Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
information he receives will be seconds behind at best. That outdated informationis a representation of a temporal market reality that no longer exists.Social networks complicate this understanding of the market. Thesenetworks stretch the market over time. They create agreements between individualsabout the shape of the market, even though the CBOT defines themarket as a phenomenon confined to the daily trade. The formation of adefined social space within the pit creates problems for the designers andmanagers who are responsible for creating and maintaining an “efficient”marketplace. The social understandings of time and space in the market underminethe technological design of the market. The competing notions of spaceand time cannot be reconciled easily.SplinteringTechnology in financial networks 203Despite the temporal and spatial centrality of the pit, the physical proximity oftraders creates splintering. Strategies for profit-making in the pit result in thespatial and social fragmentation of the market. The largest pit at the CBOTholds 600 traders. In an arena of such vast size, not all traders are available ata single time. Traders can use their own discretion when identifying their tradingpartners. Traders use this judgment to create protected spaces of exchange,or neighborhoods. In these enclaves, traders of similar skills and risk-takingtastes gather in a single area of the pit to support each other’s labor. Brokersand individual traders of great influence encourage younger traders who showpromise to stand close to them in the pit. This proximity allows the influentialspeculator to do business with the traders of his choice, establishing centers ofprofitability within the supposedly open marketplace. 11 Although the pit wascreated to centralize and unify the market, the social network of the pit isarranged in clusters that trade more with one another and less with thoseoutside their “neighborhood.”The stepped structure of the pit also creates a problem for traders who practicea technique called spreading between contracts. These speculators – alsocalled yield-curve traders – exploit fluctuations in the relationship betweenprices in the 30, 10, and 5-year treasury futures. For a spreader based primarilyin the 10-year pit the key profit is to have instant access to trade in the 5-year notes. Spreaders dominate an area where these traders have anuninterrupted view of the 5-year pit. The pit is also divided into areas accordingto the expiration month of the contract. Traders who deal in “front month”contracts – the futures contract that will expire next – gather in one area of thepit. Traders who trade the middle and back month contracts gather in distinctareas. The shape of the pit and the arrangement of pits on the trading floorcondition the physical arrangement of the social network of traders.CBOT dealers have been plying their trade in pits for 155 years. Until
204 Caitlin Zaloomrecently, the logic of the trading nexus has been unchallenged. Changes to thepit technology have focused on the delivery of information to the pit and thedistribution of commodity prices that are made there. From chalkboards andtelegraphs to telephone, digital order books, and electronic screens, informationtechnology has been used to augment the trading nexus.FROM NEXUS TO NETWORKAfter a century and a half of dominance, the pit is now giving way to onlineforms of trading. Digital markets are obviating the CBOT nexus by establishingelectronic networks that stretch over the globe. This new market form linksdispersed traders into a unified, but decentralized, market. This is not,however, a simple reproduction or rationalization of the marketplace. Thesedigital platforms create new orientations to space and time that define themarket environment and the information available to traders. Where the tradingpit was designed to unify the market in space and time, electronic futurestrading creates a technological network of traders that share time but neitherspace nor relationships. 12 These network technologies reconfigure the spatialand temporal relationships of the trader to the market, and, in turn, reshapetheir strategies for information gathering.SpaceElectronic technologies create a global scale for the marketplace. Instead of anexus form, where information and traders converge in a central location,connections between traders are stretched into globe-spanning networks. In1999, the CBOT and its partner, the German-Swiss exchange Eurex, launcheda common trading platform on which any member of either exchange couldtrade the other’s products. The exchanges distributed the new screens widelywith particular concentrations in Chicago, London, and Frankfurt. A centralserver located in Chicago for American Treasury futures and Frankfurt forGerman Treasury futures matches trades and redistributes the profit and lossinformation to the traders’ desks around the world.The new electronic network reorganizes space and time in two importantways. First, the electronic network separates physical and social space. Therationale for creating electronic markets was built on the logic of efficiency.For clients of the exchanges, traders and their social networks are seen as apotentially costly impediment between the clients’ strategies and the market.The technological possibility of more direct contact with the market drivesmanagers and designers to create new technological platforms. 13 These platformsboth unify and spread access to the market. The trading screen dissolves
