Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
• the courses are delivered globally, often with an international partner,and in two languages;• the program is available almost entirely online;• the students themselves contribute extensively to the knowledge base,through collaborative online discussion;• there is no research dissertation, but the programs are often projectbased,drawing on the experience of diverse professionals workingcollaboratively online;• the courses are entirely self-funded through tuition fees, allowing theuniversity to hire additional tenured faculty;• the programs are self-sustainable because they meet a market demand.Lastly, in a corporate training environment, e-learning may be used for “justin-time”learning, allowing employees to develop skills as and when they needthem. A typical example would be an employee wishing to develop a graphfrom an Excel data spreadsheet for a company presentation. The company hasarranged with an external e-learning company access for its employees toshort modules of training for Excel. Using a pre-assigned identification andpassword, the employee goes online and chooses a module on creating graphs,and has on-demand and continuous access to that module until mastery of thetask is achieved.Stability and Changee-learning in post-secondary education 283Returning, then, to the questions posed at the beginning of this section, e-learning in general does not change the fundamental processes of learning.Students need to read, observe, think, discuss, practice, receive feedback, beassessed, and accredited. These requirements are not changed by e-learning.Furthermore, e-learning does not really transform the traditional methods offace-to-face teaching. Indeed, face-to-face methods transfer very easily totechnology. Information can be transmitted over the web probably more effectivelyand just as easily as in a lecture theater. Online discussion forums replicatemost of the features of face-to-face seminars, although there are somelosses, such as visual cues, and some gains, such as the opportunity for reflectionbefore participating. Problem-based learning and project work can be justas easily replicated online as in class, with probably greater access toresources. Even a great deal of laboratory work can be simulated, at a cost.In this sense, then, I do not share the view of Harasim et al. (1995) or Peters(2002) when they argue that e-learning is a “paradigm shift.” Rather, it is oldwine in new bottles, at least at present. But one needs to be careful here.Developments in computer-based expert systems, simulations, learningobjects, virtual reality, and the vast resources available over the Internet, are
284 Tony Bateslikely to result in a greater emphasis on methods that are not so prevalent inface-to-face teaching, and may lead eventually to radically new formats forteaching.As a result, there is already a shift to more project work and problem-basedlearning, the creation by students of multimedia projects and assignments, andmore student choice in learning and the curriculum, through e-learning.Radically different ways of structuring learning materials may be developed tosupport new forms of learning, and innovative teachers will discover andcreate new methods of teaching that better exploit the potential of e-learning.E-learning opens up new markets for higher education; indeed, it is meetingneeds in professional continuing education that have otherwise been largelyignored by universities. Nevertheless, the old methods have well served thebasic processes of learning for over 800 years. It would be surprising if theydisappeared entirely from e-learning applications, although they may becontinuously adapted as the technology changes.Where e-learning is having an effect is by facilitating and making moreefficient or more effective the learning process. Electronic learning no moreautomates learning than traditional large classes and multiple-choice testing.What it can do, though, is to shift the balance of work from teacher to student.By providing self-controlled activities, student time on task can be increased.Electronic learning can provide more opportunities for practice, and moreflexible access to a wider range of materials.Electronic learning also enables teachers to offer alternative approaches tolearning that suit the needs of different kinds of learners. It can offer access toresources that would not otherwise be available in a traditional classroom.Thus while not changing the fundamental ways in which students learn, e-learning can add value to the process of teaching and learning, by creatingricher or more authentic learning environments, and by providing moreoptions to meet individual needs in learning.ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUESWhere e-learning can lead to fundamental change in education is in the organizationof teaching. Electronic learning provides teachers and students withopportunities to organize teaching and learning in radically different ways.Neither teachers nor students have to be (always) present in the classroom.They can be freed from the requirement to be at a specific place at a specifictime in order to teach or to study. Electronic learning allows for access tomaterials that would otherwise not be available in a classroom, and allowsteachers and students to structure learning materials in a variety of ways. Itenables different preferences for learning to be more easily accommodated,
- Page 253 and 254: 232 Keith N. HamptonSouthern Califo
- Page 255 and 256: 234 Manuel Castells et al.this stud
- Page 257 and 258: 236 Manuel Castells et al.On the ot
- Page 259 and 260: 238 Manuel Castells et al.friends a
- Page 261 and 262: 240 Manuel Castells et al.Table 10.
