Untitled - socium.ge
Untitled - socium.ge Untitled - socium.ge
The Russian network society 91estimated at the level of 2.2 percent of GDP (4.7 billion US$). The number ofemployees was about 500,000, less than 1 percent of the labor force(Issledovanije ID “Komp’juterra, 2003).The statistics are in many ways discouraging. They show the marginal roleof the information-technology sector in Russia’s economy and, in addition,demonstrate the gap between the industrial and new sectors of the Russianeconomy. Distance and technical backwardness hamper the all-Russianprogress of interactive digital networks – the backbone of the new economy.As a rule, problems of the new Russian economy arise from the low level ofthe national telecommunications infrastructure (still using copper cables) andthe long-term crisis in the economy. The monopoly position of Rostelecom, thekey player in the regional telecom markets, hinders competition in the sectorand prevents the resolution of the problem of the “last mile.”Access to the Internet has become an evident indicator of acute problemsfaced by the new economy. Low telephone penetration (no more than 180 linesper 1,000 inhabitants) and the poor quality of telephone lines (ISDN-lines areextremely rare even in big cities, and fiber optics almost inaccessible), alongwith low penetration of home computers (64 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2001) arethe most critical obstacles to progress. Poor living standards make the rapidexpansion of the telecommunications infrastructure (for example, broadbanddigital networks) into homes practically unrealistic. This also leads to thealmost complete disconnection of rural areas both from fixed telephone andInternet networks.Compared to other former Soviet countries, Russia maintains the biggestnetwork of Internet hosts, but on a similar index for Western European countriesit lags far behind, with only 105 hosts per 1,000 citizens. Russia is, ofcourse, ahead of Moldavia, Armenia, Georgia, and the independent states ofCentral Asia where less than 1 per cent of the population has access to theInternet. It is worth noting that the level of telecommunications infrastructurein the country does not allow for a drastic improvement in the situation. Thelevel of teledensity is 197 telephones per 1,000 citizens, still far behind themost advanced countries.Nevertheless, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the Russianinformation-technology sector has experienced an essential growth inspired byInternet progress. Investments have increased significantly and private companieshave enthusiastically entered the market. In order to promote the Internetamong the mass audience, small-scale access providers have invented a specificallyRussian solution of a cheaper technology, so-called home networks,invented to avoid the “last mile” problem by connecting neighboring apartmentsand further switching them to the Internet. Home networks haveevolved in the densely populated areas of big cities and linked private apartmentsinto intranets with a further connection to the Internet. However, the
92 Elena Vartanovamajority of Russian access providers are secondary providers and technicallyunable to provide access to international networks. Only in Moscow and StPetersburg can Internet companies connect users directly with foreignnetworks. The dominance of the two megapolises in terms of content andservice supply makes the prospect for significant spreading of the new economyinto the regions fairly problematic.Eventually, Russian private business, especially finance institutions andsmall firms, have become heavy users of the Internet, which enables them toovercome many of the existing defects in communication, transport, andadministration. The Internet has made private business less dependent uponthe assistance and cooperation of official authorities. Other advantages forsmall and medium Russian enterprises are based upon the fact that some popularelectronic mail servers offer their facilities and services free of charge; inaddition, local telephone operators provide their services mostly free. As aresult, this technologically advanced, although small, sector of the Russianeconomy is characterized by active use of information technology andnetwork corporate structures to guarantee greater efficiency in organizationalcommunication within companies.This uneasy progress of the new Russian economy is partly counterbalancedby the progress of mobile telephony. Its significance as an alternativetechnological infrastructure for a network society has grown enormously. Withthe increase in amount and volume of transmitted information, mobile telephonenetworks have radically changed the Russian communication landscape.The spread of cellular phones has responded not only to the demand forimproved one-to-one communication. Almost 23 million Russians (15.5percent of the population) who currently use mobile phones have shown aninterest in various technological applications like SMS services, distributionof content, and so on. In general terms, the significance of mobile telephonyfor Russia is difficult to overestimate. It has created a competitive andeconomically viable market based on flexible pricing policies. As a result,three big companies operating in the sector constantly offer new services andthe opportunity of lower prices. As a result, operators of fixed telephonenetworks have lost their monopoly, and Russians have received more mobilityand independence in their everyday information consumption, business-tobusinessand multiple-to-multiple communication.FROM VERTICAL PYRAMID TO NETWORKS: RUNET INPOLITICS AND LEISUREThe rapid spread of the Internet has created its own mythology. Among themost popular declarations is the one claiming greater than ever freedom of
