10.07.2015 Views

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

Untitled - socium.ge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 Steve WoolgarSurveillance and Privacy at Work,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 137–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Miller, D. and Slater, D. (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford:Berg.Nettleton, S., Pleace, N., Burrows, R., Muncer, S., and Loader, B. (2002) “The Realityof Virtual Social Support,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology,Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 176–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Schiller, D. (2000) Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System.Cambrid<strong>ge</strong>, MA: MIT Press.Shove, E. and Rip, A. (2000) “Users and Unicorns: A Discussion of Mythical Beasts inInteractive Science,” Science and Public Policy, 27 (3): 175–82.Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P. (eds) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. London:Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Star, S. L. and Griesmer, J. (1989) “Institutional Ecology, Translations and Coherence:Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology,1907–1939,” Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–420.Swann, G. M. P. and Watts, T. (2002) “Visualisation Needs Vision: The Pre-paradigmaticCharacter of Virtual Reality,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 41–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Toulouse, C. and Luke, T. W. (eds) (1998) The Politics of Cyberspace. London:Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Watt, S. E., Lea, M., and Spears, R. (2002) “How Social is Internet Communication?A Reappraisal of Bandwidth and Anonymity Effects,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), VirtualSociety? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 61–77. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.Wellman, B. (2003) “The Mobilized Society in Theory and Practice,” paper presentedto the iCS/OII conference, Oxford, September 17–20.—— and Gulia, M. (1999) “Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don’tRide Alone,” in M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace, pp.167–94. London: Routled<strong>ge</strong>.Wittel, A., Lury, C., and Lash, S. (2002) “Real and Virtual Connectivity: New Mediain London,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality,pp. 189–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Woolgar, S. (1999) “Analytic Scepticism,” in W. D. Dutton (ed.), Society on the Line:Information Politics in the Digital A<strong>ge</strong>, pp. 335–7. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.—— (2000) “The Social Basis of Interactive Social Science,” Science and PublicPolicy, 27 (3): 165–73.—— (2002) “Five Rules of Virtuality,” in S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society?Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 1–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.–— and Cooper, G. (1999) “Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence? Moses’ Brid<strong>ge</strong>s,Winner’s Brid<strong>ge</strong>s and Other Urban Le<strong>ge</strong>nds,” Social Studies of Science 29 (3):433–49.Wyatt, S., Thomas, G., and Terranova, T. (2002) “They Came, They Surfed, They WentBack to the Beach: Conceptualizing Use and Non-use of the Internet,” in S.Woolgar (ed.), Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality, pp. 23–40. Oxford:Oxford University Press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!