- Page 263 and 264: 242 Manuel Castells et al.way behin
- Page 265 and 266: 244 Manuel Castells et al.by radio.
- Page 267 and 268: 246 Manuel Castells et al.The six t
- Page 269 and 270: 248 Manuel Castells et al.that belo
- Page 271 and 272: 250 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 273 and 274: 252 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 275 and 276: 254 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 277 and 278: 256 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 279 and 280: 258 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 281 and 282: 260 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 283 and 284: Table 11.5Logistic coefficients fro
- Page 285 and 286: 264 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 287 and 288: 266 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 289 and 290: 268 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 292 and 293: 12. The promise and the myths ofe-l
- Page 294 and 295: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 296 and 297: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 298 and 299: Public Dual-mode Institutionse-lear
- Page 300 and 301: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 302 and 303: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 306 and 307: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 308 and 309: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 310 and 311: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 312 and 313: e-learning in post-secondary educat
- Page 314 and 315: 13. e-health networks and socialtra
- Page 316 and 317: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 318 and 319: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 320 and 321: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 322 and 323: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 324 and 325: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 326 and 327: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 328 and 329: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 330 and 331: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 332 and 333: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 334 and 335: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 336 and 337: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 338 and 339: e-health networks and social transf
- Page 340 and 341: 14. Narrowing the digital divide: t
- Page 342 and 343: The US community technology movemen
- Page 344 and 345: The US community technology movemen
- Page 346 and 347: The US community technology movemen
- Page 348 and 349: community issues, access advanced t
- Page 350 and 351: The US community technology movemen
- Page 352 and 353: The US community technology movemen
284 Tony Bateslikely to result in a greater emphasis on methods that are not so prevalent inface-to-face teaching, and may lead eventually to radically new formats forteaching.As a result, there is already a shift to more project work and problem-basedlearning, the creation by students of multimedia projects and assignments, andmore student choice in learning and the curriculum, through e-learning.Radically different ways of structuring learning materials may be developed tosupport new forms of learning, and innovative teachers will discover andcreate new methods of teaching that better exploit the potential of e-learning.E-learning opens up new markets for higher education; indeed, it is meetingneeds in professional continuing education that have otherwise been lar<strong>ge</strong>lyignored by universities. Nevertheless, the old methods have well served thebasic processes of learning for over 800 years. It would be surprising if theydisappeared entirely from e-learning applications, although they may becontinuously adapted as the technology chan<strong>ge</strong>s.Where e-learning is having an effect is by facilitating and making moreefficient or more effective the learning process. Electronic learning no moreautomates learning than traditional lar<strong>ge</strong> classes and multiple-choice testing.What it can do, though, is to shift the balance of work from teacher to student.By providing self-controlled activities, student time on task can be increased.Electronic learning can provide more opportunities for practice, and moreflexible access to a wider ran<strong>ge</strong> of materials.Electronic learning also enables teachers to offer alternative approaches tolearning that suit the needs of different kinds of learners. It can offer access toresources that would not otherwise be available in a traditional classroom.Thus while not changing the fundamental ways in which students learn, e-learning can add value to the process of teaching and learning, by creatingricher or more authentic learning environments, and by providing moreoptions to meet individual needs in learning.ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUESWhere e-learning can lead to fundamental chan<strong>ge</strong> in education is in the organizationof teaching. Electronic learning provides teachers and students withopportunities to organize teaching and learning in radically different ways.Neither teachers nor students have to be (always) present in the classroom.They can be freed from the requirement to be at a specific place at a specifictime in order to teach or to study. Electronic learning allows for access tomaterials that would otherwise not be available in a classroom, and allowsteachers and students to structure learning materials in a variety of ways. Itenables different preferences for learning to be more easily accommodated,