10.07.2015 Views

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe ... - MemoFin.fr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Changes <strong>in</strong> the climate system2.2.5 Precipitation extremesRelevanceChanges <strong>in</strong> the <strong>fr</strong>equency <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity of extremeprecipitation (see Box 2.4 for def<strong>in</strong>itions) can haveconsiderable <strong>impacts</strong> on society, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the builtenvironment, agriculture, <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>and</strong> ecosystemservices. An assessment of past trends <strong>and</strong> futureprojections of extreme precipitation is thereforeessential for advis<strong>in</strong>g policy decisions on mitigation<strong>and</strong> adaptation to climate <strong>change</strong> (Kendon et al.,2008). The risks posed by precipitation-relatedhazards, such as flood<strong>in</strong>g events (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g flashfloods) <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>slides, are also <strong>in</strong>fluenced bynon‐climatic factors, such as population density,floodpla<strong>in</strong> development <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-use <strong>change</strong>.Hence, estimates of future <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> such risksneed to consider <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> both climatic <strong>and</strong>non‐climatic factors. Estimates of trends <strong>in</strong> heavy orextreme precipitation are more uncerta<strong>in</strong> than trends<strong>in</strong> mean precipitation because, by their very nature,extreme precipitation events have a low <strong>fr</strong>equency ofoccurrence. This leads to greater uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties whenassess<strong>in</strong>g the statistical significance of observed<strong>change</strong>s.Past trendsObservational records do not <strong>in</strong>dicate widespreadsignificant trends <strong>in</strong> either the number ofconsecutive wet days (<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g flood risks) ordry days (<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g drought risks) across <strong>Europe</strong>(Map 2.7). Some <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> these variables havebeen observed across <strong>Europe</strong> but most of themare not statistically significant due to large naturalvariability. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, parts of north-western <strong>and</strong>north-eastern <strong>Europe</strong> show significant <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gtrends <strong>in</strong> both the number of wet days <strong>and</strong> dry days.The proportion of <strong>Europe</strong> that has experiencedextreme or moderate meteorological droughtconditions did not <strong>change</strong> significantly dur<strong>in</strong>g the20th century (Lloyd-Hughes <strong>and</strong> Saunders, 2002).Summer droughts have also shown no statisticallysignificant trend dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1901–2002(Robock et al., 2005) ( 41 ).Box 2.4Def<strong>in</strong>ition of precipitation extremesThe term 'precipitation extreme' can refer to both high <strong>and</strong> low extremes of precipitation. High extremes ofprecipitation are def<strong>in</strong>ed either by the amount of precipitation <strong>in</strong> a given time period (e.g. daily or hourly) or bythe period above a location-specific threshold. Indicators for extreme precipitation may be def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms o<strong>fr</strong>eturn periods (such as 1 <strong>in</strong> 20 years, termed absolute extremes). Alternatively, they may be def<strong>in</strong>ed relativeto the normal precipitation distribution <strong>in</strong> an area (e.g. the heaviest 5 % of daily precipitation averaged over a30‐year time period, relative extremes). The former captures <strong>in</strong><strong>fr</strong>equent but possibly high impact events, whereasthe latter has a more <strong>fr</strong>equent sampl<strong>in</strong>g rate, captur<strong>in</strong>g on average 18 days per year (over 30 years). Theapproach that is chosen depends largely on the application of the end user.Low extremes of precipitation can be quantified <strong>in</strong> terms of consecutive dry days. Note, however, that anassessment of <strong>change</strong>s <strong>in</strong> drought conditions should also consider other factors, such as soil moisture <strong>and</strong>vegetation responses to chang<strong>in</strong>g atmospheric CO 2concentration.Key messages: 2.2.5 Precipitation extremes• There are no widespread significant trends <strong>in</strong> either the number of consecutive dry or wet days across<strong>Europe</strong>.• Heavy precipitation events are likely to become more <strong>fr</strong>equent <strong>in</strong> most parts of <strong>Europe</strong>. The <strong>change</strong>s arestrongest <strong>in</strong> Sc<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>avia <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> northern <strong>and</strong> eastern central <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>in</strong> summer.( 41 ) More about droughts can be found <strong>in</strong> Section 3.3.4.68 <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>change</strong>, <strong>impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>vulnerability</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!