Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
Labor in the network society 181ment relationships; (2) shortened job tenures, reflected in high levels of jobturnover; and (3) mediated employment relationships, in which the directemployee–employer relationship is mediated by additional institutions andexternal pressures.Non-standard employment: This term generally refers to all employmentthat is not characterized by full-time, year-round employment for an indefiniteperiod, working for a single employer who largely directs and controls theconditions of employment (Carré et al., 2000; Kalleberg, 2000). This includestemporary, part-time, contract employment, and self-employment. While estimatesof non-standard employment vary, driven by ambiguities in definitionsand difficulties in measurement, it seems to be high in Silicon Valley andgrowing quite rapidly (Benner, 2003d). Between 1984 and 1998, for example,employment in temporary help agencies in the Valley grew by 174 percent,compared to 26 percent in total employment (see table 7.2). Between 1990 and1994, employment in temporary agencies actually increased by 30 percent,while overall employment declined.Outsourcing has expanded in the past twenty years, first in service activities,manufacturing, and now increasingly in high-end design (Davis, 2003).The numbers of independent contractors and self-employed people haveexpanded as well: approximately 15 percent of tax returns in the regionincluded some self-employment income in 1999 (JV: SVN, 2000). Dependingon how one deals with potential double-counting, and definitions, an estimated44–74 percent of all job growth in Santa Clara County between 1984 and 1998was accounted for in the growth of non-standard employment (Benner, 2002).Using a somewhat broader definition of non-standard employment, a surveyin 1999 estimated that a full 67 percent of workers in the state as a whole donot have “traditional employment” (Yelin and Trupin, 1999).Job turnover: As described above, there are high levels of job turnover inSilicon Valley, as employees move more frequently from firm to firm. A 2001survey of workers 25 years and older found a median job tenure of 30 months(about half the national median of 4.7 years), 3 with only 32 percent reportinghaving worked in their current job for at least five years, and only 20 percentlonger than ten years (Pastor et al., 2003). Perhaps more important thanincreased turnover, however, is the short-term nature of the implicit employmentcontract, with many firms and workers not even presuming they willhave a long-term relationship, even if workers are hired in “permanent” positions(Rousseau, 1995). There is widespread acceptance of people movingfrequently from company to company; loyalty is typically owed more toproject teams, particular technologies or industries, or the Valley as a whole,rather than to individual companies.
182 Chris BennerTable 7.2Indicators of flexible employment in Silicon ValleyWorkersGrowth in the non-standard Change Increaseworkforce a 1984 1998 (%) (No.)Temporary workers 12,340 33,850 174 21,510Part-time workers 136,200 180,762 33 44,562Business services 48,500 130,300 169 81,800Self-employed 45,700 76,920 68 31,220Upper estimate of size of nonstandardworkforce 242,700 421,832 74 179,132Lower estimate of size of nonstandardworkforce 189,300 277,992 47 88,692Total civilian employment 761,200 961,500 26 200,300EmploymentEmploymentgrowth of firmsgrowth of newSigns of employment volatility existing in 1990 firmsEmployment in high-techindustries (1990–2001) b –120,559 258,7961999–2000 2001–2002Employment change inhigh-tech industries c +12% –22%Median job tenure (2001) d 30 monthsSources: a Figures for temporary workers and business services come from the CaliforniaEmployment Development Department. Figures for self-employment are projections based on USCensus data. Figures for part-time employment are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, andassume Santa Clara County has the same percentage of part-time workers as the nationb Junfu Zhang, High-tech Start-ups and Industry Dynamics in Silicon Valley (San Francisco:Public Policy Institute of California, 2003)c Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network, 2001 Index of Silicon Valley and 2003 Index of SiliconValley (San Jose: Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network, 2001, 2003)d Manuel Pastor, Laura Leete, Laura Dresser, Chris Benner, Annette Bernhardt, Bob Brownstein,and Sarah Zimmerman, “Economic Opportunity in a Volatile Economy: Understanding the Roleof Labor Market Intermediaries in Two Regions,” report to the Ford Foundation (San Jose:Working Partnerships, 2003)Mediated employment relationships: Another significant development in thenature of employment relations is the increasing mediation of that relationshipby forces or institutions external to the firm. In some cases, this has beenreferred to as “market-mediated work arrangements” (Abraham, 1990;Cappelli, 1999) in which pressures from outside the firm boundaries are usedas a management tool, which has become highly entrenched in Silicon Valley.This is reflected in the following description of electronic manufacturingservices firm Solectron’s shop-floor management system:
- Page 152 and 153: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 154 and 155: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 156 and 157: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 158 and 159: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 160 and 161: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 162 and 163: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 164: PART IIIThe Network Economy
