10.07.2015 Views

Page 1 of 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

Page 1 of 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

Page 1 of 1 - Central Bureau of Investigation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. CONFIRMATION6.1 As per the present instructions <strong>of</strong> the government, confirmationwill be made only once in the service <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>ficial which will be inthe entry grade. However, if a government servant is appointed toanother post by direct recruitment either in the same departmentor a different department, it will be necessary to consider him forconfirmation in the new post in which he has been appointed bydirect recruitment irrespective <strong>of</strong> the fact that the <strong>of</strong>ficer washolding the earlier post on a substantive basis.6.2 A person appointed against a permanent post as a directrecruit with definite conditions <strong>of</strong> probation is to be confirmed inthe grade with effect from the date on which he successfullycompletes the period <strong>of</strong> probation. The decision whether heshould be confirmed or his probation extended should be takensoon after the expiry <strong>of</strong> the initial probationary period, i.e.ordinarily within 6 to 8 weeks and communicated to the employeetogether with the reasons in the case <strong>of</strong> extension.6.3 Both confirmation and denial <strong>of</strong> confirmation involveassessment <strong>of</strong> the work done by the <strong>of</strong>ficer concerned and suchassessment can best be done by the DPC. Before confirming aperson, integrity clearance should always be obtained from thevigilance unit <strong>of</strong> the Ministry/Department concerned. In the case<strong>of</strong> confirmation, the DPC should not determine the relative merit<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers but it should assess the <strong>of</strong>ficers as ‘Fit’ or ‘Not yet fit’ forconfirmation in their turn on the basis <strong>of</strong> their performance in thepost as assessed with reference to their service record.6.4 The Union Public Service Commission need not be associatedwith a Departmental Promotion Committee constituted forconsidering the cases <strong>of</strong> confirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers. The proceedings<strong>of</strong> the DPC which considered the confirmation <strong>of</strong> Group ‘A’ <strong>of</strong>ficers,should, however, be sent to the Commission for their approval.While doing so, the cases <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficers not considered fit forconfirmation along with their records should be specificallyreferred to the Commission for their approval.6.5 As regards consideration <strong>of</strong> cases for confirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficersunder suspension or in respect <strong>of</strong> whom disciplinary/criminalcases are pending the same procedure, which is followed by the<strong>Page</strong> 41 <strong>of</strong> 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!