- Page 173 and 174: 152 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 175 and 176: 154 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 177 and 178: 156 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 179 and 180: 158 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 181 and 182: 160 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 183 and 184: 162 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 185 and 186: 164 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 187 and 188: 166 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 189 and 190: 168 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 191 and 192: 170 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 193 and 194: 172 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 195 and 196: 7. Labor in the network society: le
- Page 197 and 198: 176 Chris BennerLABOR AND FLEXIBILI
- Page 199 and 200: 178 Chris BennerFlexibility in Work
- Page 201 and 202: 180 Chris Bennerservices means that
- Page 203 and 204: 182 Chris BennerTable 7.2Indicators
- Page 205 and 206: 184 Chris BennerThis service is oft
- Page 207 and 208: 186 Chris Bennerof human resource a
- Page 209 and 210: 188 Chris Benneryears, however, edu
- Page 211 and 212: 190 Chris Bennermarket, however, is
- Page 213 and 214: 192 Chris BennerFlexible labor mark
- Page 215 and 216: 194 Chris BennerAsaravala, Amit (20
- Page 217 and 218: 196 Chris BennerLave, Jean and Weng
- Page 219 and 220: 8. Time, space, and technology infi
- Page 221 and 222: 200 Caitlin Zaloomthe bids and offe
- Page 223: 202 Caitlin Zaloomexchange, the bro
- Page 227 and 228: 206 Caitlin Zaloomadvantage of the
- Page 229 and 230: 208 Caitlin Zaloomletters to form w
- Page 231 and 232: 210 Caitlin Zaloom“reprogrammable
- Page 233 and 234: 212 Caitlin ZaloomCallon, Michel (1
- Page 236: PART IVSociability and social struc
- Page 239 and 240: 218 Keith N. Hampton“blasé attit
- Page 241 and 242: 220 Keith N. Hamptonerosion of the
- Page 243 and 244: 222 Keith N. Hamptonby the least ex
- Page 245 and 246: 224 Keith N. Hamptondid so to seek
- Page 247 and 248: 226 Keith N. Hamptonits ability to
- Page 249 and 250: 228 Keith N. Hamptonimmediately app
- Page 251 and 252: 230 Keith N. HamptonREFERENCESAngsi
- Page 253 and 254: 232 Keith N. HamptonSouthern Califo
- Page 255 and 256: 234 Manuel Castells et al.this stud
- Page 257 and 258: 236 Manuel Castells et al.On the ot
- Page 259 and 260: 238 Manuel Castells et al.friends a
- Page 261 and 262: 240 Manuel Castells et al.Table 10.
- Page 263 and 264: 242 Manuel Castells et al.way behin
- Page 265 and 266: 244 Manuel Castells et al.by radio.
- Page 267 and 268: 246 Manuel Castells et al.The six t
- Page 269 and 270: 248 Manuel Castells et al.that belo
- Page 271 and 272: 250 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
- Page 273 and 274: 252 Wayne E. Baker and Kenneth M. C
204 Caitlin Zaloomrecently, the logic of the trading nexus has been unchallen<strong>ge</strong>d. Chan<strong>ge</strong>s to thepit technology have focused on the delivery of information to the pit and thedistribution of commodity prices that are made there. From chalkboards andtelegraphs to telephone, digital order books, and electronic screens, informationtechnology has been used to augment the trading nexus.FROM NEXUS TO NETWORKAfter a century and a half of dominance, the pit is now giving way to onlineforms of trading. Digital markets are obviating the CBOT nexus by establishin<strong>ge</strong>lectronic networks that stretch over the globe. This new market form linksdispersed traders into a unified, but decentralized, market. This is not,however, a simple reproduction or rationalization of the marketplace. Thesedigital platforms create new orientations to space and time that define themarket environment and the information available to traders. Where the tradingpit was designed to unify the market in space and time, electronic futurestrading creates a technological network of traders that share time but neitherspace nor relationships. 12 These network technologies reconfigure the spatialand temporal relationships of the trader to the market, and, in turn, reshapetheir strategies for information gathering.SpaceElectronic technologies create a global scale for the marketplace. Instead of anexus form, where information and traders conver<strong>ge</strong> in a central location,connections between traders are stretched into globe-spanning networks. In1999, the CBOT and its partner, the German-Swiss exchan<strong>ge</strong> Eurex, launcheda common trading platform on which any member of either exchan<strong>ge</strong> couldtrade the other’s products. The exchan<strong>ge</strong>s distributed the new screens widelywith particular concentrations in Chicago, London, and Frankfurt. A centralserver located in Chicago for American Treasury futures and Frankfurt forGerman Treasury futures matches trades and redistributes the profit and lossinformation to the traders’ desks around the world.The new electronic network reorganizes space and time in two importantways. First, the electronic network separates physical and social space. Therationale for creating electronic markets was built on the logic of efficiency.For clients of the exchan<strong>ge</strong>s, traders and their social networks are seen as apotentially costly impediment between the clients’ strategies and the market.The technological possibility of more direct contact with the market drivesmana<strong>ge</strong>rs and designers to create new technological platforms. 13 These platformsboth unify and spread access to the market. The trading screen dissolves