maya-hacker” tocharacterize Mayan activists engaged in cultural activism and transnationalnetworking, global justice activists can be similarly viewed as “activisthackers,”generating innovative networking practices guided by the culturallogic of networking. Like computer hackers, activist-hackers receive,combine, and recombine cultural codes, in this case, political signifiers,freely sharing and circulating information about projects, mobilizations,strategies, tactics, and ideas through global communication networks. Aswith computer hackers, activist-hackers seek to enhance the connectivity ofsocial movements, widening and diversifying networks through the opensharing and circulation of information. For example, a member of the PGAnetwork support group, the son of Chilean exiles who grew up in Germanynear the French border, stressed the value of “proficiency in multiplelanguages” and “cultural flexibility” for contributing to the group, signalingboth the importance of recombining codes and connecting people throughdiversity and difference. In addition, a Barcelona-based activist, widelyrecognized as a key social relayer and exchanger, developed a system forinstantly sending messages to hundreds of list-serves around the world.

352 Jeffrey S. JurisVisibly impassioned, he once remarked, “Now I can reach thousands ofactivists at the touch of a button every time we want to communicate somethingimportant!”This networking logic is unevenly distributed within global justice movements,however, and often generates fierce resistance. Network-based formsand practices are more prevalent among certain sectors, while the discourseof open networking can also serve to conceal other forms of domination andexclusion based on unequal access to communication technologies or controlof information flows. Indeed, these issues often emerge as crucial points ofcontention among activists. As a grassroots activist from India commentedin Porto Alegre: “It is not enough to talk about networks, we also have to talkabout democracy and the internal distribution of power within them.” Agiven cultural logic thus always exists in dynamic tension with othercompeting logics, and even when specific cultural practices become dominantwithin a concrete social space, they never achieve complete hegemony.What many observers view as a single, unified global justice movement isactually a congeries of competing, yet sometimes overlapping, social movementnetworks that differ according to issue addressed, political subjectivity,ideological framework, political culture, and organizational logic.Social movements are complex cultural fields shot through with internaldifferentiation and contestation. Struggles within and among different movementnetworks largely shape the way specific networks are produced, howthey develop, and how they relate to one another within broader socialmovement fields. Cultural struggles surrounding ideology (anti-globalizationversus anti-capitalism), strategies (summit hopping versus sustainedorganizing), tactics (violence versus non-violence), as well as organizationalform and decision-making (structure versus non-structure, consensus versusvoting) – what I call the cultural politics of networking – have becomeenduring features of the global justice landscape. Indeed, the ubiquity ofmovement-related debates and discussions within physical and onlineforums, including the incessant production and circulation of documents,reflections, editorials, and calls to action, reflects the highly “reflexive”nature of contemporary social movement networks (see Giddens, 1991;Beck et al., 1994). Some of the most intense conflicts revolve around politicalculture and organizational form. Newer movements, such as the MRGand PGA, are characterized by a networking logic, while more traditionalmovements involve command logics and vertical structures, such as politicalparties and trade unions. Discrepant logics often lead activists into heatedstruggles within the broad umbrella spaces characteristic of global justicemovements, such as the “unitary” campaigns against the World Bank or theEuropean Union in Barcelona or the World Social Forum process at local,regional, and transnational scales.

Networked social movements 351a decentralized network of PGA “Infopoints” in order to give more visibilityto the network and promote the struggles, activities, and values of participatingcollectives.Within movements such as the MRG or PGA, the cultural logic ofnetworking has given rise to what grassroots activists in Barcelona call the“new way of doing politics.” By this they mean precisely those networkbasedforms of political organization and practice based on non-hierarchicalstructures, horizontal coordination among autonomous groups, open access,direct participation, consensus-based decision-making, and the ideal of thefree and open circulation of information (although this is not alwaysconformed to in practice). While the command-oriented logic of traditionalparties and unions is based on recruiting new members, developing unitarystrategies, political representation through vertical structures, and the pursuitof political he<strong>ge</strong>mony, network-based politics involves the creation of broadumbrella spaces, where diverse organizations, collectives, and networksconver<strong>ge</strong> around a few common hallmarks, while preserving their autonomyand identity-based specificity. Rather than recruitment, the objectivebecomes horizontal expansion and enhanced “connectivity” through articulatingdiverse movements within flexible, decentralized information structuresthat allow for maximal coordination and communication. Guided bythis networking logic, key activists become relayers and exchan<strong>ge</strong>rs, <strong>ge</strong>neratingconcrete practices involving the reception, interpretation, and relayingof information out to the diverse nodes within and among alternative movementnetworks.Following Diane Nelson (1999), who employs the term “Maya-hacker” tocharacterize Mayan activists enga<strong>ge</strong>d in cultural activism and transnationalnetworking, global justice activists can be similarly viewed as “activisthackers,”<strong>ge</strong>nerating innovative networking practices guided by the culturallogic of networking. Like computer hackers, activist-hackers receive,combine, and recombine cultural codes, in this case, political signifiers,freely sharing and circulating information about projects, mobilizations,strategies, tactics, and ideas through global communication networks. Aswith computer hackers, activist-hackers seek to enhance the connectivity ofsocial movements, widening and diversifying networks through the opensharing and circulation of information. For example, a member of the PGAnetwork support group, the son of Chilean exiles who grew up in Germanynear the French border, stressed the value of “proficiency in multiplelangua<strong>ge</strong>s” and “cultural flexibility” for contributing to the group, signalingboth the importance of recombining codes and connecting people throughdiversity and difference. In addition, a Barcelona-based activist, widelyrecognized as a key social relayer and exchan<strong>ge</strong>r, developed a system forinstantly sending messa<strong>ge</strong>s to hundreds of list-serves around the world.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!