- Page 62 and 63: Informationalism and the network so
- Page 64 and 65: Informationalism and the network so
- Page 66: Informationalism and the network so
- Page 70 and 71: 2. Institutional models of the netw
- Page 72 and 73: Silicon Valley and Finland 51PATHS
- Page 74 and 75: Silicon Valley and Finland 53Table
- Page 76 and 77: Silicon Valley and Finland 55the fi
- Page 78 and 79: Silicon Valley and Finland 57There
- Page 80 and 81: Silicon Valley and Finland 59inform
- Page 82 and 83: Silicon Valley and Finland 61that I
- Page 84 and 85: Silicon Valley and Finland 63EBay,
- Page 86 and 87: Silicon Valley and Finland 65produc
- Page 88 and 89: wholly devoted to, or dependent on,
- Page 90 and 91: Silicon Valley and Finland 69The st
- Page 92 and 93: Silicon Valley and Finland 71JOT Au
- Page 94 and 95: Silicon Valley and Finland 73risk i
- Page 96 and 97: Silicon Valley and Finland 75respec
- Page 98 and 99: Silicon Valley and Finland 77esting
- Page 100 and 101: Silicon Valley and Finland 79100090
- Page 102 and 103: Silicon Valley and Finland 81the Fi
- Page 104 and 105: Silicon Valley and Finland 83——
- Page 106 and 107: The Russian network society 85but s
- Page 108 and 109: The Russian network society 87All t
- Page 110 and 111: The Russian network society 89inequ
- Page 114 and 115: The Russian network society 93expre
- Page 116 and 117: The Russian network society 95in st
- Page 118 and 119: The Russian network society 97actio
- Page 120 and 121: 4. The Internet in China: technolog
- Page 122 and 123: The Internet in China 101power of t
- Page 124 and 125: The Internet in China 103cially tho
- Page 126 and 127: The Internet in China 1057060504030
- Page 128 and 129: The Internet in China 107(Baum, 199
- Page 130 and 131: The Internet in China 109native-pla
- Page 132 and 133: The Internet in China 111“network
- Page 134 and 135: The Internet in China 113Usually on
- Page 136 and 137: The Internet in China 115lifestyle
- Page 138 and 139: The Internet in China 117To borrow
- Page 140 and 141: The Internet in China 119Cartier, a
- Page 142 and 143: The Internet in China 121Bu, Wei (2
- Page 144 and 145: The Internet in China 123jianguanzh
- Page 146 and 147: 5. Reflexive Internet? The Britishe
- Page 148 and 149: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 150 and 151: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 152 and 153: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 154 and 155: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 156 and 157: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 158 and 159: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
- Page 160 and 161: Reflexive Internet? The British exp
The Russian network society 91estimated at the level of 2.2 percent of GDP (4.7 billion US$). The number ofemployees was about 500,000, less than 1 percent of the labor force(Issledovanije ID “Komp’juterra, 2003).The statistics are in many ways discouraging. They show the marginal roleof the information-technology sector in Russia’s economy and, in addition,demonstrate the gap between the industrial and new sectors of the Russianeconomy. Distance and technical backwardness hamper the all-Russianprogress of interactive digital networks – the backbone of the new economy.As a rule, problems of the new Russian economy arise from the low level ofthe national telecommunications infrastructure (still using copper cables) andthe long-term crisis in the economy. The monopoly position of Rostelecom, thekey player in the regional telecom markets, hinders competition in the sectorand prevents the resolution of the problem of the “last mile.”Access to the Internet has become an evident indicator of acute problemsfaced by the new economy. Low telephone penetration (no more than 180 linesper 1,000 inhabitants) and the poor quality of telephone lines (ISDN-lines areextremely rare even in big cities, and fiber optics almost inaccessible), alongwith low penetration of home computers (64 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2001) arethe most critical obstacles to progress. Poor living standards make the rapidexpansion of the telecommunications infrastructure (for example, broadbanddigital networks) into homes practically unrealistic. This also leads to thealmost complete disconnection of rural areas both from fixed telephone andInternet networks.Compared to other former Soviet countries, Russia maintains the big<strong>ge</strong>stnetwork of Internet hosts, but on a similar index for Western European countriesit lags far behind, with only 105 hosts per 1,000 citizens. Russia is, ofcourse, ahead of Moldavia, Armenia, Georgia, and the independent states ofCentral Asia where less than 1 per cent of the population has access to theInternet. It is worth noting that the level of telecommunications infrastructurein the country does not allow for a drastic improvement in the situation. Thelevel of teledensity is 197 telephones per 1,000 citizens, still far behind themost advanced countries.Nevertheless, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the Russianinformation-technology sector has experienced an essential growth inspired byInternet progress. Investments have increased significantly and private companieshave enthusiastically entered the market. In order to promote the Internetamong the mass audience, small-scale access providers have invented a specificallyRussian solution of a cheaper technology, so-called home networks,invented to avoid the “last mile” problem by connecting neighboring apartmentsand further switching them to the Internet. Home networks haveevolved in the densely populated areas of big cities and linked private apartmentsinto intranets with a further connection to the Internet. However, the