- Page 167 and 168: 146 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 169 and 170: 148 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 171 and 172: 150 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 173 and 174: 152 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 175 and 176: 154 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 177 and 178: 156 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 179 and 180: 158 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 181 and 182: 160 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 183 and 184: 162 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 185 and 186: 164 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 187 and 188: 166 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 189 and 190: 168 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 191 and 192: 170 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 193 and 194: 172 Marshall Van Alstyne and Nathan
- Page 195 and 196: 7. Labor in the network society: le
- Page 197 and 198: 176 Chris BennerLABOR AND FLEXIBILI
- Page 199 and 200: 178 Chris BennerFlexibility in Work
- Page 201: 180 Chris Bennerservices means that
- Page 205 and 206: 184 Chris BennerThis service is oft
- Page 207 and 208: 186 Chris Bennerof human resource a
- Page 209 and 210: 188 Chris Benneryears, however, edu
- Page 211 and 212: 190 Chris Bennermarket, however, is
- Page 213 and 214: 192 Chris BennerFlexible labor mark
- Page 215 and 216: 194 Chris BennerAsaravala, Amit (20
- Page 217 and 218: 196 Chris BennerLave, Jean and Weng
- Page 219 and 220: 8. Time, space, and technology infi
- Page 221 and 222: 200 Caitlin Zaloomthe bids and offe
- Page 223 and 224: 202 Caitlin Zaloomexchange, the bro
- Page 225 and 226: 204 Caitlin Zaloomrecently, the log
- Page 227 and 228: 206 Caitlin Zaloomadvantage of the
- Page 229 and 230: 208 Caitlin Zaloomletters to form w
- Page 231 and 232: 210 Caitlin Zaloom“reprogrammable
- Page 233 and 234: 212 Caitlin ZaloomCallon, Michel (1
- Page 236: PART IVSociability and social struc
- Page 239 and 240: 218 Keith N. Hampton“blasé attit
- Page 241 and 242: 220 Keith N. Hamptonerosion of the
- Page 243 and 244: 222 Keith N. Hamptonby the least ex
- Page 245 and 246: 224 Keith N. Hamptondid so to seek
- Page 247 and 248: 226 Keith N. Hamptonits ability to
- Page 249 and 250: 228 Keith N. Hamptonimmediately app
- Page 251 and 252: 230 Keith N. HamptonREFERENCESAngsi
Labor in the network society 181ment relationships; (2) shortened job tenures, reflected in high levels of jobturnover; and (3) mediated employment relationships, in which the directemployee–employer relationship is mediated by additional institutions andexternal pressures.Non-standard employment: This term <strong>ge</strong>nerally refers to all employmentthat is not characterized by full-time, year-round employment for an indefiniteperiod, working for a single employer who lar<strong>ge</strong>ly directs and controls theconditions of employment (Carré et al., 2000; Kalleberg, 2000). This includestemporary, part-time, contract employment, and self-employment. While estimatesof non-standard employment vary, driven by ambiguities in definitionsand difficulties in measurement, it seems to be high in Silicon Valley andgrowing quite rapidly (Benner, 2003d). Between 1984 and 1998, for example,employment in temporary help a<strong>ge</strong>ncies in the Valley grew by 174 percent,compared to 26 percent in total employment (see table 7.2). Between 1990 and1994, employment in temporary a<strong>ge</strong>ncies actually increased by 30 percent,while overall employment declined.Outsourcing has expanded in the past twenty years, first in service activities,manufacturing, and now increasingly in high-end design (Davis, 2003).The numbers of independent contractors and self-employed people haveexpanded as well: approximately 15 percent of tax returns in the regionincluded some self-employment income in 1999 (JV: SVN, 2000). Dependingon how one deals with potential double-counting, and definitions, an estimated44–74 percent of all job growth in Santa Clara County between 1984 and 1998was accounted for in the growth of non-standard employment (Benner, 2002).Using a somewhat broader definition of non-standard employment, a surveyin 1999 estimated that a full 67 percent of workers in the state as a whole donot have “traditional employment” (Yelin and Trupin, 1999).Job turnover: As described above, there are high levels of job turnover inSilicon Valley, as employees move more frequently from firm to firm. A 2001survey of workers 25 years and older found a median job tenure of 30 months(about half the national median of 4.7 years), 3 with only 32 percent reportinghaving worked in their current job for at least five years, and only 20 percentlon<strong>ge</strong>r than ten years (Pastor et al., 2003). Perhaps more important thanincreased turnover, however, is the short-term nature of the implicit employmentcontract, with many firms and workers not even presuming they willhave a long-term relationship, even if workers are hired in “permanent” positions(Rousseau, 1995). There is widespread acceptance of people movingfrequently from company to company; loyalty is typically owed more toproject teams, particular technologies or industries, or the Valley as a whole,rather than to individual companies.